Study Stopped
Slow enrollment
Esophageal Dysmotility - Prospective Study Evaluating Methods for Esophageal Dilation
Effectiveness of Semi-rigid Savary Dilators vs. Balloon Dilators During Esophageal Dilation in the Treatment of Esophageal Dysmotility
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to prospectively evaluate the most effective treatment of esophageal dysmotility that alleviates symptoms of dysphagia and improves quality of life. Current practice uses either semi-rigid Savary dilators or balloon dilators for esophageal dilation to treat dysphagia due to esophageal dysmotility. The study aims to show which treatment method is more effective in alleviating symptoms, since there are no other treatments available. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the clinical benefits of each treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 26, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 13, 2021
CompletedApril 13, 2021
March 1, 2021
2.3 years
June 26, 2018
February 17, 2021
March 18, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Therapeutic Efficacy as Measured by Change in Dysphagia Scale Score
Therapeutic efficacy of different types of dilators in an esophageal dilation procedure in patients with esophageal dysmotility. This will be evaluated through the use of the dysphagia scale (Knyrim 1993). Minimum score is 0. Maximum score is 4. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. The data presented represent a change from baseline to 6 months calculated as the value at 6 months minus the value at baseline.
Baseline to 6 months post-procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Participants With Relapse
Baseline to 6 months
Time to Relapse
Initial intervention to second dilation
Diet Dysphagia Score Change
baseline to 6 months post procedure
Study Arms (2)
Dilation by Balloon
ACTIVE COMPARATOREsophageal dilation by balloon device.
Dilation by Semi-rigid Savary
ACTIVE COMPARATOREsophageal dilation by semi-rigid savary device.
Interventions
Esophageal dilation by semi-rigid savary device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \> 18 years old
- Dysphagia to liquids and/or solids
- Diagnosis of esophageal dysmotility
- Normal endoscopic exam
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of achalasia
- Defined strictures or webs
- Vulnerable populations:
- Adults unable to consent (Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers), Pregnant women, Prisoners)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UMass Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Recruitment was much slower than planned and the study was terminated early with only 15.6% of overall study goal enrolled. Early termination led to small numbers of subjects analyzed. Subjects unable to be reached for followup led to missing data for outcome measures.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David Cave
- Organization
- UMass Medical School
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Cave, MD
Professor of Medicine, UMass Medical School
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2018
First Posted
July 27, 2018
Study Start
August 14, 2014
Primary Completion
November 26, 2016
Study Completion
November 26, 2016
Last Updated
April 13, 2021
Results First Posted
April 13, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share