NCT03617146

Brief Summary

Diabetes distress (DD) is a negative emotional reaction to a diagnosis of diabetes and concerns about the burden of managing diabetes, the risk of complications, and inadequate support system. DD is common among people with diabetes and is strongly associated with poor diabetes self-care and poor diabetes control. Reducing DD should thus be an important component of diabetes management. In line with the growing evidence, the American Diabetes Association now recommends that providers "routinely monitor people with diabetes for diabetes distress, particularly when treatment targets are not met". Despite increased recognition of the need to manage DD, interventions that are both feasible and effective for reducing DD in routine care settings are not yet known. A pilot study showed that health coaching (HC) has some efficacy in addressing DD but no adequately powered study has implemented a pragmatic research design capable of assessing the real-world effectiveness of HC in reducing DD. This study seeks to assess whether HC effectively reduces DD among primary care patients with diabetes, and whether HC is more effective than an educational program targeting DD. The investigators hypothesize that over a 6-month period, patients with poorly controlled diabetes and DD who enroll in and complete at least five HC sessions will achieve higher and clinically significant reductions in DD and HbA1c, and greater compliance with diabetes self-care recommendations than those who receive only an educational program targeting DD as part of usual diabetes care. The two-arm randomized controlled trial for patients with poorly-controlled diabetes is taking place at an academic family medicine practice in Houston, Texas. Both arms will receive usual care, which includes education about DD. In addition, the intervention arm will receive eight HC sessions over a five-month period. The primary outcome measure is reduction in DD over a six month period. Additional outcome measures include changes in glycemic control (HbA1C) and self-care practices (medication adherence, dietary, and physical activity behaviors). The study will also measure satisfaction and willingness-to-pay for HC to determine the extent to which HC, if effective for reducing DD, can be operationalized in similar healthcare settings.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 27, 2018

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 6, 2018

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 25, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 17, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 22, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

July 27, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 20, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Diabetes DistressDiabetes MellitusDiabetes ControlHealth CoachingDiabetes Self-management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diabetes distress score

    Change in diabetes distress score as measured by the diabetes distress scale (DDS). DDS scores range from 1 to 6, with scores that are less than 2.0 being indicative of little or no distress. Hence scores of 2.0 and above are significant and higher values are indicative of worse outcome.

    3 months and 6 months from baseline

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • HbA1c

    3 months and 6 months from baseline

  • Self-care behaviors (medication adherence, dietary practices, and physical activity behaviors)

    3 months and 6 months from baseline

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in the intervention arm will receive the following interventions: Month 1: Diabetes Distress-specific Education. Months 1 to 3: Six 30 to 45-minute telephone-based health coaching sessions targeting diabetes distress reduction and self-care improvement. Month 3: Follow up distress-specific education. Months 4 and 5: Two 30 to 45 minute telephone-based health coaching sessions targeting diabetes distress reduction and self-care improvement.

Behavioral: Health coachingOther: Diabetes Distress-specific Education

Control Arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in the control arm will receive the following interventions: Month 1: Diabetes Distress-specific Education (same as for the intervention arm). Month 3: Follow up distress-specific education (same as for the intervention arm).

Other: Diabetes Distress-specific Education

Interventions

Health coachingBEHAVIORAL

The intervention will seek to help participants express their diabetes emotional needs and to work with them to figure out what can be done to meet those needs. Depending on the unique needs of each participant, the coaching approach for this study will include: improving motivation and self-efficacy for diabetes management using motivational interviewing and appreciative inquiry; building trust and rapport through mindful listening, open-ended inquiry, and perceptive reflections; and expressing empathy through nonviolent communication. Each participant will receive eight individual coaching sessions over a five month period. All coaching sessions will be delivered over the phone (i.e. telecoaching). The coaching intervention will be done by a certified health and wellness coach.

Also known as: Telecoaching
Intervention Arm

A diabetes distress-specific education that explains what diabetes distress is, why it matters, and its four domains. In addition, the participant is given feedback on his or her distress score and advised on ways to deal with the areas of greatest distress. Participant is linked with resources to overcome any expressed needs. The education is provided by a trained medical assistant.

Control ArmIntervention Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Has had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months
  • Aged 18 to 75 years
  • Most recent HbA1c taken within 30 days was ≥ 8.0
  • At least moderate diabetes distress (a mean score ≥ 2.0 on the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale).

You may not qualify if:

  • Moderately-severe to severe depression: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) score ≥15
  • Other severe mental health disorder (e.g. Alzheimer's, schizophrenia)
  • Current pregnancy
  • Severe diabetes complications or functional deficits (e.g. kidney failure requiring dialysis, amputation, blindness).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Baylor Family Medicine

Houston, Texas, 77098, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Chima CC, Salemi JL, Sidani MA, Zoorob RJ. Coaching and Education for Diabetes Distress (CEDD): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 2;8(4):e12166. doi: 10.2196/12166.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Charles Chima

    Baylor College of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Due to the nature of the behavioral intervention, neither participants nor clinic staff can be blinded to allocation. However, to avoid bias in assessing outcomes, the analyst who will abstract the outcomes data from the electronic health record will not have access to information about the allocation. Hence retrieval of data on baseline and follow up diabetes distress scores, HbA1c, and diabetes self-management behaviors, and the creation of the analysis dataset will be done without knowledge or consideration of allocation status.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Adjunct Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2018

First Posted

August 6, 2018

Study Start

June 15, 2018

Primary Completion

February 25, 2020

Study Completion

September 17, 2020

Last Updated

January 22, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-01

Locations