A Study to Evaluate the Safety and the Efficacy of EscharEx (EX-02 Formulation) in Debridement of Venous Leg Ulcers
A Multicenter , Prospective, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Adaptive Design Study Performed to Evaluate the Safety and the Efficacy of EscharEx (EX-02 Formulation) in Debridement of Venous Leg Ulcers
1 other identifier
interventional
120
2 countries
22
Brief Summary
This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo controlled, adaptive design study performed to assess the safety and the efficacy of 5% EscharEx (EX-02) compared to Gel Vehicle (placebo) and non-surgical standard of care (NSSOC), in debridement of Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU) (in a ratio of 2:2:1) in debridement of VLU. The main objective of this study is: To assess the safety and the efficacy of EscharEx (EX-02 formulation) compared to Gel Vehicle (placebo) and non-surgical standard of care (NSSOC), in debridement of Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU). 120 randomized adult patients with VLU that fail to heal for 4 weeks to 2 years, and with \>50% non-viable tissue (necrotic/slough/fibrin) on the VLU. The maximum number of patients to be enrolled is 160. The total duration of the study of each participating subject is up to 17 weeks: screening (1 week) + Daily visit period (up to 2 weeks) + Twice-weekly visits period (2 weeks) + Weekly visits period (10 weeks) + closure confirmation (up to 2 weeks, if applicable). Each patient will go through 4 periods during the trial:
- 1.Screening period (2 visits, 7 \[+2\] days apart). Including: recording demographics, medical history and concomitant medications, vital signs, physical examination, clinical laboratory tests, wound photography and assessments and questionnaires (pain, wound status and QoL). During this period, wounds will be treated by standard treatment (e.g. appropriate dressing, compression bandage) per investigator discretion, with the exclusion of mechanical and surgical debridement.
- 2.Daily visits period (up to 8 daily site visits within up to 14 days): During the Daily visit period, the patient will arrive daily to site visits. During each visit, adverse events, concomitant medication, vital signs and pain will be recorded, the wound will be washed, photographed and assessed for wound size (by eKare inSightTM), % of non viable tissue (by clinical assessment), and wound healing status (assessed clinically).
- 3.Twice-weekly visits period (4 visits within 14 days): the patients will be followed twice weekly for two weeks, (4 visits within 14 days). During each visit, safety parameters will be recorded (AEs, concomitant medications, pain, vital signs), the wound will be washed, photographed and assessed for wound size (by eKare inSightTM), % of nonviable tissue (by clinical assessment), and wound healing status (assessed clinically).
- 4.Weekly visits period (up to10 visits within up to 10 weeks): patients will be followed once weekly for 10 weeks or until complete wound closure was achieved, (up to10 visits within up to 10 weeks). During each weekly visit, safety parameters will be recorded (AEs, concomitant medications, pain, vital signs), the wound will be washed, photographed and assessed for wound size (by eKare inSightTM), % of nonviable tissue (by clinical assessment), and wound healing status (assessed clinically).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Dec 2019
22 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 7, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 23, 2022
CompletedNovember 14, 2022
January 1, 2022
2 years
June 20, 2018
November 10, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of complete debridement in EX-02 vs. Gel Vehicle arms, scored dichotomously (yes/no), clinically assessed
The clinical assessor will define complete debridement, after each application during the daily visits period
up to 8 applications, within 14 days
Study Arms (3)
EscharEx (5% EX-02 formulation)
ACTIVE COMPARATORDebridement will be performed with 5% EX-02 for 24±3 hours, up to 8 applications
Gel Vehicle
PLACEBO COMPARATORDebridement will be performed with Gel vehicle for 24±3 hours, up to 8 applications
Non-surgical standard of care (NSSOC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORDebridement will be performed with NSSOC (Santyl or commercially approved Hydrogel) per routine procedures, until complete debridement is achieved
Interventions
Santyl (Enzymatic debridement) or commercially approved Hydrogel
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients, men or women, between 18 and 90 years of age,
- Patients with a VLU (determined by medical history, physical examination, and an ultrasound scan demonstrating venous insufficiency),
- Wound is present for at least 4 weeks but no longer than 2 years.
- The necrotic/slough/fibrin non-viable tissue area is at least 50% of wound area (assessed by clinical evaluation),
- Target wound surface area is in the range of 2-100 cm2 (assessed by eKare inSightTM),
- Patient understands the nature of the procedure, is able to adhere to the protocol regimen, and provides a written informed consent prior to any study procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- Wound size decreased by \> 20% after 1 week of standard-of-care-only period (screening period),
- Patients with more than one leg ulcer, on the leg of the target wound, with an area greater than or equal to 2cm2,
- Signs of clinically significant infection including purulent discharge, deep-tissue abscess, erysipelas, cellulitis, etc.,
- Severely damaged skin (e.g. abrasion, exfoliation) extending \>2 cm around the wound's edge,
- Presence of gangrene, signs of systemic infection, sepsis, or osteomyelitis during screening phase,
- Clinical suspicion of skin cancer (e.g. BCC, SCC, melanoma, sarcoma), which was not ruled out by biopsy,
- Patients with skin disorders unrelated to the wound that are presented adjacent to the wound,
- Patients suffering from chronic skin disorders (Idiopathic Pruritus, Psoriasis, Panniculitis, Pyoderma Gangrenosum, etc.) that might deteriorate as a result of local trauma or debridement,
- Wound has sinus tracts or tunnels extending under healthy tissue (following debridement "un-roofing"- if relevant), or penetrating into joint capsule,
- Vascular operations in proximity to the wound in the last month,
- Patients with primary lymphatic edema,
- A significant decrease in the arterial blood flow of the extremity
- Patients with pre-enrolment wounds which are covered by eschar heavily saturated with iodine or by silver sulfadiazine (SSD) pseudoeschar (i.e. pseudoeschar as a result of SSD treatment),
- History of allergy or atopic disease or a known sensitivity to pineapples, papaya, bromelain or papain, as well as known sensitivity to latex proteins (known as latex-fruit syndrome), bee venom or olive tree pollen,
- Patients with poor nutritional status: albumin \< 2.5g/dl, poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (for diabetic patients; HbA1c \> 12%), anemia (hemoglobin\<8 g/dL), a leukocyte counts \< 3,800// μl or \>15000/μl, platelets \<100,000/μl, abnormal liver function (AST, ALT\>2 x upper limit of normal range), renal failure (Cr \> 2.5 mg/dl), BMI\>48,
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MediWound Ltdlead
Study Sites (22)
ILD Research Center
Carlsbad, California, 92009, United States
Limb Preservation Platform, Inc.
Fresno, California, 93710, United States
Felix Sigal. D.P.M, PC
Los Angeles, California, 90057, United States
Stanford
Redwood City, California, 94063, United States
Center for Clinical Research Inc.
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
Medstar Health Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
C & R Research Services USA, Inc
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134, United States
INTEGRAL - Clinical Trials Solutions
Doral, Florida, 33126, United States
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Barry University Clinical Research
Miami Beach, Florida, 33169, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114-2621, United States
Boston Medical Center/Boston University Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States
South Shore Health System, Center for Wound Healing
Weymouth, Massachusetts, 02189, United States
Advanced Foot & Ankle Center
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119, United States
Atlantic Health System - Overlook Wound Care Center
Summit, New Jersey, 07901, United States
Bey Lea Ambulatory Surgical Center
Toms River, New Jersey, 08753, United States
NYU Winthrop Hospital
Mineola, New York, 11501, United States
Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital
New York, New York, 10025, United States
Stony Brook University Hospital
Stony Brook, New York, 11794, United States
AZH Wound Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53221, United States
Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneva
Geneva, Canton, 1211, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Shoham Y, Snyder RJ, Katz Levy Y, David Zarbiv K, Klinger E, Kramer M, Dove CR, Avrahami R, Reyzelman A, Sigal F, Tovmassian G, Shapira E, Harats M, Perez-Clavijo F, Lantis JC, Cazzell SM, Dhillon YS, Cuffy CA, Egozi D, Vayser D, Singer AJ, Galperin RC, Hanft JR, Martinez C, Shalom A, Toutous-Trellu L, Rosenberg L. Once daily Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement of venous leg ulcers versus gel vehicle (placebo) and non-surgical standard of care: a three-arm multicenter, double blinded, randomized controlled study. EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jul 27;75:102750. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102750. eCollection 2024 Sep.
PMID: 39763591DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding of subjects, study team on sites (e.g. investigators, study nurses etc.) and sponsor team to the assigned treatment will be employed between EX-02 arm and Gel Vehicle arm. Since the NSSOC appearance and dosing regimen are different from that of IMP (EX-02 or Gel vehicle), treatment with NSSOC arm can not be masked to study team or sponsor.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2018
First Posted
July 17, 2018
Study Start
December 2, 2019
Primary Completion
December 7, 2021
Study Completion
March 23, 2022
Last Updated
November 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01