Can Sciatica Patients Avoid Surgery?
CASPAS
Can Sciatica Patients Due to Intervertebral Disc Herniation Avoid Surgery by Treatment Using the McKenzie Method or by Advice to Stay Active?
1 other identifier
interventional
162
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sciatica pain is associated with a disc disorder in 85% of cases. Sciatica is shown to resolve without treatments in the majority of cases. Spontaneous regression of the intervertebral disc herniation occurs where the herniation loses its volume partly or totally without surgical interventions. It has estimated that only 5 to 20% of patients with symptomatic intervertebral disc herniation require surgery. Most trials comparing surgical trials and conservative treatments of sciatica due to intervertebral disc herniation favor surgery, because it results in earlier relief of pain. However, one year after surgery, there were only a few differences in pain and disability between surgery and conservative treatment groups. It has shown that the number of surgeries (discectomies) decreased among patients with sciatica when treated by using a mechanical diagnosis and therapy approach (MDT) also called the McKenzie method. In addition, by using the MDT method it has also been shown that sciatica patient who were clinically classified as "centralizers" had good to excellent non-surgical outcomes and many of them avoided surgery, whereas non-centralizing pain has shown to predict worse treatment outcomes, chronic low back disorder and disability. Further, patients who do not have centralization will be 6 times more likely to undergo surgery.The primary aim of this multicenter randomized clinical trial is to find out how many patients with sciatica due to intervertebral disc herniation with radicular symptoms for at least 6 weeks, and who are on the waiting list for surgery, avoid surgery by treatment using the McKenzie method compared to advice to stay active. Secondary aims are to compare the patients' self-reported outcomes such as low back and leg pain intensity, disability, work ability, sick-leave days, fear avoidance beliefs, kinesiophobia, depression and quality of life. The outcomes are measured at baseline, two and three months in the non-surgical patients. In addition, in the patients who have surgery the outcomes are measured at baseline and the day before and one month after surgery. Follow-up measurements are at 12 and 24 months
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 31, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedSeptember 2, 2021
September 1, 2021
2 years
June 19, 2018
September 1, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients who avoided surgery
Number of patients who avoided surgery treated by using the McKenzie- method or by advice to stay active
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain Intensity
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups
Disability
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups.
Health-Related Quality of Life
Changes are reported from baseline to longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups
Other Outcomes (5)
Fear Avoidance
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups
Kinesiophobia
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups.
Depression
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups.
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
McKenzie - method group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be sent to an experienced MDT therapist for therapy. They are 1) assessed clinically, 2) treated according the MDT-approach which includes home exercise program, consisting i) an educational component, and ii) an active therapy component with directional preference exercises, several times a day with sustained end range positions according to symptom response, and with avoiding aggravating positions. Participants have a maximum of 7 treatment visits. They will also have physiotherapy counselling at study entry about the good prognosis of sciatica.
Advice to stay active group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants enrolled into this group will receive physiotherapist's counselling at study entry for at least 60 minutes time about the good prognosis of sciatica, the spontaneous regression of the intervertebral disc herniation and pain tolerance ("natural healing"). In addition, they will get ergonomic advice and advice to stay normally active. The participants are also told to avoid bed rest and advised to continue their normal routines as actively as possible including exercise activities with limits permitted by their signs and symptoms. A two-page summary booklet related to these items will be given to them.
Interventions
Treatment according to the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy Approach
Physiotherapy councelling advicing to stay normally active
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy, previous surgery or treated by using MDT- method, fibromyalgia, signs of serious diseases or "red-flags" symptoms. Symptoms indicating the Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) or lower limb palsy that hinders normal functioning, previous injury from a car accident or a high fall, or osteoporotic fractures for the elderly, cancer anamnesis, tumor, or inflammation, general symptoms such as fever, chills, or losing weight for an unknown reason, back problems complicated by other serious diseases such as polyneuropathy, neurological diseases, circulatory brain diseases, central spinal stenosis, myelopathy, syringomyelia, and long-term neuropathic pain not related to sciatica, unwillingness to undergo surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Central Finland Hospital Districtlead
- Seinajoki Central Hospitalcollaborator
- Kuopio University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Central Finland Central Hospital,
Jyväskylä, Central Finland, 40620, Finland
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jari Ylinen, MD,PhD.
Central Finland HD
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PT, PhD, researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2018
First Posted
June 28, 2018
Study Start
December 31, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
September 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share