Innovation in Mammography: Tomosynthesis Pathways
IMPETO
1 other identifier
interventional
6,000
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study aims at evaluating the introduction of tomosynthesis in mammography screening, analyzing the benefits, disadvantages and feasibility in current clinical practice. It involves women aged 45-46 that will be divided, by drawing lots, into two groups: one group will do the 2D digital mammography (control group), while the other group (intervention group) will do tomosynthesis. In the intervention group the 2D two-dimensional mammography will be reconstructed starting from tomosynthesis without exposing women to other radiation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable breast-cancer
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 3, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2021
CompletedJuly 16, 2018
July 1, 2018
2 years
June 27, 2018
July 13, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the cumulative incidence of advanced screen-detected cancers (T2 +) and the cumulative incidence of advanced interval cancers (T2 +)
number of T2+ screen-detected cancers divided by all screened women at subsequent round of screening and number of T2+ interval cancers divided by all screened women at subsequent round of screening.
three years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
recall rate
two years
detection rate
two years
benign biopsies rate
two years
cost analysis
two years
Study Arms (2)
2D mammography
ACTIVE COMPARATOR45-46 years old women are invited to attend the usual screening examination (2D mammography). The next year they will be invited to make a 2D mammography, according to screening protocol.
Tomosynthesis
EXPERIMENTAL45-46 years old women are invited to attend the Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) in adjunct to synthetic mammograms (sDM). The next year they will be invited to make a 2D mammography, according to screening protocol.
Interventions
DBT is a x-ray examination that allows to visualize the breast on 3 planes (3D) and therefore to help to see lesions hardly visible to mammography due to the overlap of glandular tissue.
2D mammography is a X-ray examinations used to detect breast cancer in the screening programme.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old women resident in the screening area
You may not qualify if:
- previous breast cancer
- written refusal to participate in the screening programme
- pregnancy, breastfeeding
- presence of prostheses;
- ongoing chemotherapy;
- impossibility to submit the informed consent for linguistic problems or for inability of women to provide informed consent;
- verified presence of BRCA1 - BRCA2 (Breast Related Cancer Antigens 1 - Breast Related Cancer Antigens 2) genetic mutation or involvement in surveillance path for heredo-familial tumor;
- previous known tomosynthesis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
South-Est Local Health Unit
Arezzo, 52100, Italy
Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute
Florence, 50139, Italy
Related Publications (10)
Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fanto C, Valentini M, Montemezzi S, Macaskill P. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):583-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
PMID: 23623721BACKGROUNDSkaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, Izadi M, Jebsen IN, Jahr G, Krager M, Niklason LT, Hofvind S, Gur D. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):47-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121373. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
PMID: 23297332BACKGROUNDGilbert FJ, Tucker L, Gillan MG, Willsher P, Cooke J, Duncan KA, Michell MJ, Dobson HM, Lim YY, Purushothaman H, Strudley C, Astley SM, Morrish O, Young KC, Duffy SW. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone. Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta19040.
PMID: 25599513BACKGROUNDSkaane P, Bandos AI, Eben EB, Jebsen IN, Krager M, Haakenaasen U, Ekseth U, Izadi M, Hofvind S, Gullien R. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):655-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131391. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
PMID: 24484063BACKGROUNDPaci E, Mantellini P, Giorgi Rossi P, Falini P, Puliti D; TBST Working Group. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)]. Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct;37(4-5):317-27. Italian.
PMID: 24293498BACKGROUNDMcDonald ES, McCarthy AM, Akhtar AL, Synnestvedt MB, Schnall M, Conant EF. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Nov;205(5):1143-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14406.
PMID: 26496565BACKGROUNDBernardi D, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, Anesi V, Burlon S, Cauli E, Depaoli M, Larentis L, Malesani V, Targa L, Baldo P, Houssami N. Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time. Br J Radiol. 2012 Dec;85(1020):e1174-8. doi: 10.1259/bjr/19385909.
PMID: 23175484BACKGROUNDBernardi D, Belli P, Benelli E, Brancato B, Bucchi L, Calabrese M, Carbonaro LA, Caumo F, Cavallo-Marincola B, Clauser P, Fedato C, Frigerio A, Galli V, Giordano L, Giorgi Rossi P, Golinelli P, Morrone D, Mariscotti G, Martincich L, Montemezzi S, Naldoni C, Paduos A, Panizza P, Pediconi F, Querci F, Rizzo A, Saguatti G, Tagliafico A, Trimboli RM, Zappa M, Zuiani C, Sardanelli F. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): recommendations from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists (ICBR) by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) and the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa). Radiol Med. 2017 Oct;122(10):723-730. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0769-z. Epub 2017 May 25.
PMID: 28540564BACKGROUNDLang K, Andersson I, Rosso A, Tingberg A, Timberg P, Zackrisson S. Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study. Eur Radiol. 2016 Jan;26(1):184-90. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3803-3. Epub 2015 May 1.
PMID: 25929946BACKGROUNDLang K, Nergarden M, Andersson I, Rosso A, Zackrisson S. False positives in breast cancer screening with one-view breast tomosynthesis: An analysis of findings leading to recall, work-up and biopsy rates in the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Eur Radiol. 2016 Nov;26(11):3899-3907. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4265-y. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
PMID: 26943342BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paola Mantellini, MDr
Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2018
First Posted
July 16, 2018
Study Start
September 3, 2018
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
September 1, 2021
Last Updated
July 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07