Trial of Aggressive Hydration Versus Rectal Indomethacin for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
AHRI-PEP
A Prospective Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness of Aggressive Hydration Versus High-dose Rectal Indomethacin in the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (PEP)
1 other identifier
interventional
352
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a commonly performed endoscopic procedure used to treat pancreato-biliary pathology. Acute pancreatitis or post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), is the most common major complication of ERCP, which is reported to occur in 2-10% of patients overall (ranging from 2-4% in low risk patients up to 8-40% in high-risk patients). Hydration is a mainstay of treatment for acute pancreatitis, independent of etiology. Aggressive hydration has also been shown to decrease incidence of PEP. Rectal NSAIDs, including Indomethacin, has a proven role in prevention of PEP. Though both aggressive hydration and rectal indomethacin are efficacious in preventing PEP, there is no head to head trial comparing the efficacy of these two therapeutic modalities. Thus, the aim is to determine whether aggressive intravenous peri-procedural hydration or high dose rectal indomethacin immediately after ERCP decrease the incidence of PEP. The investigator's hypothesis is that prophylactic treatment with aggressive intravenous hydration is not inferior to rectal indomethacin in preventing PEP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Oct 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2018
CompletedAugust 16, 2018
August 1, 2018
4 months
August 9, 2018
August 14, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
The primary endpoint is development of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP, a categorical variable) which will be defined as presence of increased abdominal pain and a serum amylase level three times the upper limit of normal (3xULN). Increased pain will be defined as an increase in the visual analog pain score compared to the value immediately prior to ERCP
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Clinical volume overload
24 hours
Serum Amylase three times the upper limit of normal
8 hours
Post-ERCP pain abdomen: VAS
24 hours
Other Outcomes (1)
Death
7 days
Study Arms (2)
Aggressive Hydration
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to the aggressive intravenous hydration group received Lactated Ringers solution (LR) \[COMPOUND SODIUM LACTATE INJECTION I.P.,INVEN PHARMACEUTICALS PVT.LTD,MP,INDIA\] intravenously (IV) at 3 mL/kg/hr during the ERCP, a 20cc/kg IV bolus immediately afterward, and then at 3 mL/kg/hr for 8 hours following the procedure.
Rectal Indomethacin
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomised to Rectal Indomethacin were administered a suppository of 100 mg of indomethacin \[Indomethacin Suppository 100 Mg B.P, GALEN PHARMACEUTICAL LTD, GUJRAT, INDIA\] just after the completion of ERCP procedure.
Interventions
High-volume Lactated Ringer Solution
Post-ERCP rectal administration of 100 MG Indomethacin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients aged 18 to 70 years undegoingt ERCP for the first time
- Patients undergoing ERCP for standard clinical indications
You may not qualify if:
- Ongoing acute pancreatitis
- Known chronic calcific pancreatitis
- Pancreatic head mass
- Any malignancy
- Standard contraindications to ERCP
- Unwillingness or inability to consent for the study
- Ongoing hypotension including those with sepsis
- Cardiac insufficiency (CI, \>NYHA Class II heart failure)
- Renal insufficiency (RI, creatinine clearance \<40mL/min)
- Severe liver dysfunction (albumin \< 3mg/dL)
- Respiratory insufficiency (defined as oxygen saturation \< 90%)
- Greater than 70 years of age
- Pregnancy
- Breastfeeding mother
- Allergy/hypersensitivity to aspirin or NSAIDs
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IPGIMER
Kolkata, West Bengal, 700020, India
Related Publications (1)
Guha P, Patra PS, Misra D, Ahammed SM, Sarkar R, Dhali GK, Ray S, Das K. An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness of Aggressive Hydration Versus High-dose Rectal Indomethacin in the Prevention of Postendoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatographic Pancreatitis (AHRI-PEP). J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023 May-Jun 01;57(5):524-530. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001712. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
PMID: 35470300DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kshaunish Das, MD, DM
Professor, Division of Gastroenterology, SDLD, IPGMER
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Division of Gastroenterology, SDLD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2018
First Posted
August 14, 2018
Study Start
October 15, 2017
Primary Completion
February 15, 2018
Study Completion
May 31, 2018
Last Updated
August 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08