Dementia-specific Intervention of Advance Care Planning
ADIA
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a pilot study that aims to create a dementia-specific intervention of advance care planning (ACP) and test its feasibility and acceptance with min 20 max 30 patient-relative dyads. The intervention is adapted from the Multiprofessional advance care planning and shared decision-making for end of life care (MAPS) Trials 1 and 2 made at the Zurich University Hospital. The study design is longitudinal (historic): all the dyads will be asked to go through the process (4 visits, see 9.3 Procedures at each visit).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable alzheimer-disease
Started Aug 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 3, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedAugust 7, 2018
August 1, 2018
1.2 years
June 21, 2018
August 3, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in participants' anxiety and depression levels
Changes in participants' anxiety and depression levels measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale before (V1) and after (V4) the intervention. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) allow the participant to assess her/his mood according to 24 items. Individual's anxiety and depression levels are calculated by summing the score obtained at the eponym subscales, 0 being no anxiety or depression and 21 high anxiety or depression.
Visit 1 and V4 (=V1 + 4-6 weeks)
Change in participants' decisional conflict level
Changes in participants' decisional conflict levels measured with the Decisional conflict scale before (V1) and after (V4) the intervention. The decisional conflict scale allow to participant to assess her/his ambivalence towards a specific treatment decision by choosing on a Lickert scale whether s/he strongly agrees (0 points), agrees (1 point), neither agrees nor disagrees (2 points), disagrees (3 points), or strongly disagrees (4 points) with a list of sentences. Scores are then summed, divided by 16 and multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict).
Visit 1 and V4 (=V1 + 4-6 weeks)
Change in proxies' perception of the burden
Changes in relative's perceptions of the burden measured with the Zarit Burden Inventory before (V1) and after (V4) the intervention. The Zarit Burden Inventory assesses relative's perceived burden of taking care of a sick and/or dependent loved one. Relatives have to answer to indicate if they experienced 22 different situations or feelings never (1 point), rarely (2 points), sometimes (3 points), quite frequently (4 points), or nearly always (5 points). Points at each item are summed: scores range from 22 (low perceived burden) to 110 (high perceived burden).
Visit 1 and V4 (=V1 + 4-6 weeks)
Changes in patients' psychological autonomy and perceived control
Changes in perceptions of patient's personal autonomy measured with the Psychological Autonomy Inventory before (V1) and after (V4) the intervention. The Psychological Autonomy Inventory allows the patient to indicate on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 being never and 5 all the time) how s/he feels autonomous in different aspects of life. Scores at the subscale of decisional control (items 3, 7, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 27, and 28) are summed. Items at the subscale of behavioral control (items 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 17, 21, 22, 23, and 24) are summed. A score of 14 means low decisional or behavioral control, a score of 70 means high decisional or behavioral control.
Visit 1 and V4 (=V1 + 4-6 weeks)
Participants' satisfaction with the intervention
Semi-structured interview at V4 explores dyad's experience with the intervention, whether advance decisions were documented during or after the intervention and how, and comments and suggestions to improve the intervention.
Visit 1 and V4 (=V1 + 4-6 weeks)
Study Arms (1)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALsee detailed description
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 65 years
- Having been diagnosed with an early-stage dementia of Alzheimer's disease aetiology or mixed Alzheimer-vascular aetiology (Montreal cognitive assessement (MoCA) \> 20 and Clinical dementia rating (CDR) \< 1.5);
- Having been informed about the diagnosis by their treating physician and that are regularly followed by him/her;
- Patient that show interest in advance care planning or advance directives;
- Patients with psychiatric disorders can be included if their psychiatric symptoms are controlled and under the supervision of their psychiatrist at the Unit of psychogeriatric care;
- Retaining full decision-making capacity according to the MoCA \> 20 or the clinical judgement a physician or psychologist. During the study, the PI and the facilitators will monitor patient's decision-making capacity clinically;
- Having the necessary French language competencies to engage in conversations;
- Having a close family caregiver over 18 years old, who is informed about the patient's diagnosis, possesses the before mentioned cognitive and communication skills, and is willingly to participate to this pilot intervention;
- Informed Consent for both members of the dyad as documented by signature;
You may not qualify if:
- Patients that have a dementia associated with fronto-temporal lobe degeneration;
- Patients that have mild cognitive impairments (MCI);
- Patients that have moderate to severe cognitive disorders, anosognosia or else, assessed clinically or through scales or based on in-person screening, that suggest decision-making capacity may be impaired;
- The patient or her/his caregiver decide to withdraw from the study;
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons.
- Patients that have a dementia associated with fronto-temporal lobe degeneration;
- Patients that have MCI;
- Patients that have moderate to severe cognitive disorders, anosognosia or else, assessed clinically or through scales or based on in-person screening, that suggest decision-making capacity may be impaired;
- The patient or her/his caregiver decide to withdraw from the study;
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lausanne University Hospital
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Bosisio F, Sterie AC, Rubli Truchard E, Jox RJ. Implementing advance care planning in early dementia care: results and insights from a pilot interventional trial. BMC Geriatr. 2021 Oct 19;21(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02529-8.
PMID: 34666711DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2018
First Posted
August 3, 2018
Study Start
August 3, 2018
Primary Completion
September 30, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
August 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared outside of the research group or for other studies