A Comparison Of Block Quality In Anterior And Posterior Approach To Sciatic Nerve Block
1 other identifier
interventional
45
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Co-administration of the sciatic nerve block and femoral nerve block may provide anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. Several approaches to sciatic nerve block have been described. The anterior and posterior approaches are two of the approaches used to make the sciatic nerve block. In our study, n = 20 patients for Group A and n = 25 patients for Group P were included. Then, sciatic nerve block and femoral nerve block were performed to each patient by using anterior or posterior approach randomly. After the block is performed, the sensory and motor block start and end times, the first intraoperative fentanyl requirement time and total amount of fentanyl required, the first Diclofenac sodium requirement time, and the total amount of diclofenac sodium that patients required were determined. As the groups were compared to each other; the time to start sensory block was statistically significantly lower, the first fentanyl requirement time was statistically significantly earlier and the total amount of fentanyl required was statistically significantly lower in Group P. Patient satisfaction, anesthesia quality and surgical quality were statistically significantly higher in Group P. In this study, the investigators concluded that if a patient does not have pain secondary to fracture, posterior approach to sciatic nerve block can be performed, whereas, if a patient has pain secondary to fracture, anterior approach to sciatic nerve block can be performed in order to avoid repositioning.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2013
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 18, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 18, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2018
CompletedJuly 31, 2018
July 1, 2018
1 year
June 11, 2018
July 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of sensorial block start time after sciatic nerve block performed with anterior and posterior approaches.
Sensory block was assessed with a cold application every minute, and the block start time was recorded. When the patient was not receiving any stimulation with cold application on sciatic stimulation area, it was recorded as the start time of the full sciatic sensory block.
up to 20 minutes.
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Comparison of sensorial block end time after sciatic nerve block performed with anterior and posterior approaches.
up to 300 minutes.
Comparison of sensorial block start time after femoral nerve block performed with anterior and posterior approaches.
up to 20 minutes.
Comparison of sensorial block end time after femoral nerve block performed with anterior and posterior approaches.
up to 160 minutes.
Comparison of patient satisfaction
After surgery up to 24 hours.
Comparison of anesthesia quality in groups
After surgery up to 24 hours.
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group A
EXPERIMENTALAnterior sciatic nerve block
Group P
EXPERIMENTALPosterior sciatic nerve block
Interventions
A straight line along the femoral catheter was drawn between the anterior superior iliac spine and the finger palpating the pubic bone, the index finger was placed over the femoral artery pulse, a line was drawn perpendicular to the femoral fold. Over the pulse of the femoral artery, a point 4-5 cm lateral. The sciatic nerve was imaged by USG along the needle route and the needle was advanced to the nerve.
Patient was positioned laterally, with the limb to be blocked uppermost. The lower leg was straight extended and the upper extremity was bent 90° from the knee and was directed forward on the lower straight extended extremity. The patient's greater trochanter and posterior superior iliac spine were palpated and joined with a line, and a line was drawn 4 cm above the first line perpendicular to the caudal line. The USG probe was placed between the greater trochanter and the coccyx at the entry point of the needle and the needle was advanced by imaging the nerve.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who were between the ages of 18 to 65 and were going to be operated due to lateral and/or medial malleolus fracture.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- A single blinded anesthesiologist performed posterior or anterior sciatic nerve block and femoral block and left the operating room 'after the nerve block was completed.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2018
First Posted
July 31, 2018
Study Start
March 18, 2013
Primary Completion
March 18, 2014
Study Completion
December 20, 2014
Last Updated
July 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07