Advance Care Planning: Promoting Effective and Aligned Communication in the Elderly
ACP-PEACE
Improving Advance Care Planning in Oncology: A Pragmatic, Cluster-Randomized Trial Integrating Patient Videos and Clinician Communication Training
2 other identifiers
interventional
13,800
1 country
4
Brief Summary
In this research study, the investigators are working to help oncologists better serve patients by delivering more patient-centered, goal-concordant care that may improve health care delivery. \- It is expected that about 30,000 people will take part in this research study, 29,550 of these patients, the vast majority, will be included only for medical record review.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 11, 2025
CompletedOctober 21, 2025
October 1, 2025
2.6 years
July 25, 2018
May 5, 2025
October 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Advance Care Planning Documentation
Any advance directive (e.g., living will, POLST, etc.) and changes of resuscitation orders or any indication in the EHR of a goals-of-care or advance care planning conversation
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of Participants With CODE Status Limitations
6 months
Rate of Palliative Care Consultation
6 months
Rate of Hospice Use
6 months
Confidence in Future Care
6 months
Communication and Decisional Satisfaction
6 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Advance Care Planning
EXPERIMENTAL-Survey: * A group of older patients with advanced cancer (N=450) will have a survey over the course of the 36 months of recruitment. * Participants will be provided written copies of the questions to follow along during the interviews
Advance Care Planning-Video Declaration
EXPERIMENTALVideo Declaration: * From among this group of 450 participants, the video declaration of preferences activity will be conducted with 240 patients. * For those participants that agree to the video declaration, they will proceed with recording of their video declarations * The RA will begin by reading a standardized introduction to aid the subject do the video
Comprehensive Record Review of ACP
OTHER* A review of Medical orders for resuscitation preferences in the electronic health record * A review of Medical orders for Palliative care consultations preferences in the electronic health record * A review of Medical orders for Hospice use preferences in the electronic health record
Main Study Arm
EXPERIMENTALPatients with cancer being seen at the 30 oncology clinics will be exposed to clinicians who have had communication skills training (Vital Talk) and who are using video decision aids (ACP Decisions). Our main outcome is advance care planning documentation.
Interventions
Communication skills training
ACP Decisions video decision aids
Recording of patient advance care planning videos
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinic eligibility criteria include:
- More than one oncologist
- Serve a patient population that is at least 30% aged 65 or older
- Disease-based oncology clinic
- Subject Eligibility: (for the in-person surveys):
You may not qualify if:
- Adults unable to consent
- Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
- Pregnant women
- Prisoners
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institutelead
- Massachusetts General Hospitalcollaborator
- Boston Medical Centercollaborator
- Northwell Healthcollaborator
- Mayo Cliniccollaborator
- Duke Universitycollaborator
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (4)
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Northwell Health
New Hyde Park, New York, 11040, United States
Duke Health
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (3)
Volandes AE, Chang Y, Lakin JR, Paasche-Orlow MK, Lindvall C, Zupanc SN, Martins-Welch D, Carney MT, Burns EA, Itty J, Emmert-Tangredi K, Martin NJ, Sanghani S, Tilburt J, Pollak KI, Davis AD, Garde C, Barry MJ, El-Jawahri A, Quintiliani L, Sciacca K, Goldman J, Tulsky JA. An Intervention to Increase Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259150. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9150.
PMID: 40343696DERIVEDLakin JR, Gundersen DA, Lindvall C, Paasche-Orlow MK, Tulsky JA, Brannen EN, Pollak KI, Kennedy D, McLeggon JA, Stout JJ, Volandes A; ACP-PEACE Investigators. A Yet Unrealized Promise: Structured Advance Care Planning Elements in the Electronic Health Record. J Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;24(8):1221-1225. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0774. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
PMID: 33826860DERIVEDLakin JR, Brannen EN, Tulsky JA, Paasche-Orlow MK, Lindvall C, Chang Y, Gundersen DA, El-Jawahri A, Volandes A; ACP-PEACE Investigators. Advance Care Planning: Promoting Effective and Aligned Communication in the Elderly (ACP-PEACE): the study protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge trial of older patients with cancer. BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 14;10(7):e040999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040999.
PMID: 32665394DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Stepped-wedge designs present challenges. Our study occurred entirely during COVID. We assessed ACP documentation in the EHR to measure whether the ix could lead to better communication. We didn't assess the quality of the documentation in the entire sample. We were not able to track video use at the patient level that allowed linkage to either patients or EHR-based outcomes. The video decision aids in this trial are intended to support clinicians who have been trained in communication skills.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- James Tulsky, MD, Chair of Suppportive Oncology Department
- Organization
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James A. Tulsky, MD
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2018
First Posted
August 1, 2018
Study Start
April 15, 2020
Primary Completion
November 23, 2022
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
October 21, 2025
Results First Posted
September 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share