NCT03582540

Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomized comparative multicentric study. Briefly, we will analyze the technical success, performance and clinical outcomes of early versus delayed double-guidewire technique (DGT) in difficult biliary cannulation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

8 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 2, 2016

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 28, 2018

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 11, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 23, 2019

Status Verified

June 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

June 28, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 20, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Biliary cannulation success rate

    The percentage of biliary cannulation success in both arms.

    During the ERCP procedure

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Immediate morbidity

    From the start, until 30 minutes after completion of ERCP

  • Delayed morbidity

    30 minutes after ERCP completion and up to 30 days

  • procedural time

    time from the first guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct up to the end of cannulation.

Study Arms (2)

early double-guidewire technique (DGT)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

First arm: early double-guidewire technique The early arm attempts biliary cannulation using the DGT immediately once the guidewire is inserted in the pancreatic duct in cases of difficult biliary cannulation.

Procedure: Double-guidewire cannulation technique

delayed double-guidewire technique (DGT)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the delayed arm, once the guidewire is inserted in the pancreatic duct, the operator continues to attempt biliary cannulation with conventional technique (contrast- or guidewire-assisted). DGT is used only if 10 more minutes of conventional cannulation technique does not allow biliary access.

Procedure: Double-guidewire cannulation technique

Interventions

With the DGT, a guidewire is first inserted deep into the PD. The cannulation device is then withdrawn, reloaded with a second guidewire, and reinserted through the working channel of the endoscope to cannulate the common bile duct.

delayed double-guidewire technique (DGT)early double-guidewire technique (DGT)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients 18 years old and more
  • Native papilla
  • Clinical indications of ERCP
  • Difficult biliary cannulation defined by unintentional guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct before biliary cannulation is successful
  • Informed consent completed by the patient

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
  • ERCP with direct biliary cannulation success
  • ERCP with inability to cannulate the bile duct nor the pancreatic duct
  • Coagulation or hemostasis disorder (TP \< 60%, TCA\> 40 sec. et plaquettes \< 60000/mm3).
  • Patient under active antiaggregant or anticoagulant medication other than aspirin
  • Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • ERCP performed by another operator than an investigator
  • Patient's voluntary withdrawal
  • Withdrawal decision by the investigator or sponsor

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

Clinique de Bercy

Charenton-le-Pont, 94220, France

Location

Hôpital Dupuytren

Limoges, 87042, France

Location

Hopital Saint Joseph

Marseille, 13008, France

Location

Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses - La Croix Saint-Simon

Paris, 75020, France

Location

Hôpital Haut Lévêque

Pessac, 33600, France

Location

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Pierre-Bénite, 69495, France

Location

Centre Hospitalier de Bigorre

Tarbes, 65013, France

Location

Centre Hospitalier de Vichy

Vichy, 03207, France

Location

Related Publications (24)

  • Adler DG, Baron TH, Davila RE, Egan J, Hirota WK, Leighton JA, Qureshi W, Rajan E, Zuckerman MJ, Fanelli R, Wheeler-Harbaugh J, Faigel DO; Standards of Practice Committee of American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jul;62(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.04.015. No abstract available.

  • Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jan;61(1):112-25. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02463-0. No abstract available.

  • Hisa T, Matsumoto R, Takamatsu M, Furutake M. Impact of changing our cannulation method on the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec 28;17(48):5289-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289.

  • Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, Overby CS, Aas J, Ryan ME, Bochna GS, Shaw MJ, Snady HW, Erickson RV, Moore JP, Roel JP. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Oct;54(4):425-34. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.117550.

  • Artifon EL, Sakai P, Cunha JE, Halwan B, Ishioka S, Kumar A. Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct;102(10):2147-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01378.x. Epub 2007 Jun 20.

  • Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Repici A, Fabbri C, Grilli D, Conio M, D'Imperio N, Bazzoli F. Timing of precut procedure does not influence success rate and complications of ERCP procedure: a prospective randomized comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.037.

  • Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM, Eusebi LH, Ceroni L, Laterza L, Fabbri C, Bazzoli F. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy. 2010 May;42(5):381-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243992. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

  • Parlak E, Cicek B, Disibeyaz S, Kuran S, Sahin B. Early decision for precut sphincterotomy: is it a risky preference? Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Mar;52(3):845-51. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9546-x.

  • Slivka A. A new technique to assist in bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Nov;44(5):636. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70038-x. No abstract available.

  • Gotoh Y, Tamada K, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Ohashi A, Satoh Y, Higashizawa T, Miyata T, Ido K, Sugano K. A new method for deep cannulation of the bile duct by straightening the pancreatic duct. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Jun;53(7):820-2. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.113387. No abstract available.

  • Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, Wong RC, Ferrari AP Jr, Montes H, Roston AD, Slivka A, Lichtenstein DR, Ruymann FW, Van Dam J, Hughes M, Carr-Locke DL. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Nov;56(5):652-6. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.129086.

  • Caletti GC, Vandelli A, Bolondi L, Fontana G, Labo G. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) through artificial endoscopic choledocho-duodenal fistula. Endoscopy. 1978 Aug;10(3):203-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1098295.

  • Siegel JH. Precut papillotomy: a method to improve success of ERCP and papillotomy. Endoscopy. 1980 May;12(3):130-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021728.

  • Osnes M, Kahrs T. Endoscopic choledochoduodenostomy for choledocholithiasis through choledochoduodenal fistula. Endoscopy. 1977 Aug;9(3):162-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1098510.

  • Dumonceau JM, Deviere J, Cremer M. A new method of achieving deep cannulation of the common bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy. 1998 Sep;30(7):S80. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001379. No abstract available.

  • Angsuwatcharakon P, Rerknimitr R, Ridtitid W, Ponauthai Y, Kullavanijaya P. Success rate and cannulation time between precut sphincterotomy and double-guidewire technique in truly difficult biliary cannulation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;27(2):356-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06927.x.

  • Cote GA, Mullady DK, Jonnalagadda SS, Keswani RN, Wani SB, Hovis CE, Ammar T, Al-Lehibi A, Edmundowicz SA, Komanduri S, Azar RR. Use of a pancreatic duct stent or guidewire facilitates bile duct access with low rates of precut sphincterotomy: a randomized clinical trial. Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Dec;57(12):3271-8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2269-2. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

  • Herreros de Tejada A, Calleja JL, Diaz G, Pertejo V, Espinel J, Cacho G, Jimenez J, Millan I, Garcia F, Abreu L; UDOGUIA-04 Group. Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Oct;70(4):700-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.031. Epub 2009 Jun 27.

  • Yoo YW, Cha SW, Lee WC, Kim SH, Kim A, Cho YD. Double guidewire technique vs transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 7;19(1):108-14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i1.108.

  • Xinopoulos D, Bassioukas SP, Kypreos D, Korkolis D, Scorilas A, Mavridis K, Dimitroulopoulos D, Paraskevas E. Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation in a single-session therapeutic ERCP. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr 21;17(15):1989-95. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i15.1989.

  • Lee TH, Hwang SO, Choi HJ, Jung Y, Cha SW, Chung IK, Moon JH, Cho YD, Park SH, Kim SJ. Sequential algorithm analysis to facilitate selective biliary access for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: a prospective clinical study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb 17;14:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-30.

  • Goff JS. Long-term experience with the transpancreatic sphincter pre-cut approach to biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Nov;50(5):642-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)80012-1.

  • Tang SJ, Haber GB, Kortan P, Zanati S, Cirocco M, Ennis M, Elfant A, Scheider D, Ter H, Dorais J. Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2005 Jan;37(1):58-65. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826077.

  • Laquiere A, Privat J, Jacques J, Legros R, Urena-Campos R, Belkhodja H, Subtil C, Kanafi L, Lecomte L, Boustiere C, Katsogiannou M, Karsenti D. Early double-guidewire versus repeated single-guidewire technique to facilitate selective bile duct cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2022 Feb;54(2):120-127. doi: 10.1055/a-1395-7485. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

Study Officials

  • ARTHUR LAQUIERE, MD

    Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients with a difficult biliary cannulation are included in the study if the guidewire is inserted in the pancreatic duct. At that point, patients are randomized in two arms: early versus delayed DGT. The early arm attempts biliary cannulation using the DGT immediately and the delayed arm uses the DGT only if 10 more minutes of conventional cannulation technique does not allow biliary cannulation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Gastroenterologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2018

First Posted

July 11, 2018

Study Start

November 2, 2016

Primary Completion

July 30, 2019

Study Completion

August 30, 2019

Last Updated

September 23, 2019

Record last verified: 2018-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations