Using Indirect Calorimetry for Liver Transplants Patients
Assessing the Appropriate Energy Expenditure Requirement Using Indirect Calorimetry for Liver Transplant Recipients
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although predicted REE calculated using the Penn state 1988 method agreed (ICC 0.61, p=0.00014) with the measured REE, all three predictive equations had a fixed bias and appeared to be inaccurate for predicting REE for liver transplant recipients. Therefore, precise measurements using indirect calorimetry may be helpful when treating critically ill patients to avoid underestimating or overestimating their metabolic needs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 3, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2018
CompletedAugust 9, 2018
August 1, 2018
5 months
August 3, 2018
August 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparing REE with the measurement for each predictive equation and indirect calorimetry
The REEs derived from each predictive equation were compared with the measured REE using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and a Bland-Altman plot.
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Indirect calorimetry measurement
Using indirect calorimetry for measure resting energy expenditure
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who had received liver transplants
You may qualify if:
- mechanically ventilated patients who had received liver transplants and were expected to stay in the ICU more than 2 days were studied.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal
- patients who were extubated before 36 hrs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hakjae Lee
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (4)
McClave SA, Martindale RG, Kiraly L. The use of indirect calorimetry in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2013 Mar;16(2):202-8. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32835dbc54.
PMID: 23340008RESULTSundstrom M, Tjader I, Rooyackers O, Wernerman J. Indirect calorimetry in mechanically ventilated patients. A systematic comparison of three instruments. Clin Nutr. 2013 Feb;32(1):118-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
PMID: 22763268RESULTKross EK, Sena M, Schmidt K, Stapleton RD. A comparison of predictive equations of energy expenditure and measured energy expenditure in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2012 Jun;27(3):321.e5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.07.084. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
PMID: 22425340RESULTXiao GZ, Su L, Duan PK, Wang QX, Huang Y. [Comparison of measuring energy expenditure with indirect calorimetry and traditional estimation of energy expenditure in patients in intensive care unit]. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Jul;23(7):392-5. Chinese.
PMID: 21787465RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Suk-kyung Hong, Ph.D.
Asan Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2018
First Posted
August 9, 2018
Study Start
December 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share