NCT03604523

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to prospectively evaluate the most effective treatment of esophageal dysmotility that alleviates symptoms of dysphagia and improves quality of life. Current practice uses either semi-rigid Savary dilators or balloon dilators for esophageal dilation to treat dysphagia due to esophageal dysmotility. The study aims to show which treatment method is more effective in alleviating symptoms, since there are no other treatments available. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the clinical benefits of each treatment.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 14, 2014

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 26, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 26, 2016

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 26, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 27, 2018

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 13, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

June 26, 2018

Results QC Date

February 17, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Therapeutic Efficacy as Measured by Change in Dysphagia Scale Score

    Therapeutic efficacy of different types of dilators in an esophageal dilation procedure in patients with esophageal dysmotility. This will be evaluated through the use of the dysphagia scale (Knyrim 1993). Minimum score is 0. Maximum score is 4. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. The data presented represent a change from baseline to 6 months calculated as the value at 6 months minus the value at baseline.

    Baseline to 6 months post-procedure

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Participants With Relapse

    Baseline to 6 months

  • Time to Relapse

    Initial intervention to second dilation

  • Diet Dysphagia Score Change

    baseline to 6 months post procedure

Study Arms (2)

Dilation by Balloon

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Esophageal dilation by balloon device.

Device: Dilation by Balloon

Dilation by Semi-rigid Savary

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Esophageal dilation by semi-rigid savary device.

Device: Dilation by Semi-rigid Savary

Interventions

Esophageal dilation by balloon device.

Dilation by Balloon

Esophageal dilation by semi-rigid savary device

Dilation by Semi-rigid Savary

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \> 18 years old
  • Dysphagia to liquids and/or solids
  • Diagnosis of esophageal dysmotility
  • Normal endoscopic exam

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of achalasia
  • Defined strictures or webs
  • Vulnerable populations:
  • Adults unable to consent (Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers), Pregnant women, Prisoners)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UMass Memorial Medical Center

Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Motility Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Deglutition DisordersEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Recruitment was much slower than planned and the study was terminated early with only 15.6% of overall study goal enrolled. Early termination led to small numbers of subjects analyzed. Subjects unable to be reached for followup led to missing data for outcome measures.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. David Cave
Organization
UMass Medical School

Study Officials

  • David Cave, MD

    Professor of Medicine, UMass Medical School

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants are randomized to procedure, but if participant fails the first procedure they are given the opportunity to crossover to the other arm for a follow up procedure.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2018

First Posted

July 27, 2018

Study Start

August 14, 2014

Primary Completion

November 26, 2016

Study Completion

November 26, 2016

Last Updated

April 13, 2021

Results First Posted

April 13, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations