Attention Bias Modification Treatment in Social Anxiety
ABMT
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates attention modification in social anxiety and It is comprised by 2 experiments. At experiment 1 socially anxious participants will receive either training away from threatening faces or placebo intervention and at experiment 2 they will receive either one of these 2 groups or training towards threatening faces. At experiment 2 training will be done under state anxiety levels (video-recording of a speech). Anxiety levels (self-reports, physiological and behavioral measures) as well as attentional biases changes will be examined at pre and post - intervention levels plus 6 months follow-up only for experiment 1.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2018
CompletedOctober 30, 2018
October 1, 2018
1.8 years
June 6, 2018
October 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Social Anxiety levels
Experiment 1 \& 2: self-reported questionnaires, with the primary one to be Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory-23.
Pre-treatment (day 1)
Social Anxiety changes
Experiment 1 \& 2: Measured in self-reported questionnaires with the primary one to be Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory-23.
Experiment 1: 4 weeks after the day 1, Experiment 2: 3 weeks after the day 1 (Post-treatment)
Social Anxiety changes
Only for experiment 1: Measured in self-reported questionnaires with the primary one to be Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory-23.
6 months after day 1 (Follow-up)
Attentional Biases
For experiment 1: Assess kind of attentional biases using the dot-probe task (comparison of reaction time to threatening and a neutral stimulus). For experiment 2: Assess kind of attentional biases using the eye-tracking task (measuring eye gaze).
Pre-treatment (day 1)
Attentional Biases changes
For experiment 1: Assess kind of attentional biases using the dot-probe task (comparison of reaction time to threatening and a neutral stimulus). For experiment 2: Assess kind of attentional biases using the eye-tracking task (measuring eye gaze).
4 weeks after the day 1 (Post-treatment)
Attentional Biases changes
Only for experiment 1: Assess kind of attentional biases using the dot-probe task (comparison of reaction time to threatening and a neutral stimulus).
6 months after day 1 (Follow-up)
Physical social anxiety levels
Only for experiment 2: measured through physiological measures, with the primary one to be heart rate.
Pre-treatment (day 1)
Physical social anxiety changes
Only for experiment 2: measured through physiological measures, with the primary one to be heart rate.
3 weeks after the day 1 (Post-treatment)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Social Anxiety levels (clinical interview)
Pre-treatment (day 1)
Physical social anxiety levels 1
Pre-treatment (day 1)
Physical social anxiety levels 2
Pre-treatment (day 1)
Social anxiety changes
4 weeks after the day 1 (Post-treatment)
Physical social anxiety changes 1
3 weeks after the day 1 (Post-treatment)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Training away from threat
EXPERIMENTALExperiment 1 and 2: In the intervention group -training away from threat-, in all angry-neutral faces presentation the probe is presented only after neutral face. Probe type (\< or \>) is not factorially counterbalanced but there is equal possibility of presentation for each of the following: angry-face location, probe location, or actor. Experiment 1: received 8 times (2 times per week for 4 weeks) Experiment 2: received 4 times (2 times for 2 weeks)
Training towards threat
EXPERIMENTALOnly for Experiment 2: The second ABMT condition -training towards threat- is identical to the first one with the exception that in all angry-neutral face presentations the symbol is presented only after threat face. In addition, at the beginning of every session participants will be informed that a random number of participants will have to repeat their speech. They will also be informed that this instruction will be given right after the dot probe task completion. This will be done in order for the participants to maintain their state anxiety but repetition of the speech task will not actually happen at this stage. Experiment 2: received 4 times (2 times for 2 weeks)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORExperiment 1 and 2: In the placebo group, angry-face location, probe location and actor are fully counterbalanced with regards to their presentation. Experiment 1: received 8 times (2 times per week for 4 weeks) Experiment 2: received 4 times (2 times for 2 weeks)
Interventions
Dot-probe task: Pairs of stimuli, angry - neutral face or neutral - neutral faces of the same actor (20 different individuals;10 male, 10 female) are presented horizontally in the centre of the screen (160 trials; 120 angry-neutral and 40 neutral-neutral). Each trial begins with a fixation cross (500 ms), on which the participants are instructed to focus their gaze. After that a pair of faces follows which is presented on the screen for 500ms. After the faces presentation a small visual probe (\< or \>) appears at the same place of one of the two faces. Participants have to determine which symbol appeared by clicking right or left on the mouse as quickly as possible. The target probe remains on the screen until there is a response, which starts a new trial.
Dot-probe task: Pairs of stimuli, angry - neutral face or neutral - neutral faces of the same actor (20 different individuals;10 male, 10 female) are presented horizontally in the centre of the screen (160 trials; 120 angry-neutral and 40 neutral-neutral). Each trial begins with a fixation cross (500 ms), on which the participants are instructed to focus their gaze. After that a pair of faces follows which is presented on the screen for 500ms. After the faces presentation a small visual probe (\< or \>) appears at the same place of one of the two faces. Participants have to determine which symbol appeared by clicking right or left on the mouse as quickly as possible. The target probe remains on the screen until there is a response, which starts a new trial.
Dot-probe task: Pairs of stimuli, angry - neutral face or neutral - neutral faces of the same actor (20 different individuals;10 male, 10 female) are presented horizontally in the centre of the screen (160 trials; 120 angry-neutral and 40 neutral-neutral). Each trial begins with a fixation cross (500 ms), on which the participants are instructed to focus their gaze. After that a pair of faces follows which is presented on the screen for 500ms. After the faces presentation a small visual probe (\< or \>) appears at the same place of one of the two faces. Participants have to determine which symbol appeared by clicking right or left on the mouse as quickly as possible. The target probe remains on the screen until there is a response, which starts a new trial.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \) highly socially anxious students (based on self-report questionnaire)
You may not qualify if:
- suicidal intent,
- substance abuse,
- primary diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder,
- or past schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, organic mental disorder,
- any concurrent psychotherapy,
- changes in medication during the 12 weeks prior to study and
- CBT therapy 6 months before the beginning of treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Cypruslead
- Youth Board of Cypruscollaborator
- Tel Aviv Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus
Nicosia, 1678, Cyprus
Related Publications (2)
Amir N, Beard C, Taylor CT, Klumpp H, Elias J, Burns M, Chen X. Attention training in individuals with generalized social phobia: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Oct;77(5):961-973. doi: 10.1037/a0016685.
PMID: 19803575BACKGROUNDBar-Haim Y. Research review: Attention bias modification (ABM): a novel treatment for anxiety disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;51(8):859-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02251.x. Epub 2010 May 6.
PMID: 20456540BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Georgia Panayiotou, PhD
Associate Prof., Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and investigators were blind with regards to which group participants were allocated.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD Clinical Psychology Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 6, 2018
First Posted
July 26, 2018
Study Start
October 3, 2016
Primary Completion
July 31, 2018
Study Completion
September 30, 2018
Last Updated
October 30, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share