Preoperative Neuromobilization Exercises for Individuals With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Effects of a Preoperative Neuromobilization Program Offered to Individuals With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Awaiting Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Carpal tunnel syndrome is one of the major known disorders of the wrist and hand that causes pain, tingling sensations, weakness of the hand and functional limitations in daily tasks (for example: handling objects with the hands). In the early stages of the syndrome, some individuals may benefit from wearing wrist splint or cortisone infiltration. For those with ongoing symptoms, surgery is often indicated. However, some individuals may experience worsening of their condition while waiting for surgery. To aid those individuals, physiotherapists often recommend exercises that aim to "glide" the nerve inside the arm. Specifically, these exercises involve arm and neck movements in a specific order, with the aim of improving the motion of the median nerve in relation with its environment. These nerve gliding exercises may have a favorable effect on the median nerve and may improve pain and upper limb functional abilities. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluated the feasibility and effects of a preoperative nerve gliding exercises completed by individuals undergoing surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 7, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 13, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2018
CompletedJanuary 31, 2019
January 1, 2019
2.9 years
June 28, 2018
January 29, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in different pain-related disabilities and cognitive-behavioral factors involved in the experience of pain measured by the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain inventory (WHYMPI)
The WHYMPI is comprised of 52 questions organized into subscales quantifying domains including two subscales specific to pain experience (i.e., pain interference (9 items), and pain severity (3 items)). Each question is rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 and a mean score is computed for each subscale. A higher mean score represents higher disability (e.g., very intense pain or extreme interference). The French version of the WHYPMI has been adapted and validated and has demonstrated good repeatability (ICC \> 0.75) when tested in adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain (Laliberté et al. 2008, Kerns, Turk, and Rudy 1985). The normalized minimal detectable change (MDC) for the WHYMPI for each of the five WHYMPI subscales range from MDC90%=15.4% (pain interference) to MDC90%=22.8% (emotional distress) (Bergström et al. 1999).
Baseline (T0), one month (T1), and two months (T2) following randomization
Change upper limb functional abilities measured with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale
The DASH includes 30 questions covering participation and performance of daily activities with the upper limb as well as symptom severity in individuals with musculoskeletal upper limb disorder. Each question is rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, where a higher weighted score (range 0-100) represents substantial functional limitations. The French version of the DASH has been adapted and validated and has demonstrated excellent repeatability (ICC = 0.91) when tested in adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain (Hudak, Amadio, and Bombardier 1996, Durand et al. 2005). The normalized MDC was established (MDC90% = 10.7%) (Greenslade et al. 2004).
Baseline (T0), one month (T1), and two months (T2) following randomization
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in median nerve cross sectional area at the carpal tunnel inlet measured by quantitative ultrasound imaging
Baseline (T0), one month (T1), and two months (T2) following randomization
Change in median nerve longitudinal excursion at the distal forearm measured by quantitative ultrasound imaging
Baseline (T0), one month (T1), and two months (T2) following randomization
Change in pinch grip strength
Baseline (T0), 4th week (T1), and four weeks following surgery (T2)
Study Arms (2)
Nerve gliding exercise
EXPERIMENTALThree series of 15 daily repetition of the rehabilitation exercise targetting nerve excursion
Control
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention according to current practice.
Interventions
A 4-week home-based nerve-gliding exercise program (NGEP) including isolated and coupled upper limb and neck movements. A specific mobilization was elaborated for each week of the program allowing to gradually increase the range of movement and inter-articular coordination.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- EMG confirmed diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
- Listed for carpal tunnel decompression
You may not qualify if:
- Previous trauma or surgery impairing motion of the upper limb
- Diabetes
- Thyroid disease
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Recent pregnancy (\< 3 months)
- Unable to communicate in English or French
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de l'Université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dany H Gagnon, PT, PhD
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessors will be blind to participant allocation
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2018
First Posted
July 11, 2018
Study Start
September 7, 2015
Primary Completion
August 13, 2018
Study Completion
September 30, 2018
Last Updated
January 31, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication
- Access Criteria
- Data access requests will be reviewed by an external Independent Review Panel. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement
Deidentified participant data that underlie the results submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journal (text, tables, figures, and appendices).