Technique of Restriction of Blood Flow Associated With the Ergonomic Cycle of Upper Limbs in Women
Kaatsu-BFR
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Finding alternatives to improve variables such as strength and anaerobic resistance is a subject of highly studied clinical intervention. The use of vascular occlusion associated with physical exercise has shown efficacy in improving these aspects. The objective is to analyze the effectiveness of upper limb training with vascular occlusion (Kaatsu training) for the improvement of isometric strength and anaerobic capacity in women aged 18 to 38 years. Study design. Randomized, prospective, single-blind, follow-up clinical study. The selected sample will be randomized into two groups: experimental and control. The intervention will consist of ergonomic exercises with and without vascular occlusion. Isometric strength will be assessed with a manual dynamometer, anaerobic capacity and peak power (anaerobic alactic system) and average power (anaerobic lactic system) with the wingate test, and subjective perception of effort with the Borg scale. The intervention will last 4 weeks, with 3 weekly sessions of 10 minutes each. A descriptive statistical analysis will be carried out among the dependent and independent variables of both groups. With the Kolmogórov distribution normality test and with the Anova and t-student tests for analysis of repeated measures. Expected results. The investigators intend to observe improvement of isometric biceps and triceps strength and the anaerobic capacity of the group treated with vascular occlusion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 2, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2018
CompletedNovember 27, 2018
November 1, 2018
1 month
August 1, 2018
November 23, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline isometric strength of biceps after treatment and at 1 month
A Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System force dynamometer (model 01165, USA) was used. The subject was standing with the trunk straight, the shoulders in neutral position with the arms aligned to the trunk and the elbows in 90 degrees of flexion. The evaluator requested a maximum voluntary isometric muscle contraction in elbow flexion, maintaining it for 5 seconds. Three repetitions were performed, with 5 minutes of rest between each series, the reference value being the average of the value obtained between the 3 repetitions.
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit]
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change from baseline isometric strength of triceps after treatment and at 1 month
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
Change from baseline peak power after treatment and at 1 month
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
Change from baseline relative power peak after treatment and at 1 month
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
Change from baseline medium power after treatment and at 1 month
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
Change from baseline relative medium power after treatment and at 1 month
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention lasted 17 minutes each session, 2 weekly sessions were carried out, during 4 weeks. The training started with a warm-up on the hand bike without a load for 5 minutes. Later, we did a work of 3 series of 30 seconds, in maximum power, with 5 minutes of rest between them. The intensity was calculated by 0.048 kp.kg. The subjects of the experimental group made use of the restriction of blood flow, using a pressure cuff coupled in the most proximal region of the arm, 10 cm wide. The pressure was calculated based on the initial systolic pressure of the subjects.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention lasted 17 minutes each session, 2 weekly sessions were carried out, during 4 weeks. The training started with a warm-up on the hand bike without a load for 5 minutes. Later, we did a work of 3 series of 30 seconds, in maximum power, with 5 minutes of rest between them. The intensity was calculated by 0.048 kp.kg. The subjects in the control group did not use pressure cuffs.
Interventions
The intervention lasted 17 minutes each session, 2 weekly sessions were carried out, during 4 weeks. The training started with a warm-up on the hand bike without a load for 5 minutes. Later, we did a work of 3 series of 30 seconds, in maximum power, with 5 minutes of rest between them. The intensity was calculated by 0.048 kp.kg. The subjects of the experimental group made use of the restriction of blood flow, using a pressure cuff coupled in the most proximal region of the arm, 10 cm wide. The pressure was calculated based on the initial systolic pressure of the subjects.
The intervention lasted 17 minutes each session, 2 weekly sessions were carried out, during 4 weeks. The training started with a warm-up on the hand bike without a load for 5 minutes. Later, we did a work of 3 series of 30 seconds, in maximum power, with 5 minutes of rest between them. The intensity was calculated by 0.048 kp.kg. The subjects in the control group did not use pressure cuffs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women
- Between 18 and 40 years old
- Physically active
- Without orthopedic injuries that prevented them from carrying out the exercise protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of chronic musculoskeletal, neurological or cardiorespiratory diseases
- With diagnosis of arterial hypertension, deep vein thrombosis or diabetes
- Pregnant
- Not sign the informed consent document
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal Victoria Eugenia Foundation
Madrid, Madird, 28029, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso, PhD
Universidad Europea de Madrid
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2018
First Posted
August 7, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 12, 2018
Study Completion
August 2, 2018
Last Updated
November 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share