Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) Basal Insulin Users: The Mobile Study (MOBILE)
MOBILE
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) Basal Insulin Users: The Mobile Study (MOBILE)
1 other identifier
interventional
176
1 country
15
Brief Summary
A study to compare the glycemic and quality of life benefits of diabetes management using Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) or self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) made by study participants and their primary care physicians. Decisions will be based on insights from real-time use and retrospective insights, determined during remote visits. Participants will have type 2 diabetes and be using basal insulin (with or without oral medications and/or Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue) and have an elevated Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Jul 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 4, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 4, 2021
CompletedApril 21, 2021
April 1, 2021
2.4 years
June 1, 2018
April 19, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Phase 1: Change in HbA1c
Phase 1: Between group differences (CGM and SMBG) for the change in HbA1c (from Central Lab) from baseline to Month 8
Baseline to Month 8
Phase 2: Change in CGM time in target range
Between group differences for the Phase 1 CGM Group re-randomized to Discontinue CGM (use SMBG only) or to Continue CGM for the change in time in target range (70-180 mg/dL) from Month 8 to Month 14
Month 8 to Month 14
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Phase 1: Change in CGM time in target range
Baseline to Month 8
Phase 1: Change in CGM time-hyperglycemic
Baseline to Month 8
Phase 1: Change in mean glucose from CGM
Baseline to Month 8
Phase 1: Percent decreasing HbA1c by ≥0.5%
Baseline to Month 8
Phase 1: Proportion increasing CGM time in target range by ≥10% and ≥15%
Baseline to Month 8
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (37)
Phase 1 and Phase 2: Percent with glycated hemoglobin <7.0%
Baseline to Month 8, Month 8 to Month 14 & Baseline to Month 14
Phase 1 and Phase 2:Percent with glycated hemoglobin <7.5%
Baseline to Month 8, Month 8 to Month 14 & Baseline to Month 14
Percent decreasing glycated hemoglobin by ≥1.0% (absolute)
Baseline to Month 8, Baseline to Month 14
- +34 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Continous Glucose Monitor
EXPERIMENTALSelf Monitoring Blood Glucose
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 30 or older
- Diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes
- HbA1c between 7.8-11.5%
- Use of basal insulin, with or without concomitant use of oral agents or GLP-1 agonist
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Renal disease
- Conditions that impact the stability of a HbA1c measurement
- Use of prandial insulin
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- DexCom, Inc.lead
- Jaeb Center for Health Researchcollaborator
Study Sites (15)
Keck School of Medicine @ USC
Los Angeles, California, 90022, United States
Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute
San Diego, California, 92121, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303, United States
Northwestern Memorial
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Iowa Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265, United States
University of Michigan Internal Medicine
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, United States
Henry Ford Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
Park Nicollet International Diabetes Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416, United States
Washington University Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63130, United States
Las Vegas Endocrinology
Henderson, Nevada, 89052, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517, United States
Carteret Medical Group
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557, United States
Lucas Research / Diabetes & Endocrinology Consultants, PC
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557, United States
Vanderbilt Eskind Diabetes Clinic
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
Amarillo Medical Specialists, LLP
Amarillo, Texas, 79106, United States
Related Publications (5)
Martens TW, Beck RW, Griffen C, Di J, Elkind-Hirsch K, Johnson ML, Castle JR, Beck SE, Bergenstal RM. Rapid improvements in glycemic management with use of continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: 3-month analysis of the MOBILE study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2025 Nov 4;13(6):e005469. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005469.
PMID: 41192933DERIVEDDavis G, Bailey R, Calhoun P, Price D, Beck RW. Magnitude of Glycemic Improvement in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal Insulin: Subgroup Analyses from the MOBILE Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 May;24(5):324-331. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0489. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
PMID: 34962151DERIVEDBailey R, Calhoun P, Chao C, Walker TC. With or Without Residual C-Peptide, Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Realize Glycemic Benefits from Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Apr;24(4):281-284. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0384. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
PMID: 34704817DERIVEDAleppo G, Beck RW, Bailey R, Ruedy KJ, Calhoun P, Peters AL, Pop-Busui R, Philis-Tsimikas A, Bao S, Umpierrez G, Davis G, Kruger D, Bhargava A, Young L, Buse JB, McGill JB, Martens T, Nguyen QT, Orozco I, Biggs W, Lucas KJ, Polonsky WH, Price D, Bergenstal RM; MOBILE Study Group; Type 2 Diabetes Basal Insulin Users: The Mobile Study (MOBILE) Study Group:. The Effect of Discontinuing Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin. Diabetes Care. 2021 Dec;44(12):2729-2737. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1304. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
PMID: 34588210DERIVEDMartens T, Beck RW, Bailey R, Ruedy KJ, Calhoun P, Peters AL, Pop-Busui R, Philis-Tsimikas A, Bao S, Umpierrez G, Davis G, Kruger D, Bhargava A, Young L, McGill JB, Aleppo G, Nguyen QT, Orozco I, Biggs W, Lucas KJ, Polonsky WH, Buse JB, Price D, Bergenstal RM; MOBILE Study Group. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Jun 8;325(22):2262-2272. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7444.
PMID: 34077499DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
David Price, MD
DexCom, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2018
First Posted
June 25, 2018
Study Start
July 30, 2018
Primary Completion
January 4, 2021
Study Completion
January 4, 2021
Last Updated
April 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share