Study Stopped
Did not reach the enrollment goal.
A Comparison of Custom-manufactured vs. Off-the-rack (OTR) Compression Hosiery for Initial Management of Venous Disease
A Prospective Randomized-controlled Trial of Custom-manufactured vs. Off-the-rack (OTR) Compression Hosiery for Initial Management of Venous Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to assess the efficacy of custom-manufactured compression hosiery (also known as compression stockings) compared to similar off-the-rack (OTR) compression stockings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 25, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 17, 2020
CompletedFebruary 17, 2020
February 1, 2020
1.6 years
August 9, 2018
February 3, 2020
February 3, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (19)
Pain Management Experienced During Their Postoperative Care as Assessed by Five-point Satisfaction Scale
Five-point satisfaction scale consists of patients rating their overall postoperative pain management experience using a 5-point rating system. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "extremely dissatisfied", 2 "somewhat dissatisfied", 3 "Neutral/Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", 4 "somewhat satisfied" and 5 "extremely satisfied" with their postoperative pain care.
6 weeks
Pain Management Experienced During Their Postoperative Care as Assessed by Five-point Satisfaction Scale
Five-point satisfaction scale consists of patients rating their overall postoperative pain management experience using a 5-point rating system. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "extremely dissatisfied", 2 "somewhat dissatisfied", 3 "Neutral/Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", 4 "somewhat satisfied" and 5 "extremely satisfied" with their postoperative pain care.
90 days
Pain Management Experienced During Their Postoperative Care as Assessed by Five-point Satisfaction Scale
Five-point satisfaction scale consists of patients rating their overall postoperative pain management experience using a 5-point rating system. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "extremely dissatisfied", 2 "somewhat dissatisfied", 3 "Neutral/Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", 4 "somewhat satisfied" and 5 "extremely satisfied" with their postoperative pain care.
6 months
Pain as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory
The Brief Pain Inventory is a medical questionnaire used to measure pain, developed by the Pain Research Group of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Symptom Evaluation in Cancer Care. The score is an average of seven questions about pain interference in life. The score scale is from 0 to 10. 0 being pain does not interfere and 10 being that it completely interferes. 10 would be a worst outcome.
Baseline
Pain as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory
The Brief Pain Inventory is a medical questionnaire used to measure pain, developed by the Pain Research Group of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Symptom Evaluation in Cancer Care. The score is an average of seven questions about pain interference in life. The score scale is from 0 to 10. 0 being pain does not interfere and 10 being that it completely interferes. 10 would be a worst outcome.
6 weeks
Pain as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory
The Brief Pain Inventory is a medical questionnaire used to measure pain, developed by the Pain Research Group of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Symptom Evaluation in Cancer Care. The score is an average of seven questions about pain interference in life. The score scale is from 0 to 10. 0 being pain does not interfere and 10 being that it completely interferes. 10 would be a worst outcome.
90 days
Pain as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory
The Brief Pain Inventory is a medical questionnaire used to measure pain, developed by the Pain Research Group of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Symptom Evaluation in Cancer Care. The score is an average of seven questions about pain interference in life. The score scale is from 0 to 10. 0 being pain does not interfere and 10 being that it completely interferes. 10 would be a worst outcome.
6 months
Overall Estimate of Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument (Overall HRQoL Estimate)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
Baseline
Overall Estimate of Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument (Overall HRQoL Estimate)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
30 days
Overall Estimate of Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument (Overall HRQoL Estimate)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
90 days
Overall Estimate of Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument (Overall HRQoL Estimate)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
6 months
Physical Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument Physical Component Summary (PCS)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
Baseline
Physical Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument Physical Component Summary (PCS)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
30 days
Physical Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument Physical Component Summary (PCS)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
90 days
Physical Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument Physical Component Summary (PCS)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
6 months
Mental/Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument Mental Component Summary (MCS)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
Baseline
Mental/Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument Mental Component Summary (MCS)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
30 days
Mental/Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument Mental Component Summary (MCS)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
90 days
Mental/Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument Mental Component Summary (MCS)
The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health. The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients Who Will be Progressing to Ablation Therapy
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Custom-manufactured compression hosiery (Isobar)
EXPERIMENTALThe custom-fitted garment is manufactured specifically for each patient based on measurements taken with a 3-dimensional volumetric laser scan of the extremity, and can be sized individually to each limb.
Off-the-rack stockings (Sigvaris)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCurrently available off-the-rack compression hosiery are manufactured in eight fixed sizes (S-XLFC) that cannot be varied in size over their length to accommodate unusual anatomic patterns (eg., small ankle with large calf or vice versa) and may not achieve a comfortable fit that meets the compression goal over a uniform distribution of the limb.
Interventions
The custom-fitted garment is manufactured specifically for each patient based on measurements taken with a 3-dimensional volumetric laser scan of the extremity, and can be sized individually to each limb.
Currently available off-the-rack compression hosiery are manufactured in eight fixed sizes (S-XLFC) that cannot be varied in size over their length to accommodate unusual anatomic patterns (eg., small ankle with large calf or vice versa) and may not achieve a comfortable fit that meets the compression goal over a uniform distribution of the limb.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ability to comprehend and sign an informed consent and complete study questionnaires
- Patient is participating in usual work and home activities with no changes anticipated for the duration of the study
- The use of compression stocking is prescribed in accordance with the usual practice and management of venous disorders
- The patient will confirm they are willing to pay for the compression stockings.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient has a known allergy to any component of the stocking (latex, etc)
- The patient has non-venous source of pain in either leg that could, in the opinion of the investigator, confound the results of the study i.e.Neuropathy, Arterial insufficiency, Diabetes
- The patient is confined to bed
- The patient has uncontrolled Congestive Heart Failure
- The patient has acute dermatitis
- The patient has weeping dermatosis
- Patients with venous ulcers will be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Limitations and Caveats
Small sample size, did not reach target enrollment number.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Stuart A Harlin, MD
- Organization
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stuart A Harlin, MD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2018
First Posted
August 14, 2018
Study Start
April 25, 2017
Primary Completion
November 30, 2018
Study Completion
November 30, 2018
Last Updated
February 17, 2020
Results First Posted
February 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02