NCT03625271

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate the utility, safety, and efficacy of using PEER Interactive - an EEG-based technology - to inform the prescription of medications to participants with a primary diagnosis of a depressive disorder, with or without comorbidity of non-psychotic behavioral disorders, versus treatment as usual.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable depression

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable depression

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 16, 2016

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 2, 2018

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 10, 2018

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

August 2, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 29, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Electroencephalogramdata basemachine learning

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report 16 Item Questionnaire

    A proven and accepted survey for measuring symptoms of depression

    Day 0 through study completion, an average of 3 months.

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • CHRT-7SR:

    Day 0 through study completion, an average of 3 months.

  • PCL-M/C - if applicable:

    Day 0 through study completion, an average of 3 months.

  • Patient-recorded CGI-I (Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement)

    Day 0 through study completion, an average of 3 months.

  • Physician-recorded CGI-I (Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement)

    Day 0 through study completion, an average of 3 months.

  • CGI-S (Clinical Global Impressions - Severity) - Physician

    Day 0 through study completion, an average of 3 months.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control

NO INTERVENTION

All subjects will undergo same study procedures. Subjects in the Control Arm will receive treatment as usual by the prescribing clinician/investigator. The prescribing clinician/investigator will not receive the PEER Report of probable medication response for a control arm subject.

Experimental

EXPERIMENTAL

All subjects will undergo same study procedures. Subjects in the Experimental Arm will receive treatment as usual by the prescribing clinician/investigator. However, the prescribing clinician/investigator will receive the PEER Report of probable medication response for an experimental arm subject. The report will provide additional data/information regarding probable medication response for an experimental arm subject to the prescriber .

Device: The PEER Report

Interventions

PEER Interactive references a subject's QEEG to a normative and then symptomatic database. By comparing a given subject's QEEG to a database of QEEGs of subjects who have tried and responded to a specific medication, PEER provides useful information regarding the response of neurophysiologically similar subjects to a wide number of medications - providing clinicians with useful information as to medication outcomes before a medication regime is started. Clinicians have also reported that negative findings (in which neurophysiologically similar subjects reported resistant outcomes for certain medications) can be extremely useful in reducing trial and error. It has also been used to help select the medication that best matches the QEEG brainwave pattern.

Also known as: the PEER Interactive Report, the PEER Online Report
Experimental

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female subjects between the ages of 18 - 65 years of age who speak and read English.
  • Participants able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Participants with a primary diagnosis of a DSM-V depressive disorder, including subjects with comorbidity of a non-psychotic behavioral disorder.
  • Able to stop specified medications, including drugs of abuse, for 5 half-lives of the medication(s). See Appendix B for a list of the five half-life time periods for these medications.
  • The potential subject's primary care physician may be consulted to make these determinations.
  • Able to be washed out of specified medications within 14 days, i.e. 5 half-lives are not longer than 14 days (See Appendix B).
  • Participants will be selected from patients on the psychiatric inpatient ward, partially hospitalized patients, and psychiatric outpatients.
  • Ability to comply with the requirements of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Male and female subject less than 18 years old or greater than 65 years old
  • Participants who cannot provide written informed consent
  • Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder.
  • History of, or current, open head brain trauma.
  • Subjects with comorbidity of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) or traumatic brain injury (TBI) who experienced greater than 30 minutes loss of consciousness, greater than 24 hour alteration in consciousness or mental status, greater than 24 hours of post traumatic amnesia, or a Glasgow Coma Scale (best available score in first 24 hours) of less than 13.
  • Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, are unable to washout of specified medications in a period of 14 days or less..
  • History of: craniotomy, cerebral metastases, cerebrovascular accident; current diagnosis of seizure disorder, schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder, dementia, mental retardation, or major depression with psychotic features; or use of depot neuroleptics in last 12 months.
  • Clinically significant medical illness, including thyroid disorders, which cannot be remediated with medication, e.g. synthroid.
  • Known pregnancy and/or lactation, or intent to become pregnant during this study.
  • Chronic or acute pain requiring prescription pain medication(s) (narcotic or synthetic narcotic).
  • Candidates with any metal, shrapnel or other similar objects in the head that could affect the QEEG.
  • Candidates currently stable and considered to be at Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI) on current medications.
  • Participant has a positive urine drug screen.
  • Participant has active suicidal intent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Royal Mental Health Center

Ottawa, Ontario, K1Z 7K4, Canada

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Itil TM, Shapiro DM, Herrmann WM, Schulz W, Morgan V. HZI systems for EEG parametrization and classification of psychotropic drugs. Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol. 1979 Jan;12(1):4-19. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1094590.

    PMID: 419164BACKGROUND
  • Leuchter AF, Cook IA, Marangell LB, Gilmer WS, Burgoyne KS, Howland RH, Trivedi MH, Zisook S, Jain R, McCracken JT, Fava M, Iosifescu D, Greenwald S. Comparative effectiveness of biomarkers and clinical indicators for predicting outcomes of SSRI treatment in Major Depressive Disorder: results of the BRITE-MD study. Psychiatry Res. 2009 Sep 30;169(2):124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Aug 27.

    PMID: 19712979BACKGROUND
  • DeBattista C, Kinrys G, Hoffman D, Goldstein C, Zajecka J, Kocsis J, Teicher M, Potkin S, Preda A, Multani G, Brandt L, Schiller M, Iosifescu D, Fava M. The use of referenced-EEG (rEEG) in assisting medication selection for the treatment of depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 Jan;45(1):64-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Jul 3.

  • Iosifescu DV, Greenwald S, Devlin P, Perlis RH, Denninger JW, Alpert JE, Fava M. Pretreatment frontal EEG and changes in suicidal ideation during SSRI treatment in major depressive disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008 Apr;117(4):271-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01156.x. Epub 2008 Feb 26.

  • Knott V, Mahoney C, Kennedy S, Evans K. EEG power, frequency, asymmetry and coherence in male depression. Psychiatry Res. 2001 Apr 10;106(2):123-40. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4927(00)00080-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Verner Knott, PhD

    The Royal, University of Ottawa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Michael Metzig, BA

CONTACT

George Carpenter, B.A.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The Subject will be blinded as to study arm assignment and will provide the primary outcome measure.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Blinded participants will be randomized into a control or experimental group and receive a quantitative electroencephalogram (QEEG). Experimental group clinicians will use the PEER Interactive Report in the medication prescription process. Control group clinicians will not receive an Outcome Report. For the experimental group the clinician is expected to incorporate the guidance of the subject's PEER Outcome Report. Study staff will note the basis for all medication decisions in the subject's treatment/study file. Two evaluations are being made in this study. 1. Clinical utility of PEER Interactive where the health outcome of the experimental group will be compared to the outcomes of the control group. 2. Validation of the PEER Interactive outcomes database which is intended to measure post-hoc the health outcomes of participants where the research staff's pharmacotherapy decisions agreed with the output of PEER Interactive.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2018

First Posted

August 10, 2018

Study Start

June 16, 2016

Primary Completion

June 1, 2021

Study Completion

December 1, 2021

Last Updated

July 30, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations