Consciousness Transcranial Alternative Electric STimulation
CONTEST_1
Effects of the Transcranial Alternative Electric Stimulation on the Consciousness Access in Healthy Subjects
2 other identifiers
interventional
67
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) at theta frequency and the the effect of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on the conscious access to visual stimuli. tACS and tDCS are non-invasive stimulation techniques that are used to induce brain oscillations at certain frequency or to increase the brain activity in applied region. Healthy participants will perform a behavioral task measuring conscious access (visual backward metacontrast masking task) before, during and after fronto-parietal tACS or tDCS stimulation which will increase neural activity in the two sites. This will allow us to examine online and remaining effects of the stimulation and the causal role of fronto-parietal activity on conscious access.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy
Started Apr 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 16, 2021
CompletedMay 16, 2025
March 1, 2025
3.2 years
April 19, 2018
May 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in subjective performance on the behavioral task (% of seen masked target) between before and after stimulation.
Change in the percentage of the correct responses on the subjective evaluation, that is the percentage of seen masked target at each SOA over all masked target presented, between before and after stimulation, for each stimulation modality (inphase theta, antiphase theta, sham).
Measured at each stimulation sessions (three sessions in a randomized cross-over order) for each participant. The three sessions will span in an average of two weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in visual evoked potentials between before and after stimulation.
Measured at each stimulation sessions (three sessions in a randomized cross-over order) for each participant. The three sessions will span in an average of two weeks.
Change in quantitative EEG measures between before and after stimulation.
Measured at each stimulation sessions (three sessions in a randomized cross-over order) for each participant. The three sessions will span in an average of two weeks.
Change in objective performance on the behavioral task (% of correct response on the number comparison task for masked target) between before and after stimulation.
Measured at each stimulation sessions (three sessions in a randomized cross-over order) for each participant. The three sessions will span in an average of two weeks.
Study Arms (5)
In-phase tACS
EXPERIMENTAL6 Hz stimulation (1000 μA) will be applied simultaneously over the left prefrontal dorso-lateral cortex (F3 of the 10-20 international scalp EEG system) and the left parietal cortex (P3) for 20 minutes using an 8-channels stimulator. The phase difference between the two stimulation sites will be 0°.
Anti-phase tACS
ACTIVE COMPARATOR6 Hz stimulation (1000 μA) will be applied simultaneously over the left prefrontal dorso-lateral cortex (F3 of the 10-20 international scalp EEG system) and the left parietal cortex (P3) for 20 minutes using an 8-channels stimulator. The phase difference will be 180°,
Sham tACS
SHAM COMPARATORThe stimulation (anti-phase) will start with a current intensity of 1000 μA lasting for 30 seconds. Afterwards, the intensity will progressively decrease over 20 seconds until cessation.
Active tDCS
EXPERIMENTAL1000 μA tDCS stimulation will be applied simultaneously over the left prefrontal dorso-lateral cortex (F3 of the 10-20 international scalp EEG system) and the left parietal cortex (P3) for 20 minutes using an 8-channels stimulator
Sham tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORThe stimulation will start with a current intensity of 1000 μA lasting for 30 seconds. Afterwards, the intensity will progressively decrease over 20 seconds until cessation.
Interventions
tACS is a non-invasive stimulation technique that works by delivering a weak sinusoidally oscillating electrical current to the surface of the skull to entrain oscillations in the brain.
tDCS is a form of neuromodulation method where very low levels of constant current are delivered to specifically targeted areas of the brain
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- French social security affiliation
- Absence of neurological and psychiatric disorders
- Absence of antiepileptic treatment
- Normal vision (with or without correction)
- Age between 18 and 60 years
- Right-handedness
- Signed informed consent to participate
You may not qualify if:
- Person under legal protection (legal guardian, tutor, curator)
- Past medical history of epilepsy
- Past medical history of neurological or psychiatric disorders
- Electrical stimulation contraindication (metallic intra-cranial implants, pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, cranial prosthesis)
- Antiepileptic and other psychotropes treatment
- Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women
- Left-handedness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle - CR-ICM U 975 / UMRS INSERM 1127
Paris, 75013, France
Related Publications (2)
Del Cul A, Baillet S, Dehaene S. Brain dynamics underlying the nonlinear threshold for access to consciousness. PLoS Biol. 2007 Oct;5(10):e260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050260.
PMID: 17896866BACKGROUNDPolania R, Nitsche MA, Korman C, Batsikadze G, Paulus W. The importance of timing in segregated theta phase-coupling for cognitive performance. Curr Biol. 2012 Jul 24;22(14):1314-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
PMID: 22683259BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lionel NACCACHE, MD, PhD
CR-ICM U 975 /UMRS INSERM 1127
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacobo D SITT, MD, PhD
CR-ICM U 975 /UMRS INSERM 1127
- STUDY CHAIR
Bertrand HERMANN, MD
CR-ICM U 975 /UMRS INSERM 1127
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Study will be double-blind : neither participant nor the investigator will know which stimulation type (in-phase active, anti-phase active or sham) is on.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2018
First Posted
July 2, 2018
Study Start
April 23, 2018
Primary Completion
July 16, 2021
Study Completion
July 16, 2021
Last Updated
May 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share