Single Versus Double Injection Costoclavicular Block
A Randomized Comparison Between Single- and Double-injection Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Block
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this trial, the objective is to compare single- and double-injection ultrasound-guided costoclavicular blocks. The rationale behind this idea is that a second local anesthetic injection, inside the costoclavicular space, may compensate for the dynamic cord dispersion seen with the single-injection technique. Thus the research hypothesis is that, compared to its single-injection counterpart, a double injection costoclavicular block will result in a shorter onset time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedAugust 16, 2018
August 1, 2018
4 months
July 1, 2018
August 14, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Onset time of brachial plexus blockade
Onset until a minimal composite score of 14 points in a scale of 0-16 points, evaluating sensitive and motor function of each 4 terminal branches.
Within 30 minutes of block performance
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Performance time during the brachial plexus block
Intraoperative (During block performance)
Number of needle passes
Intraoperative (During block performance)
Procedure pain during the brachial plexus block
Intraoperative (During block performance)
Incidence of surgical anesthesia
Thirty minutes after block performance
Incidence of Adverse events
Intraoperative (During block performance)
Study Arms (2)
Single Injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORLocal anesthetic injection with a mixture of 35 mL of lidocaine 1.0%-bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 µ/mL and dexamethasone 2 mg, in the middle of the three cords of the brachial plexus
Double Injection
EXPERIMENTALLocal anesthetic injection with a mixture of 35 mL of lidocaine 1.0%-bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 µ/mL and dexamethasone 2 mg, in the middle of the three cords of the brachial plexus as well as at the intersection of the subclavian artery and the medial cord.
Interventions
Local anesthetic injection with a mixture of 35 mL of lidocaine 1.0%-bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 µ/mL and dexamethasone 2 mg, in the middle of the three cords of the brachial plexus
Local anesthetic injection with a mixture of 35 mL of lidocaine 1.0%-bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 µ/mL and dexamethasone 2 mg, in the middle of the three cords of the brachial plexus as well as at the intersection of the subclavian artery and the medial cord.
lidocaine 1.0%-bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 µ/mL and dexamethasone
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age between 18 and 75 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3
- body mass index between 18 and 30
You may not qualify if:
- adults who are unable to give their own consent
- pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination)
- coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or partial thromboplastin time ≥ 50)
- renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100)
- hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100)
- allergy to local anesthetic
- pregnancy
- prior surgery in the infraclavicular costoclavicular region
- chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3G-1A4, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Layera S, Aliste J, Bravo D, Fernandez D, Garcia A, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Single- versus double-injection costoclavicular block: a randomized comparison. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Mar;45(3):209-213. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101167. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
PMID: 31941792DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
De Q Tran, MD, FRCPC
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will not be allowed to see the ultrasound screen. Outcome assessors will not be present during the performance of the block.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2018
First Posted
July 23, 2018
Study Start
July 30, 2018
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share