Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization Versus Plasma Kinetic Vaporization Versus Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate: A RCT
EPPROSTATECT
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To Evaluate and compare the outcome and coast of ejaculation sparing management of BPH using 3 different techniques: PVP, PKVP and TURP. Ejaculation sparing TURP group is considered the standard control group. Evaluation will be carried out through a prospective randomized powered trial
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedJuly 17, 2018
March 1, 2018
1.2 years
May 20, 2018
July 4, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
estimate and compare the ejaculation preservation effect of the 3 techniques (PKVP, PVP and TURP).
assessed by Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ)
1 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
change in flow rate
1 years
postoperative complication
1 year
change in patients' symptoms.
1 year
Study Arms (3)
Photoselective Vaporization
ACTIVE COMPARATORPlasma Kinetic Vaporization
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransurethral Resection Of The Prostate
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization
Ejaculation Preserving Plasma Kinetic Vaporization
Ejaculation Preserving Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Age \>50 years 2. Prostate volume (measured by TRUS): 30-80 gm 3. International prostate symptom score (IPSS )\>15 and quality of life score (QOL)\< 3.
- \. Maximum flow rate of uroflometry \<10 ml/second 5. Patients with active sexual life (or interested) and having the ability to ejaculate and desire to preserve ejaculation.
- \. Failure or intolerance to medical treatment, recurrent urinary infection, urine retention, significant hematuria or deterioration of the upper urinary tract function secondary to BOO.
You may not qualify if:
- Bleeding disorders and patients on anticoagulant treatment
- Histologically proved cancer prostate
- Neurogenic voiding dysfunction
- Lower urinary tract malignancy
- Preoperative ejaculation or sexual dysfunction
- Presence of stricture urethra
- Unfit for spinal anathesia -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Urology & Nephrology Center
Al Mansurah, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2018
First Posted
July 17, 2018
Study Start
March 10, 2018
Primary Completion
June 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
July 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03