Differential Diagnosis Between Parkinson's Disease and Multiple System Atrophy Using Digital Speech Analysis
Voice4PD-MSA
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a relentlessly progressing rare neurodegenerative disease of unknown etiology. In early stages of the disease, PD and MSA symptoms are very similar, particularly MSA-P where Parkinsonism predominates. The differential diagnosis between MSA-P and PD can be very challenging in early disease stages, while early diagnostic certitude is important for the patient because of the diverging prognosis. Voice disorders are a common early symptom in both diseases and of different origin. The ambition and the originality of this project are to develop a digital voice-based tool for objective discrimination between PD and MSA-P.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Jun 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable parkinson-disease
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 18, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 18, 2021
CompletedNovember 28, 2022
November 1, 2022
3 years
October 20, 2017
November 24, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Differences between groups in Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI).
DSI will be calculated with the SESANE software (http://www.sqlab.fr/) and with algorithms developed by GeoStat at Inria. Evaluation of the rhythm voice 1. Vowels: mean frequency (Hz), variation coefficient (%), jitter factor (%), mean intensity (dB), shimmer factor (%), and noise to harmony ratio (dB). 2. Speech prosody: mean frequency (Hz), variation coefficient (%), minimal frequency (Hz), maximal frequency (Hz), dynamic (Hz), mean duration of speech between two pauses (seconds), total amount of syllables (syllables/s), total amount of pure speech (syllables/s), articulation rate (syllables/s), percentage of pauses (%), percentage of pauses within words (%), time between pauses (s), SPIR index of rhythmicity (words/min), fragmentation of vowels (%), voice onset time (s), stop-consonant spirantization (%). Aerodynamic voice parameters will be assessed with the DIANA system (http://www.sqlab.fr/) and algorithms specifically developed by GeoStat at Inria.
Day 1
Differences between groups in Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI)
AVQI will be calculated with the SESANE software (http://www.sqlab.fr/) and with algorithms developed by GeoStat at Inria. Objective measurement of overall voice quality consisted of determining the acoustic parameters for calculating AVQI: smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPs) with the computer program "SpeechTool" (James Hillenbrand, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) and harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), shimmer local, shimmer local dB, general slope of the spectrum (slope) and tilt of the regression line through the spectrum (tilt) with Praat. Te Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) was calculated according to the regression formula: 2.571 \[3.295 - 0.111 (CPPs) - 0.073 (HNR) - 0.213 (shimmer local) + 2.789 (shimmer local dB) - 0.032 (slope) + 0.077 (tilt)\].
Day 1
Differences between groups in oral airflow (dm3/s).
This parameter will be evaluated with the EVA2 system (http://www.sqlab.fr/).
Day 1
Differences between groups in glottal leakage (cc/s/dB)
This parameter will be evaluated with the EVA2 system (http://www.sqlab.fr/).
Day 1
Differences between groups in intra-oral pressure (hPa).
This parameter will be evaluated with the EVA2 system (http://www.sqlab.fr/).
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Differences between groups in perceptive analysis of dysphonia based on total GRBAS-I scale scores (range 0-18)
Day 1
Differences between groups in perceptive analysis of dysarthria based on French Clinical Dysarthria Battery scores
Day 1
Study Arms (3)
Parkinson's disease
OTHERDiagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) according to criteria
Multiple system atrophy
OTHERDiagnosis of Multiple Atrophy System (MSA) Parkinsonian form possible or probable according to Gilman et coll 's criteria (2008)
Healthy volunteer
OTHERAbsence of neurologic and oto-rhino-laryngologic disease
Interventions
A digital processing of voice recordings (from 30 to 45 minutes) will be performed for each participant, using a high quality digital recorder: the DIANA (computerized device of acoustic analysis) and the EVA-2 workstations (assisted Evaluation system Voice).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with Parkinson's disease :
- Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) according to criteria (Hughes et coll., 1992)
- Patient in early stage of PD : Hoehn\&Yahr stage between 1 and 2, and the onset of symptoms ≤ 4 years
- Patient with or without mild to moderate speech troubles: UPDRS III item 18 ≤ 2
- Patients with MSA-P (Parkinsonian form) :
- Diagnosis of Multiple Atrophy System (MSA) Parkinsonian form possible or probable according to Gilman et coll 's criteria (2008)
- Patient in early stage of MSA-P: score of part IV of the UMSARS (Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale) ≤ 3 points and the onset of symptoms ≤ 4 years
- Patient with or without mild to moderate speech troubles: UMSARS II item 2 ≤ 2
- Controls :
- Absence of neurologic and oto-rhino-laryngologic disease
You may not qualify if:
- The deaf and/or mutes
- Patient with speech troubles which are not related to the MSA or PD
- Person under safeguard justice, guardianship
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
Toulouse, 31000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wassilios MEISSNER, MD,PhD
University Hospital, Bordeaux
- STUDY CHAIR
Khalid DAOUDI, PhD
Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2017
First Posted
July 5, 2018
Study Start
June 26, 2018
Primary Completion
June 18, 2021
Study Completion
June 18, 2021
Last Updated
November 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11