NCT03576781

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to parametically evaluate two different types of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) treatment strategies as a potential treatment for pain in individuals currently taking prescription opiates. Repetitive TMS is a non-invasive tool that uses magnetic pulses to temporarily stimulate specific brain areas. This study will test whether rTMS over different locations of the prefrontal cortex can produce a reduction in an individuals perception of pain and how the brain responds to pain. Participants will be randomized to receive either sham-rTMS, or one of two real rTMS treatments. Brain imaging, behavioral assessments, and pain assessments will be collected both immediately before and after rTMS.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for early_phase_1 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2017

Longer than P75 for early_phase_1 pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 9, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2018

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 3, 2018

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 12, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 12, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 6, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 3, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Brain StimulationTreatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • iTBS to the left DLPFC vs. cTBS to the left MPFC

    The effect of real vs. sham iTBS to the left DLPFC vs. real vs. sham cTBS to the left MPFC as a tool to modulate the brain response to pain will be assessed by comparing the brain activity in the executive circuit and limbic circuit before and after TMS.

    Day 1

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in pain threshold

    Day 1

  • Changes in opiate pain and craving inventory

    Day 1

Study Arms (4)

Real iTBS to the DLPFC

EXPERIMENTAL

One session of real intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) will be delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) (20 trains of stimulation over dlPFC (middle frontal gyrus) (F3); each train: 3 pulse bursts presented at 5Hz, 15 pulses/sec for 2 sec, 8 sec rest, 200 pulses/train; 110% RMT, MagPro; 600 pulses total)

Device: Real iTBS

Sham iTBS to the DLPFC

SHAM COMPARATOR

One session of sham intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) will be delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) (20 trains of stimulation over dlPFC (middle frontal gyrus) (F3); each train: 3 pulse bursts presented at 5Hz, 15 pulses/sec for 2 sec, 8 sec rest, 200 pulses/train; 110% RMT, MagPro; 600 pulses total)

Device: Sham iTBS

Real cTBS to the MPFC

EXPERIMENTAL

One session of real continuous Theta Burst Stimulation (cTBS) will be delivered to the left medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (1 train of stimulation over the left frontal pole (FP1); each train: 3 pulse bursts presented at 5Hz, 15 pulses/sec for 40 sec, 600 pulses/train, 110% RMT, MagPro; 600 pulses total)

Device: Real cTBS

Sham cTBS to the MPFC

SHAM COMPARATOR

One session of sham continuous Theta Burst Stimulation (cTBS) will be delivered to the left medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (1 train of stimulation over the left frontal pole (FP1); each train: 3 pulse bursts presented at 5Hz, 15 pulses/sec for 40 sec, 600 pulses/train, 110% RMT, MagPro; 600 pulses total)

Device: Sham cTBS

Interventions

Real iTBSDEVICE

This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses with the active sham coil (double blinded using the USB key)

Real iTBS to the DLPFC
Sham iTBSDEVICE

This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses with the active sham coil (double blinded using the USB key). The MagVenture MagPro system has an integrated active sham that passes current through two surface electrodes placed on the skin beneath the B60 coil.

Sham iTBS to the DLPFC
Real cTBSDEVICE

This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses with the active sham coil (double blinded using the USB key).

Real cTBS to the MPFC
Sham cTBSDEVICE

This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses with the active sham coil (double blinded using the USB key). The MagVenture MagPro system has an integrated active sham that passes current through two surface electrodes placed on the skin beneath the B60 coil.

Sham cTBS to the MPFC

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Able to read and understand questionnaires and informed consent.
  • Able to read and understand questionnaires and informed consent.
  • Lives within 50 miles of the study site.
  • Is not at elevated risk of seizure (i.e., does not have a history of seizures, is not currently prescribed medications known to lower seizure threshold)
  • Does not have metal objects in the head/neck.
  • Does not have a history of traumatic brain injury, including a head injury that resulted in hospitalization, loss of consciousness for more than 10 minutes, or having ever been informed that they have an epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
  • Does not have a history of claustrophobia leading to significant clinical anxiety symptoms.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any psychoactive illicit substance use (except marijuana and nicotine) within the last 30 days by self-report and urine drug screen. For marijuana, no use within the last seven days by verbal report and negative (or decreasing) urine THC levels.
  • Meets DSM IV criteria for current axis I disorders of major depression, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post traumatic stress syndrome, bipolar affective disorder, schizophrenia, dissociate disorders, eating disorders, and any other psychotic disorder or organic mental disorder.
  • Has current suicidal ideation or homicidal ideation.
  • Has the need for maintenance or acute treatment with any psychoactive medication including anti-seizure medications and medications for ADHD.
  • Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant (by urine HCG), nursing, or who are not using a reliable form of birth control.
  • Has current charges pending for a violent crime (not including DUI related offenses).
  • Does not have a stable living situation.
  • Suffers from chronic migraines.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States

Location

Ralph H Johnson Veterans Medical Center

Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainChronic PainOpioid-Related Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNarcotic-Related DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Colleen A Hanlon, PhD

    Medical University of South Carolina

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2018

First Posted

July 3, 2018

Study Start

February 9, 2017

Primary Completion

November 12, 2019

Study Completion

November 12, 2019

Last Updated

January 6, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No individual participant data will be shared. All data is deidentified.

Locations