High-dose Vitamin D Supplements in Older Adults
Phase II RCT of High-dose Vitamin D Supplements in Older Adults
2 other identifiers
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This Phase II randomized clinical trial aims to test if supplementation with high dose oral vitamin D will successfully correct vitamin D insufficiency, compared to treatment with standard (RDA) dose vitamin D in a diverse community-based elderly cohort. The effect of high-dose vs. standard-dose vitamin D on altering cognitive trajectories will also be assessed and data will be expected to be used in designing a potential definitive Phase III trial in elderly groups at risk for dementia. A total of 180 elderly persons with longitudinal biomarkers, neuropsychological testing and brain MRI scans will be enrolled, with 152 (\~50 with MCI, 50 with mild AD and 50 with no cognitive impairment) expected to complete the 3½-year study. One-half of each diagnostic group will be randomized to treatment with high-dose vitamin D3 (4,000 IU daily) or to standard dose Vitamin D (600 IU capsule daily + \~200 IU dietary = \~800 IU total/day). Longitudinal MRI analyses will provide an estimate of the treatment effect size on brain atrophy rate. Vitamin D receptor genotype polymorphisms and their impact on response to oral supplementation will also be examined. If vitamin D supplementation improves cognitive outcome, this could have a large impact on the public health, since low vitamin D status is a common, readably treatable condition which may provide a novel window to prevent dementia and AD. Furthermore, the higher prevalence of AD and dementia in African Americans and Latinos could be partially attributable to vitamin D insufficiency.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 18, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
March 30, 2025
March 1, 2025
7.8 years
June 13, 2018
March 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Correction of VitD insufficiency
Correction of VitD insufficiency in all subjects treated with high dose VitD (defined as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D ≥ 20.0 ng/ml)
Expect vitamin D levels to correct by 1-2 month on treatment
SENAS Executive Function Composite Score
Change in SENAS executive function score from Baseline Visit to last Visit (month 42)
3.5 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate effect of VitD on Cognitive Change
3.5 years
Study Arms (2)
High Dose Vitamin D3
EXPERIMENTALReceives 4000 IU daily Vitamin D3 tablets.
Standard Dose Vitamin D3
ACTIVE COMPARATORReceives 600 IU Vitamin D3 tablets.
Interventions
One-half of each diagnostic group will be randomized to treatment with high-dose vitamin D3 or to standard dose Vitamin D
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In order to be included in the No Cognitive Impairment (NC) subgroup, an individual must show no significant cognitive impairment on the baseline neuropsychological tests. Diagnoses are made by a comprehensive case conference review, including investigators from both sites, resulting in a consensus diagnosis made according to current research criteria. We will also require a minimum MOCA score of 23 or above for those with education \>12 y, or MOCA \>20 (uncorrected score) for those with education \<12 years. These subjects are expected to mostly have CDR global scores of 0, but we will not exclude CDR=0.5, as long as Peterson criteria (Petersen, Journal of Internal Medicine 2004) for MCI (amnestic or non-amnestic) are not met and the CDR-Sum of Boxes is \<1.0. Similarly, we will not exclude elderly with subjective memory complaints from the NC group.
- In order to be included in the Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) subgroup, a participant will need to meet research criteria for amnestic MCI, either single-domain or multiple-domain (McKhann et al, Neurology 1984). Thus, participants with amnestic MCI will have standardized memory scores \>1.5 SDs below average, and if cognitive scores in other cognitive domains are also \>1.5 SDs below average they will be classified as multiple-domain amnestic MCI. All MCI participants will be required to have a global CDR=0.5. In addition, we will require a minimum MOCA score of \>20 for those with education \>12 y, or MOCA \>17 (uncorrected score) for those with education \<12 years.
- In order to be included in the Mild AD dementia subgroup, a participant will need to meet research criteria for probable or possible AD (McKhann et al, Neurology 1984). A global CDR score of 1 will be required (mild dementia). In addition, we will require a minimum MOCA score of \>15 at entry for those with education \>12 y, or MOCA \>12 (uncorrected score) for those with education \<12 y. AD therapies will be allowed (e.g. donepezil, memantine) as long as doses have been stable for \>6 weeks, and no changes in doses or CNS active medications are planned while participating in this trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, Davislead
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of California, Davis Alzheimer's Disease Center
Walnut Creek, California, 94598, United States
Related Publications (16)
Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Gallagher JC, Gallo RL, Jones G, Kovacs CS, Mayne ST, Rosen CJ, Shapses SA. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jan;96(1):53-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2704. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
PMID: 21118827BACKGROUNDMungas D, Reed BR, Crane PK, Haan MN, Gonzalez H. Spanish and English Neuropsychological Assessment Scales (SENAS): further development and psychometric characteristics. Psychol Assess. 2004 Dec;16(4):347-59. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.4.347.
PMID: 15584794BACKGROUNDFarias ST, Mungas D, Reed BR, Cahn-Weiner D, Jagust W, Baynes K, Decarli C. The measurement of everyday cognition (ECog): scale development and psychometric properties. Neuropsychology. 2008 Jul;22(4):531-44. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.4.531.
PMID: 18590364BACKGROUNDAnnweiler C, Allali G, Allain P, Bridenbaugh S, Schott AM, Kressig RW, Beauchet O. Vitamin D and cognitive performance in adults: a systematic review. Eur J Neurol. 2009 Oct;16(10):1083-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02755.x. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
PMID: 19659751BACKGROUNDAnnweiler C, Dursun E, Feron F, Gezen-Ak D, Kalueff AV, Littlejohns T, Llewellyn DJ, Millet P, Scott T, Tucker KL, Yilmazer S, Beauchet O. 'Vitamin D and cognition in older adults': updated international recommendations. J Intern Med. 2015 Jan;277(1):45-57. doi: 10.1111/joim.12279. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
PMID: 24995480BACKGROUNDLittlejohns TJ, Henley WE, Lang IA, Annweiler C, Beauchet O, Chaves PH, Fried L, Kestenbaum BR, Kuller LH, Langa KM, Lopez OL, Kos K, Soni M, Llewellyn DJ. Vitamin D and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2014 Sep 2;83(10):920-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000755. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
PMID: 25098535BACKGROUNDAnnweiler C, Fantino B, Schott AM, Krolak-Salmon P, Allali G, Beauchet O. Vitamin D insufficiency and mild cognitive impairment: cross-sectional association. Eur J Neurol. 2012 Jul;19(7):1023-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03675.x. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
PMID: 22339714BACKGROUNDAnnweiler C, Karras SN, Anagnostis P, Beauchet O. Vitamin D supplements: a novel therapeutic approach for Alzheimer patients. Front Pharmacol. 2014 Jan 28;5:6. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00006. eCollection 2014. No abstract available.
PMID: 24478705BACKGROUNDHooshmand B, Lokk J, Solomon A, Mangialasche F, Miralbell J, Spulber G, Annerbo S, Andreasen N, Winblad B, Cedazo-Minguez A, Wahlund LO, Kivipelto M. Vitamin D in relation to cognitive impairment, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and brain volumes. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 Sep;69(9):1132-8. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu022. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
PMID: 24568931BACKGROUNDMacLaughlin J, Holick MF. Aging decreases the capacity of human skin to produce vitamin D3. J Clin Invest. 1985 Oct;76(4):1536-8. doi: 10.1172/JCI112134.
PMID: 2997282BACKGROUNDBuell JS, Dawson-Hughes B. Vitamin D and neurocognitive dysfunction: preventing "D"ecline? Mol Aspects Med. 2008 Dec;29(6):415-22. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 May 13.
PMID: 18579197BACKGROUNDLlewellyn DJ, Lang IA, Langa KM, Muniz-Terrera G, Phillips CL, Cherubini A, Ferrucci L, Melzer D. Vitamin D and risk of cognitive decline in elderly persons. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jul 12;170(13):1135-41. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.173.
PMID: 20625021BACKGROUNDMiller JW, Harvey DJ, Beckett LA, Green R, Farias ST, Reed BR, Olichney JM, Mungas DM, DeCarli C. Vitamin D Status and Rates of Cognitive Decline in a Multiethnic Cohort of Older Adults. JAMA Neurol. 2015 Nov;72(11):1295-303. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2115.
PMID: 26366714BACKGROUNDvan der Schaft J, Koek HL, Dijkstra E, Verhaar HJ, van der Schouw YT, Emmelot-Vonk MH. The association between vitamin D and cognition: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Sep;12(4):1013-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 May 29.
PMID: 23727408BACKGROUNDHathcock JN, Shao A, Vieth R, Heaney R. Risk assessment for vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jan;85(1):6-18. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.1.6.
PMID: 17209171BACKGROUNDMartins D, Meng YX, Tareen N, Artaza J, Lee JE, Farodolu C, Gibbons G, Norris K. The Effect of Short Term Vitamin D Supplementation on the Inflammatory and Oxidative Mediators of Arterial Stiffness. Health (Irvine Calif). 2014 Jun;6(12):1503-1511. doi: 10.4236/health.2014.612185.
PMID: 25505940BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Olichney, MD
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants receive identically appearing capsules which contain either 4,000 IU (high-dose) or 600 IU (standard-dose) of vitamin D3.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2018
First Posted
August 2, 2018
Study Start
March 18, 2019
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
March 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03