Effectiveness of Manual Therapy vs Exercises With Foam Rolling for Tension Headache
MTvsFR-TTH
Effectiveness of a Global Manual Therapy Protocol vs Exercises With Foam Rolling for Tension Headache
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Tension headache (CT) is the most frequent problem within the group of headaches, with a prevalence of 30-78% of the population throughout its life. Regarding this pathology, treatment with manual therapy has been studied a lot, observing the benefits of different techniques separately in elements such as disability, impact or depression. The "Foam Rolling" (FR) is an element widely used in sport that has been studied its applications in terms of hip and knee flexibility after application in muscles such as the quadriceps or hamstrings. In this study the investigators recruited randomized subjects in three groups, one of exercises with RF, another of a protocol of manual therapy (TM) techniques and one control (CTR) with a placebo treatment. There will be 4 treatments, 1 per week, and the data will be collected in 3 moments, pre-treatment, post-treatment and one month after treatment. The investigators will evaluate aspects such as the average pain of headaches, the impact, disability, quality of life, self-satisfaction and pain at the pressure of painful points of the trapezius and suboccipital muscles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2018
CompletedFebruary 20, 2020
February 1, 2020
3 months
June 1, 2018
February 19, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intensity of pain
Visual Analog Scale. The participants are asked to mark the intensity of pain from 1 to 10, with 1 being almost non-existent and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Disability headache
8 weeks
Impact of headache
8 weeks
Pressure pain threshold
8 weeks
Cervical range movment
8 weeks
Body satisfaction
8 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Manual therapy protocol
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatment based on manual therapy with proven evidence.
Foam Rolling protocol
EXPERIMENTALTreatment based on massage with a Foam Rolling
Placebo Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo treatment based on the placement of the hands on the head without intention to treat.
Interventions
Treatment based on manual therapy with proven evidence.
Placebo treatment based on the placement of the hands on the head without intention to treat.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be between 20 and 55 years old.
- CT medical diagnosis.
- Evolution of, at least, 3 months of the CT.
- Suffer, at least, 1 crisis a week.
- Meet, at least, 2 of the following IHS criteria:
- Bilateral location.
- Pressure pain, not pulsating pain.
- Having a mild-moderate pain intensity.
- Pain that is not aggravated by physical activity.
- Minimum duration of 30 'of the TC.
- Accompanied by some associated symptom:
- or Photophobia. or Fonofobia. or mild nausea.
You may not qualify if:
- Have less than 20 years or more than 55.
- Cervical trauma.
- Musculoskeletal problems that may be aggravated by movement.
- Klein test positive.
- Contraindications to receive manual therapy.
- Musculoskeletal problems that may give another type of headache.
- Problems of dizziness.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Faculty of Physiotherapy
Valencia, 46010, Spain
Gemma V Espí López
Valencia, 46010, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2018
First Posted
July 19, 2018
Study Start
August 15, 2018
Primary Completion
November 15, 2018
Study Completion
December 15, 2018
Last Updated
February 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02