NCT03577106

Brief Summary

Investigators will test a novel intervention through experimental therapeutic approach using fMRI-directed Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS), a high frequency TMS paradigm, for the treatment of severe, uncontrollable worry. While worry is a universal human experience, severe and excessive worry has been recently linked to increased risk of stroke and other cardiovascular diseases, increased risk of conversion to Alzheimer's disease as well as to higher risk of all-cause mortality in midlife and late-life. Severe, uncontrollable worry has been repeatedly associated with reduced quality of life and impaired functioning. Current treatment choices (antidepressant/anxiolytic medications and psychotherapeutic interventions) have been proven moderately efficacious in reducing anxiety/depression burden, but ineffective in reducing worry severity, a phenomenon that may contribute to the high relapse rates associated with mood and anxiety disorders. Our research indicated that worry severity is associated with hyperactivation in specific regions such as orbital frontal cortex, superior parietal gyrus, amygdala and parahippocampal gyrus. This pilot study will explore the efficacy of targeting one of these regions with iTBS. Based on investigators' previous results, the most accessible target is the right superior parietal gyrus (rSPG) - a region that remained significantly associated with severe worry after controlling for effects of comorbid depression or overall anxiety. As this region showed an increased in cerebrovascular flow in association with worry severity, investigators will use iTBS (5x/week for 2 weeks) to modulate cortical plasticity in this region and consequently, to reduce worry severity. TMS during wakefulness has been shown to alter subsequent sleep \[4\], Further, changes in sleep in response to TMS has been associated with how participants respond to the TMS as a treatment \[5\]. Thus, the study will measure sleep throughout the protocol to determine whether sleep changes as a function of TMS and whether sleep changes are associated with treatment response.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 31, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 5, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 6, 2018

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 4, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 4, 2022

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 22, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 22, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

May 31, 2018

Results QC Date

April 20, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 30, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

transcranial magnetic stimulationTMSMRImagnetic resonance imagingfMRIfunctional magnetic resonance imagingsleepintermittent theta burst stimulationiTBS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Worry Severity From Baseline to Post-intervention as Measured by the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)

    Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) scores range from 16 to 80 with higher levels indicating greater worry severity.

    Baseline and within 2 weeks post-TMS intervention

  • Participants Who Responded to TMS

    The breakdown of participants who responded to TMS treatment; responders had Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) scores that decreased by 30% or more from the baseline timepoint to the end of TMS treatment.

    Baseline and the end of TMS intervention (approximately two weeks)

Study Arms (1)

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Interventions

Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS), a form of TMS, will be targeted to the Inferior Parietal Cortex based on neural navigation software. TBS will be delivered for about 5-6 minutes, five days a week for two weeks, for a total of ten sessions.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must have completed Dr. Andreescu's study R01MH108509/PRO15080120.
  • Penn State Worry Questionnaire score of 55 or above.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any form of psychosis or Bipolar Disorder, dementia, a history of substance abuse within the last six months
  • Use of antidepressants within the last five to fourteen days (adequate washout interval to be determined by the principal investigator (PI) based on each specific antidepressant). For fluoxetine, the washout interval will be six weeks. However, for participants who are prescribed low dose psychotropics for pain, sleep disturbances, and/or medical conditions (e.g. amitriptyline for peripheral neuropathy, low dose trazodone as a sleep aid), these will be allowed in most circumstances. We will include participants on certain dosages of the most commonly prescribed antidepressants (for medical reasons) as follows: amitriptyline up to 50 mg/d, doxepin up to 50 mg/d, trazodone up to 100 mg/d, and imipramine up to 50 mg/d. We will review other cases individually and the PI will decide if the participants are eligible for the study and if they may continue the current medication.
  • Unable to complete MRI scans: presence of ferromagnetic metal in the body, claustrophobia
  • Contraindications for TMS:
  • Presence of a neurologic disorder or medical condition known to alter seizure threshold(e.g., stroke, aneurysm, brain surgery, structural brain lesion, brain injury, frequent/severe headaches)
  • Recurrent seizures or epilepsy in participant
  • Pregnancy
  • Metallic implants in body located at 30 cm or less from the position of the magnetic coil; presence in the body of other devices that may be affected by magnetic field (e.g. pacemakers).
  • Unable to temporarily discontinue benzodiazepines 48 hours prior to MRI scan. Participants on high doses of benzodiazepines (e.g., greater than or equivalent to 2 mg of lorazepam) will be excluded, given the complexity and potential complications of benzodiazepine taper/withdrawal.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Saeki T, Nakamura M, Hirai N, Noda Y, Hayasaka S, Iwanari H, Hirayasu Y. Localized potentiation of sleep slow-wave activity induced by prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with a major depressive episode. Brain Stimul. 2013 May;6(3):390-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Aug 31.

    PMID: 22964349BACKGROUND
  • Rosenquist PB, Krystal A, Heart KL, Demitrack MA, McCall WV. Left dorsolateral prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): sleep factor changes during treatment in patients with pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2013 Jan 30;205(1-2):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.011. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

    PMID: 23021320BACKGROUND
  • Golden J, Conroy RM, Bruce I, Denihan A, Greene E, Kirby M, Lawlor BA. The spectrum of worry in the community-dwelling elderly. Aging Ment Health. 2011 Nov;15(8):985-94. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.583621. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

    PMID: 21749221BACKGROUND
  • Tully PJ, Cosh SM, Baune BT. A review of the affects of worry and generalized anxiety disorder upon cardiovascular health and coronary heart disease. Psychol Health Med. 2013;18(6):627-44. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2012.749355. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

    PMID: 23324073BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Interventions

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anxiety DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Magnetic Field TherapyTherapeutics

Limitations and Caveats

Due to COVID, we were only able to recruit a total of 21 participants instead of 40 who were to complete full treatment. The treatment was only a typical 'half' dose consisting of 10 sessions of TMS rather than 20, which is typical. Three participants started TMS and decided to withdraw due to discomfort from TMS.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Scott Ward
Organization
UPMC

Study Officials

  • Carmen Andreescu, MD

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2018

First Posted

July 5, 2018

Study Start

December 6, 2018

Primary Completion

May 4, 2022

Study Completion

May 4, 2022

Last Updated

June 22, 2023

Results First Posted

June 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations