Low Energy Shock Wave for the Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS)
1 other identifier
interventional
49
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To investigate the efficacy and safety of LESW on participants with IC/BPS
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 4, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 26, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2020
CompletedFebruary 1, 2021
January 1, 2021
1.6 years
July 19, 2018
January 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of the O'Leary-Sant symptom score (OSS, including ICSI and ICPI)
Change of the O'Leary-Sant symptom score from baseline to 1 month after the treatment day. Subscales ICSI and ICPI are graded from 0 to 20 and 0 to 16, respectively. The items are summed to obtain OSS (range from 0 to 36, higher values represent a worse outcome).
Baseline and 1 month
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Net changes of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Baseline and 1 month
Net changes of the functional bladder capacity (FBC) as assessed by the maximum urine volume (milliliters) as recorded in 3-day voiding diary
Baseline and 1 month
Net changes of the voiding frequency at daytime as recorded in 3-day voiding diary
Baseline and 1 month
Net changes of the voiding frequency at night time as recorded in 3-day voiding diary
Baseline and 1 month
Net changes of the Global response assessment (GRA)
Baseline and 3 month
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo treatment (shock wave probe w/o energy)
Low energy shock wave
EXPERIMENTALLow energy shock wave treatment (shock wave probe w/ energy)
Interventions
Probe be transcutaneous applied to the suprapubic bladder region with 2000 shocks, frequency of 3 pulses per second and maximum total energy flow density 0.25 millijoule/mm2 once a week for 4 weeks
Probe be transcutaneous applied to the suprapubic bladder region with 2000 shocks, frequency of 3 pulses per second but no energy once a week for 4 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults with age of 20 years old or above
- Patients with symptoms of unpleasant sensation (pain, pressure, discomfort) perceived to be related to the urinary bladder, associated with lower urinary tract symptoms of more than six months duration, in the absence of infection or other identifiable causes
- Patients has received cystoscopy and ruled out other bladder lesion
- Free of active urinary tract infection
- Free of bladder outlet obstruction on enrollment
- Free of overt neurogenic bladder dysfunction and limitation of ambulation
- Patient or his/her legally acceptable representative has signed the written informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Patients had received intravesical hyaluronic acid treatment in recent 3 months, or intravesical Botox injection in recent 12 months Patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease and such as congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, poorly controlled hypertension, not able to receive regular follow-up
- Patients with bladder outlet obstruction on enrollment
- Patients with PVR \>100 ml
- Patients with uncontrolled confirmed diagnosis of acute urinary tract infection
- Patients have laboratory abnormalities at screening including: alanine aminotransferase (ALT)\> 3 x upper limit of normal range, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 3 x upper limit of normal range
- Patients have abnormal serum creatinine level \> 2 x upper limit of normal range
- Female patients who is pregnant, lactating, or with child-bearing potential without contraception
- Patients with any other serious disease considered by the investigator not in the condition to enter the trial
- Patients had received intravesical treatment for IC within recent 1 month
- Patients had participated investigational drug trial within 1 month before entering this study
- Patients with coagulopathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine
Kaohsiung City, 833, Taiwan
Related Publications (19)
Hanno PM, Burks DA, Clemens JQ, Dmochowski RR, Erickson D, Fitzgerald MP, Forrest JB, Gordon B, Gray M, Mayer RD, Newman D, Nyberg L Jr, Payne CK, Wesselmann U, Faraday MM; Interstitial Cystitis Guidelines Panel of the American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. AUA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2162-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.064. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
PMID: 21497847BACKGROUNDHanno PM, Sant GR. Clinical highlights of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/Interstitial Cystitis Association scientific conference on interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2001 Jun;57(6 Suppl 1):2-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01112-8.
PMID: 11378041BACKGROUNDNickel JC, Barkin J, Forrest J, Mosbaugh PG, Hernandez-Graulau J, Kaufman D, Lloyd K, Evans RJ, Parsons CL, Atkinson LE; Elmiron Study Group. Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of pentosan polysulfate sodium for interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2005 Apr;65(4):654-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.071.
PMID: 15833501BACKGROUNDHanno PM, Buehler J, Wein AJ. Use of amitriptyline in the treatment of interstitial cystitis. J Urol. 1989 Apr;141(4):846-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41029-9.
PMID: 2926877BACKGROUNDSairanen J, Forsell T, Ruutu M. Long-term outcome of patients with interstitial cystitis treated with low dose cyclosporine A. J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 1):2138-41. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000125139.91203.7a.
PMID: 15126772BACKGROUNDHanno PM, Erickson D, Moldwin R, Faraday MM; American Urological Association. Diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: AUA guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1545-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.086. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
PMID: 25623737BACKGROUNDChancellor MB, Yoshimura N. Treatment of interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3 Suppl 1):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.034.
PMID: 15013658BACKGROUNDShie JH, Liu HT, Kuo HC. Increased cell apoptosis of urothelium mediated by inflammation in interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):484.e7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.049.
PMID: 22310775BACKGROUNDLee JD, Lee MH. Increased expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor associated with glomerulation formation in patients with interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):971.e11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.050. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
PMID: 21813166BACKGROUNDChaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, Brendel W, Forssmann B, Walther V. First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol. 1982 Mar;127(3):417-20. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53841-0.
PMID: 6977650BACKGROUNDWang CJ. An overview of shock wave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. Chang Gung Med J. 2003 Apr;26(4):220-32.
PMID: 12846521BACKGROUNDDi Meglio F, Nurzynska D, Castaldo C, Miraglia R, Romano V, De Angelis A, Piegari E, Russo S, Montagnani S. Cardiac shock wave therapy: assessment of safety and new insights into mechanisms of tissue regeneration. J Cell Mol Med. 2012 Apr;16(4):936-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01393.x.
PMID: 21790971BACKGROUNDVardi Y, Appel B, Kilchevsky A, Gruenwald I. Does low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy have a physiological effect on erectile function? Short-term results of a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study. J Urol. 2012 May;187(5):1769-75. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.117. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
PMID: 22425129BACKGROUNDMariotto S, de Prati AC, Cavalieri E, Amelio E, Marlinghaus E, Suzuki H. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in inflammatory diseases: molecular mechanism that triggers anti-inflammatory action. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(19):2366-72. doi: 10.2174/092986709788682119.
PMID: 19601786BACKGROUNDWang HJ, Lee WC, Tyagi P, Huang CC, Chuang YC. Effects of low energy shock wave therapy on inflammatory moleculars, bladder pain, and bladder function in a rat cystitis model. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Aug;36(6):1440-1447. doi: 10.1002/nau.23141. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
PMID: 28035695BACKGROUNDZimmermann R, Cumpanas A, Miclea F, Janetschek G. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome in males: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.043. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
PMID: 19372000BACKGROUNDAl Edwan GM, Muheilan MM, Atta ON. Long term efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy [ESWT] for treatment of refractory chronic abacterial prostatitis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jan 6;14:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.12.051. eCollection 2017 Feb.
PMID: 28119778BACKGROUNDChuang YC, Meng E, Chancellor M, Kuo HC. Pain reduction realized with extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of symptoms associated with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome-A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Jun;39(5):1505-1514. doi: 10.1002/nau.24382. Epub 2020 May 11.
PMID: 32394478RESULTImamura M, Scott NW, Wallace SA, Ogah JA, Ford AA, Dubos YA, Brazzelli M. Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 30;7(7):CD013325. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013325.pub2.
PMID: 32734597DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Tsang-Tang Hsieh, MD
Institutional Review Board Chang Gung Medical Foundation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2018
First Posted
August 8, 2018
Study Start
July 4, 2018
Primary Completion
February 26, 2020
Study Completion
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
February 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01