NCT03618966

Brief Summary

Aim of the study is to verify whether neuromuscular magnetic stimulation can improve muscle function in spinal-onset Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
22

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2014

Typical duration for phase_2

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2014

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2016

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 23, 2018

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

July 23, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 1, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosisMuscle diseaseNeuromuscular magnetic stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline to Week 2 in the muscle strength measured by Medical Research Council Muscle Scale (MRC).

    Evaluation of the efficacy of NMMS in improving the muscular strength in ALS patients as measured by MRC-score (numeric scale, normal value: 35 for upper limbs, 40 for lower limbs).

    Baseline to Week 2

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change from baseline to Week 2 in the muscle strength measured by handgrip dynamometry

    Baseline to Week 2

  • Change from baseline to Week 2 in the Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) amplitude from flexor carpi radialis

    Baseline to Week 2

  • Change from baseline to Week 2 in the amplitude of the ACh-evoked currents (IACh) for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

    Baseline to Week 2

  • Change from baseline to Week 2 on levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and Myostatin

    Baseline to Week 2

  • Change from baseline to Week 2 on the diameter size of muscle fibers

    Baseline to Week 2

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Right-real NMMS Group

EXPERIMENTAL

It will receive a real stimulation (rNMMS) of the right arm and a sham stimulation (sNMMS) of the left arm

Device: Neuromuscular magnetic stimulation (NMMS)

Left-real NMMS Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

It will receive a rNMMS of the left arm and a sNMMS of the right arm

Device: Neuromuscular magnetic stimulation (NMMS)

Interventions

It is a non-invasive, stimulation technique that does not induce high-intensity cutaneous electric fields and does not activate skin nociceptors, thus resulting in a painless and better-tolerated procedure. rNMMS is delivered through a high-frequency magnetic stimulator connected to a conventional circular cooled coil. Magnetic stimulator is placed above the flexor muscles of the forearm. rNMMS is delivered at a 5-Hz frequency and with a 100% stimulation intensity of 100% of the maximum intensity in 140 trains of 50 stimuli. sNMMS is delivered with a sham coil producing similar acoustic sensations and mechanical skin perceptions.

Left-real NMMS GroupRight-real NMMS Group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • diagnosis of probable or definite ALS with spinal-onset
  • right-handed patients
  • a bilateral symmetric muscular deficit in flexor carpi radialis muscle or flexor digitorum profundus muscle (defined by a MRC Muscle Scale score of 3-4/5)

You may not qualify if:

  • history of epilepsy or severe headaches,
  • pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • patients with implanted cardiac pacemaker, neurostimulators, surgical clips or medical pumps
  • presenting any other comorbid condition affecting the possibility of completing the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (13)

  • Musaro A. Understanding ALS: new therapeutic approaches. FEBS J. 2013 Sep;280(17):4315-22. doi: 10.1111/febs.12087. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

    PMID: 23217177BACKGROUND
  • Taylor JP, Brown RH Jr, Cleveland DW. Decoding ALS: from genes to mechanism. Nature. 2016 Nov 10;539(7628):197-206. doi: 10.1038/nature20413.

    PMID: 27830784BACKGROUND
  • Dadon-Nachum M, Melamed E, Offen D. The "dying-back" phenomenon of motor neurons in ALS. J Mol Neurosci. 2011 Mar;43(3):470-7. doi: 10.1007/s12031-010-9467-1. Epub 2010 Nov 7.

    PMID: 21057983BACKGROUND
  • Dupuis L, Loeffler JP. Neuromuscular junction destruction during amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: insights from transgenic models. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;9(3):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Apr 20.

    PMID: 19386549BACKGROUND
  • Dobrowolny G, Aucello M, Rizzuto E, Beccafico S, Mammucari C, Boncompagni S, Belia S, Wannenes F, Nicoletti C, Del Prete Z, Rosenthal N, Molinaro M, Protasi F, Fano G, Sandri M, Musaro A. Skeletal muscle is a primary target of SOD1G93A-mediated toxicity. Cell Metab. 2008 Nov;8(5):425-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.09.002.

    PMID: 19046573BACKGROUND
  • Loeffler JP, Picchiarelli G, Dupuis L, Gonzalez De Aguilar JL. The Role of Skeletal Muscle in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 2016 Mar;26(2):227-36. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12350.

    PMID: 26780251BACKGROUND
  • Palma E, Inghilleri M, Conti L, Deflorio C, Frasca V, Manteca A, Pichiorri F, Roseti C, Torchia G, Limatola C, Grassi F, Miledi R. Physiological characterization of human muscle acetylcholine receptors from ALS patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):20184-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117975108. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

    PMID: 22128328BACKGROUND
  • Palma E, Reyes-Ruiz JM, Lopergolo D, Roseti C, Bertollini C, Ruffolo G, Cifelli P, Onesti E, Limatola C, Miledi R, Inghilleri M. Acetylcholine receptors from human muscle as pharmacological targets for ALS therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 15;113(11):3060-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600251113. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

    PMID: 26929355BACKGROUND
  • Kern H, Barberi L, Lofler S, Sbardella S, Burggraf S, Fruhmann H, Carraro U, Mosole S, Sarabon N, Vogelauer M, Mayr W, Krenn M, Cvecka J, Romanello V, Pietrangelo L, Protasi F, Sandri M, Zampieri S, Musaro A. Electrical stimulation counteracts muscle decline in seniors. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Jul 24;6:189. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00189. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25104935BACKGROUND
  • Eusebi F, Palma E, Amici M, Miledi R. Microtransplantation of ligand-gated receptor-channels from fresh or frozen nervous tissue into Xenopus oocytes: a potent tool for expanding functional information. Prog Neurobiol. 2009 May;88(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Feb 7.

    PMID: 19428960BACKGROUND
  • Musaro A, McCullagh K, Paul A, Houghton L, Dobrowolny G, Molinaro M, Barton ER, Sweeney HL, Rosenthal N. Localized Igf-1 transgene expression sustains hypertrophy and regeneration in senescent skeletal muscle. Nat Genet. 2001 Feb;27(2):195-200. doi: 10.1038/84839.

    PMID: 11175789BACKGROUND
  • Scicchitano BM, Rizzuto E, Musaro A. Counteracting muscle wasting in aging and neuromuscular diseases: the critical role of IGF-1. Aging (Albany NY). 2009 May 13;1(5):451-7. doi: 10.18632/aging.100050.

    PMID: 20157530BACKGROUND
  • Trendelenburg AU, Meyer A, Rohner D, Boyle J, Hatakeyama S, Glass DJ. Myostatin reduces Akt/TORC1/p70S6K signaling, inhibiting myoblast differentiation and myotube size. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2009 Jun;296(6):C1258-70. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00105.2009. Epub 2009 Apr 8.

    PMID: 19357233BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisMuscular Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMotor Neuron DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseasesTDP-43 ProteinopathiesNeuromuscular DiseasesProteostasis DeficienciesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Maurizio Inghilleri, Prof

    Department of Human Neuroscience, Umberto I Hospital-University of Rome Sapienza

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
All the electrophysiological experiments will be performed in double-blind fashion.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients will be randomized in two groups by receiving a sequential number according to a from a computer-generated random list. A first group will receive a real stimulation (rNMMS) of the right arm and a sham stimulation (sNMMS) of the left arm; a second group received a rNMMS of the left arm and a sNMMS of the right arm. Every cycle of stimulation will last two weeks. All patients will undergo a medial nerve conduction study (NCS) and a clinical evaluation before and at the end of the treatment and another evaluation after two weeks after the end of treatment. Clinical examination will include i) handgrip strength test for the measure of maximal isometric strength of hand and flexor forearm muscles; ii) MRC Muscle Scale for manual muscular testing of the upper limbs. At the end of the stimulation procedure, a needle muscle biopsy under a local anesthetic will be performed bilaterally from flexor carpi radialis muscle for histological, physiological and molecular studies.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2018

First Posted

August 7, 2018

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion

May 1, 2016

Study Completion

November 1, 2017

Last Updated

August 7, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08