Provider Variability in the Use of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs and Reversal
Importance of Understanding Provider Variability in the Use of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs and Reversal Agents
2 other identifiers
observational
265,537
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The use of neuromuscular blocking agents during surgery is associated with postoperative respiratory complications and increased risk of readmission to the hospital following ambulatory surgery. Understanding the clinical behavior of providers is essential in devising and assessing quality improvement projects since it is primarily individuals who determine the utilization of neuromuscular blocking drugs and reversal agents, not institutions. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to determine the variability between individual anesthesia providers (attending physician, resident, nurse anesthetists) in the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs and reversal agents, using advanced statistical methods to adjust for differences in patient and procedure case mix. The investigators hypothesize that variance between individual anesthesia providers in the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs and reversal agents differs depending on provider type.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2018
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2021
CompletedAugust 25, 2021
August 1, 2021
2.8 years
June 29, 2018
August 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Neuromuscular blocking agents ED95 equivalent dose or reversal agents dose (neostigmine and/or sugammadex)
Neuromuscular blocking agent ED95 equivalent dose defined as the median effective dose required to achieve a 95% reduction in maximal twitch response from baseline.
During surgery, maximum of 24 hours
Other Outcomes (2)
Respiratory Complications
Up to 7 days after surgery
Direct costs of care
During hospital stay, on average 4 days, and no longer than 1 year
Study Arms (1)
Study cohort
The estimated cohort consists of 317.000 adult patients who are intubated for a non-cardiac surgery and extubated at the end of the case at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (205.000) as well as Massachusetts General Hospital (112.000) and received treatment by anesthesia and surgical providers who have completed at least 50 anesthesias and surgeries at their respective institution, respectively.
Interventions
Neuromuscular blocking agent ED95 equivalent dose by provider
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgical procedure that are intubated for surgery and extubated at the end of the case.
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- Non-cardiac surgical procedure
- Endotracheally intubated for surgery and extubated at the end of the case
You may not qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification Status of 5 or 6
- Other surgery within a month prior to the procedure considered
- Missing covariates
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Related Publications (13)
Intercontinental Marketing Services (IMS) Health, Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System (MIDAS), September 2010
BACKGROUNDThevathasan T, Shih SL, Safavi KC, Berger DL, Burns SM, Grabitz SD, Glidden RS, Zafonte RD, Eikermann M, Schneider JC. Association between intraoperative non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agent dose and 30-day readmission after abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Oct 1;119(4):595-605. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex240.
PMID: 29121289BACKGROUNDMurphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):120-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d. Epub 2010 May 4.
PMID: 20442260BACKGROUNDXara D, Silva A, Mendonca J, Abelha F. Inadequate emergence after anesthesia: emergence delirium and hypoactive emergence in the Postanesthesia Care Unit. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Sep;25(6):439-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.02.011. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
PMID: 23965209BACKGROUNDButterly A, Bittner EA, George E, Sandberg WS, Eikermann M, Schmidt U. Postoperative residual curarization from intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking agents delays recovery room discharge. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;105(3):304-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq157. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
PMID: 20576632BACKGROUNDLepouse C, Lautner CA, Liu L, Gomis P, Leon A. Emergence delirium in adults in the post-anaesthesia care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Jun;96(6):747-53. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael094. Epub 2006 May 2.
PMID: 16670111BACKGROUNDLien CA, Kopman AF. Current recommendations for monitoring depth of neuromuscular blockade. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Dec;27(6):616-22. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000132.
PMID: 25251919BACKGROUNDHristovska AM, Duch P, Allingstrup M, Afshari A. Efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 14;8(8):CD012763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012763.
PMID: 28806470BACKGROUNDBrueckmann B, Sasaki N, Grobara P, Li MK, Woo T, de Bie J, Maktabi M, Lee J, Kwo J, Pino R, Sabouri AS, McGovern F, Staehr-Rye AK, Eikermann M. Effects of sugammadex on incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a randomized, controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;115(5):743-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev104. Epub 2015 May 2.
PMID: 25935840BACKGROUNDKotake Y, Ochiai R, Suzuki T, Ogawa S, Takagi S, Ozaki M, Nakatsuka I, Takeda J. Reversal with sugammadex in the absence of monitoring did not preclude residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):345-51. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182999672. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
PMID: 23757472BACKGROUNDMcLean DJ, Diaz-Gil D, Farhan HN, Ladha KS, Kurth T, Eikermann M. Dose-dependent Association between Intermediate-acting Neuromuscular-blocking Agents and Postoperative Respiratory Complications. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1201-13. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000674.
PMID: 25919486BACKGROUNDRudolph MI, Chitilian HV, Ng PY, Timm FP, Agarwala AV, Doney AB, Ramachandran SK, Houle TT, Eikermann M. Implementation of a new strategy to improve the peri-operative management of neuromuscular blockade and its effects on postoperative pulmonary complications. Anaesthesia. 2018 Sep;73(9):1067-1078. doi: 10.1111/anae.14326. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
PMID: 29974459BACKGROUNDLadha KS, Bateman BT, Houle TT, De Jong MAC, Vidal Melo MF, Huybrechts KF, Kurth T, Eikermann M. Variability in the Use of Protective Mechanical Ventilation During General Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):503-512. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002343.
PMID: 28763357BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philipp Fassbender, MD
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2018
First Posted
July 13, 2018
Study Start
June 29, 2018
Primary Completion
March 31, 2021
Study Completion
March 31, 2021
Last Updated
August 25, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08