NCT03593486

Brief Summary

This research has two main specific aims. First, a commercially-available stimulator will be utilized to assess the effect of low-level electromagnetic field (EMF) stimulation on atrial fibrillation (AF) inducibility in patients with paroxysmal AF presenting for catheter ablation as compared to sham stimulation. We hypothesize a reduction in AF inducibility in patients treated with EMF stimulation. Second, we aim to assess for the effect of low-level EMF on level of systemic inflammatory mediators. We hypothesize a reduction in the level of the inflammatory mediator tissue necrosis factor (TNF)-α in patients treated with EMF stimulation as compared to sham stimulation. The long-term objective of this research is to develop low-level EMF as a therapeutic alternative for patients with AF, and this research will help to determine the efficacy of low-level pulsed EMF in this regard.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2018

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 27, 2018

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 26, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 26, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

December 20, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

June 24, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in duration of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation

    Change in the duration of atrial fibrillation that is induced by burst-pacing compared between the two groups before and after the stimulation period.

    60 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of pacing attempts required to induce AF

    60 minutes

  • AF Cycle length

    60 minutes

  • TNF-alpha levels

    60 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Active Stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive active EMF stimulation through the study device for 60 minutes during the procedure.

Device: Low-level Pulsed EMF

Sham Stimulation

SHAM COMPARATOR

The participant will be positioned in the stimulator, but no EMF stimulation will be delivered.

Device: Sham Stimulation

Interventions

Low-level pulsed electromagnetic field stimulator delivered through a Helmholtz coil positioned around the participant's head and neck. Stimulation parameters are 0.032 µG at 0.89 Hz for 60 minutes.

Active Stimulation

The stimulator will be placed around the participant's head and neck, but no EMF will be delivered.

Sham Stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients aged 21-85 presenting for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (episodes of atrial fibrillation lasting \< 7 days with or without prior cardioversion)

You may not qualify if:

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 40%
  • Stroke or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
  • Greater than moderate valvular stenosis or regurgitation as assessed by pre-procedure transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)
  • Presence of a prosthetic heart valve.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

OU Health Sciences Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Wang S, Zhou X, Wang Z, Huang B, Zhou L, Chen M, Yu L, Jiang H. Magnetic fields in noninvasive heart stimulation: A novel approach for anti-atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2015;190:54-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.155. Epub 2015 Apr 21. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25912123BACKGROUND
  • Chen PS, Chen LS, Fishbein MC, Lin SF, Nattel S. Role of the autonomic nervous system in atrial fibrillation: pathophysiology and therapy. Circ Res. 2014 Apr 25;114(9):1500-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303772.

    PMID: 24763467BACKGROUND
  • Scherlag BJ, Yamanashi WS, Hou Y, Jacobson JI, Jackman WM, Lazzara R. Magnetism and cardiac arrhythmias. Cardiol Rev. 2004 Mar-Apr;12(2):85-96. doi: 10.1097/01.crd.0000094029.10223.2f.

    PMID: 14766023BACKGROUND
  • Yu L, Dyer JW, Scherlag BJ, Stavrakis S, Sha Y, Sheng X, Garabelli P, Jacobson J, Po SS. The use of low-level electromagnetic fields to suppress atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):809-17. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.022. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

    PMID: 25533588BACKGROUND
  • Stavrakis S, Humphrey MB, Scherlag BJ, Hu Y, Jackman WM, Nakagawa H, Lockwood D, Lazzara R, Po SS. Low-level transcutaneous electrical vagus nerve stimulation suppresses atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 10;65(9):867-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.026.

    PMID: 25744003BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Sunny Po, MD, PhD

    University of Oklahoma

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants will be randomly assigned to either the active or sham stimulation group. Because the parameters are programmed into the stimulator by the manufacturer and given generic names (Stim 1 and Stim 2), the investigators and physicians performing the procedure will not know which protocol is active or sham.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2018

First Posted

July 20, 2018

Study Start

September 27, 2018

Primary Completion

November 26, 2019

Study Completion

November 26, 2019

Last Updated

December 20, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations