Stop-Service to Obviously-Impaired Patrons
SSTOP
1 other identifier
interventional
319
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Responsible Retailing Forum ("RRF") seeks to develop a new intervention, Stop Service to Obviously- Impaired Patrons ("S-STOP"), to reduce the incidence and harm associated with overservice of alcohol. Modeled after RRF's effective program to reduce alcohol sales to minors using Mystery Shopper feedback on staff ID-checking conduct, SSTOP would (1) conduct "Pseudo-Intoxicated" Mystery Shop" ("P-I/MS") inspections of serving establishments, employing actors who seek to purchase an alcohol beverage while showing obvious signs of intoxication, (2) provide licensees with confidential feedback on actual staff conduct and a video link to view the behavior of the P-I/MS that visited their establishments, (3) provide staff with brief online training in the recognition and skillful refusal of service to intoxicated patrons, and (4) provide communities with a measure of the prevalence of overservice. The proposed study will: (1) determine the effectiveness of S-STOP in improving recognition and refusal to serve an obviously- impaired customer. To do this, we will implement S-STOP in 10 pairs of demographically matched college and university communities, employing a cross-over design. After a 3-month baseline, we will implement S- STOP in one community in each pair (Cohort 1), while the second community serves as a control (Cohort 2). After 6 months, we will end S-STOP in Cohort 1 communities but continue inspections to measure the effects of decay; and we will begin S-STOP in Cohort 2. (2) examine how licensees utilize the S-STOP program and the extent to which utilization moderates the effectiveness of the program. To do this, we will measure the number and percentage of managers who visit the S-STOP website and register their staff for training, measure the number of staff that complete the training, and conduct analyses to investigate the dose-response relationship between utilization of the S-STOP program and likelihood of overservice. (3) investigate why some owner/managers did not participate in S-STOP. To achieve this, we will interview 20 owner-managers who did not access the S-STOP website.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2019
CompletedNovember 17, 2020
November 1, 2020
1.7 years
July 18, 2018
November 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Refusal of Service
The primary outcome is service/refusal of service to a pseudo-intoxicated patron.
Once monthly over 9 months (3 months baseline; 3 months Early Intervention; 3 months Delayed Intervention.
Study Arms (2)
Cohort 1-Early Intervention
EXPERIMENTALFollowing baseline, participating outlets in this arm will receive the S-STOP program consisting of Pseudo-Intoxicated Mystery Shops (P-I/MS) with performance feedback for 3 months. After 3 months they will receive no further intervention, but will continue to receive Pseudo-Intoxicated Mystery Shops (P-I/MS).
Cohort 2-Delayed Intervention
EXPERIMENTALFollowing baseline, participating outlets in this arm will receive receive Pseudo-Intoxicated Mystery Shops (P-I/MS) with no feedback. After 3 months they will receive the S-STOP program consisting of Pseudo-Intoxicated Mystery Shops (P-I/MS) with performance feedback.
Interventions
Pseudo-intoxicated patrons will enter each participating establishment and attempt to be served an alcoholic beverage. In the intervention phases, feedback on staff performance will be provided to owners/managers along with supporting materials and a link to a website with a video of a typical pseudo-intoxicated patron. Staff will be provided with a link to a website providing tips for preventing overservice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be server/bartender in sampled on-premises alcohol serving establishment
You may not qualify if:
- Establishment must have at least 3 servers/bartenders on staff.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
RRForum
Waltham, Massachusetts, 02451-0621, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brad Krevor, Ph.D.
Responsible Retailing Forum
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2018
First Posted
August 1, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 30, 2019
Study Completion
August 31, 2019
Last Updated
November 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share