Percutaneous Fluoroscopic vs CT Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Spinal Infection and Tumor
Accuracy, Safety and Diagnostic Outcome of Percutaneous Fluoroscopic vs. CT Guided Transpedicular Core Needle Biopsy for Spinal Infections and Tumors. A Prospective Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Spinal biopsy is important to obtain culture and histopathological diagnosis in spine infection and tumors. To date, there is no prospective randomized study comparing both techniques. Therefore, the aim of this prospective randomized trial was to evaluate the accuracy, safety and diagnostic outcome of both these techniques.A prospective randomized trial was performed in 60 patients divided equally into fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy groups. Transpedicular approach was done with 8G core biopsy needle. Specimens were sent for histopathological examinations and cultures. Diagnosis were made based on biopsy results, clinical criteria and disease progression during 6 months follow up. Radiation expose to patients and doctors were measured with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 2, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2018
CompletedJuly 19, 2018
July 1, 2018
1.6 years
June 29, 2018
July 17, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy of fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy
Diagnostic accuracy were determined based on true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative biopsy findings
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Radiation expose to patients and doctors
During biopsy
Pre biopsy and post biopsy pain score assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS)
48 hours post biopsy
Complications of spinal biopsy
During and 48 hours after spinal biopsy
Study Arms (2)
Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORFluoroscopy guided spinal biopsies were done by spine surgeons in the operation theatre using C-Arm fluoroscopy device (OECFluorostar7900Compact - GE®). C-arm image intensifier was positioned until fluoroscopic beam was collinear with the corresponding vertebral body on AP view prior to insertion of biopsy needle
CT guided Spinal Biopsy Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORCT guided spinal biopsies were done by radiologist under guidance of 128-slice CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition AS+, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Preliminary axial CT scanning was done in bone window (window width, WW:2500; window level, WL:500) at the pre-selected levels decided from previous imaging to plan the needle access. Biopsy was then performed under sequential CT-fluoroscopy scan.
Interventions
Spinal biopsy done via Transpedicular approach with an 8-gauge T-Lok™ bone marrow biopsy needle under fluoroscopic guidance. Samples collected were sent to laboratories for histopathological examination (HPE), culture and sensitivity (bacteriology, mycology and acid-fast bacilli), staining (Gram and Ziehl-Neelsen) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Spinal biopsy done via Transpedicular approach with an 8-gauge T-Lok™ bone marrow biopsy needle under CT guidance. Samples collected were sent to laboratories for histopathological examination (HPE), culture and sensitivity (bacteriology, mycology and acid-fast bacilli), staining (Gram and Ziehl-Neelsen) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age more than 18;
- Patients who presented with clinical symptoms and radiological features suggestive of infection or malignancy;
- MRI reported as probable infection or tumour.
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical spine lesion;
- Significant neurological deficit that required urgent surgery;
- Partially treated spinal infections;
- Vascular tumour;
- Infection over skin puncture site;
- Pregnancy;
- Bleeding diathesis;
- Medically unfit for spinal biopsy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Malaya Medical Center
Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Chris Yin Wei Chan
University of Malaya
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Separate individuals completed the random allocation sequence, patient enrollment and outcome assessment. Outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Orthopedic Registra
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2018
First Posted
July 13, 2018
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 2, 2018
Study Completion
June 2, 2018
Last Updated
July 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07