To Compare Two Commonly Used Soft Tissue Grafting Techniques to Achieve Coronal Flap Advancement and Root Coverage
VISTA
A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Vestibular Incision Supraperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) and Sulcular Tunnel Access Procedures With Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) and Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM).
2 other identifiers
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare two incision designs to allow for coronal gingival/mucosal flap advancement and tissue augmentation with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) graft around teeth with gingival recession and a lack of adequate keratinized gingiva. To the investigators knowledge, these two techniques have not been compared for differences in clinical (amount of root coverage, tissue thickness, and esthetics) and patient-centered outcomes (pain, swelling, change in daily activities) in a controlled study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 18, 2024
CompletedNovember 18, 2024
September 1, 2024
9 months
May 14, 2018
September 27, 2023
September 16, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
KT Width at 6 Month Following Grafting With VISTA and Sulcular Tunnel Access With ADM
Compare the increase in keratinized tissue (KT) between two incision designs for root coverage and tissue augmentation.
From baseline to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Tissue Thickness at Gingival Margin of the Grafted Sites at 6 Months With ADM
From baseline to 6 months
Change in Tissue Thickness 5mm Apical to Gingival Margin of the Grafted Sites at 6 Months With ADM
From baseline to 6 months
Assessed Esthetic Outcomes Using a Standardized Pink Esthetic Scale (PES) at 6 Months Postoperatively
6 months
Study Arms (2)
VISTA
EXPERIMENTALVISTA incision with CAF and ADM
Sulcular Tunnell access
ACTIVE COMPARATORSulcular tunnel surgery with CAF and ADM
Interventions
Vestibular incision supraperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) incision will be performed on all individuals in this arm of the study to facilitate coronal advancement of the gingival flap and placement of acellular dermal matrix
Sulcular tunnel access incision will be performed on all individuals in this arm of the study to facilitate coronal advancement of the gingival flap and placement of acellular dermal matrix
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English speaking
- At least 18 years old
- Must be a patient of the UAB Dental School
- Able to read and understand informed consent document
- One or more adjacent teeth (up to four) with Miller class I or II gingival recession defects and less than or equal to 2mm of KT at each site to be treated.
- Presence of periodontally healthy, non-carious neighboring teeth, healthy implants or edentulous ridges on either side of the involved site(s)
- No anticipated need for restorative care at the teeth to be treated during the study period.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-English speaking
- Less than 18 years old
- Smokers/tobacco users (\>10 cigarettes/day)
- Patients with systemic pathologies or conditions contraindicating oral surgical procedures or adversely affecting wound healing
- Presence of active periodontal disease or radiographic interproximal bone loss or tooth malposition, which would yield a Miller class III or IV categorization for the recession defect.
- Presence of frenulae or other soft tissue anomalies at the site(s) to be treated that, in the opinion of the investigators, will interfere with successful access and treatment of the soft tissue defects.
- Previous soft tissue grafting at the site(s) to be treated
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-0007, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Randomization was performed by site (teeth) due to challenges recruiting sufficient participants for both arms.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Maria Geisinger, PI, Professor, Director of Advanced Education in Periodontology
- Organization
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria L Geisinger, DDS, MS
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2018
First Posted
June 21, 2018
Study Start
April 23, 2019
Primary Completion
January 29, 2020
Study Completion
August 30, 2022
Last Updated
November 18, 2024
Results First Posted
November 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data from this study will not be shared with other researchers outside of our research laboratory group.