SpO2 Accuracy Comparison of Medline ReNewal Sensors to Arterial Blood CO-Oximetry
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the Medline ReNewal pulse oximetry sensors during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry. The end goal is to provide supporting documentation for the SpO2 accuracy validation of the ReNewal sensors. It is required that the Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) performance of the ReNewal pulse oximetry sensors will meet a specification of 3 or better in non-motion conditions for the range of 70 - 100% SaO2 thereby demonstrating an acceptable SpO2 accuracy performance specification.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 10, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 10, 2019
CompletedJune 18, 2019
June 1, 2019
1 day
May 9, 2018
February 8, 2019
June 7, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
SpO2 Percentage Specification
Percentage of SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) measured by the Reprocessed Oximeter pulse oximetry sensors during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry. The Accuracy root mean square (ARMS) between measured SpO2 and reference SaO2 (arterial oxygen saturation) must meett the 3% specification for each Medline Renewal Reprocessed pulse oximetry sensor style.
2 hours
Study Arms (2)
Masimo SpO2 Adhesive Sensors, Adtx (1859) & (2329)
EXPERIMENTALReference sensors from the reprocessed oximeter device will be placed on each subject to evaluate the SpO2 accuracy and performance.
Covidien Nellcor SpO2 Sensor, MAX-A and MAX-N
SHAM COMPARATORA whole blood analyzer (CO-Oximeter) is used as the reference standard device for obtaining the functional SaO2 value from arterial blood samples obtained during the study.
Interventions
An oximeter is a device used to transmit radiation at a known wavelength(s) through blood and to measure the blood oxygen saturation based on the amount of reflected or scattered radiation. Pulse oximetry monitoring is considered a standard physiological measurement and is used by clinicians in everyday situations to estimate arterial oxygen saturation. Because an arterial sample of blood is not required to make the measurement, the pulse oximeter can provide non-invasive real time information.
A whole blood analyzer (CO-Oximeter) is used as the reference standard device for obtaining the functional SaO2 value from arterial blood samples obtained during the study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults with a minimum of 3 males and a minimum of 3 females, with the balance made up of either
- Subject must have the ability to understand and provide written informed consent
- Subject is 18 to 50 years of age
- Subject must be willing and able to comply with study procedures and duration
- Subject is a non-smoker or who has not smoked within 2 days prior to the study
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is considered as being morbidly obese (defined as BMI \>39.5)
- Compromised circulation, injury, or physical malformation of fingers, toes, hands, ears or forehead/skull or other sensor sites which would limit the ability to test sites needed for the study. (Note: Certain malformations may still allow subjects to participate if the condition is noted and would not affect the particular sites utilized.)
- Females who are pregnant, who are trying to get pregnant, or have a urine test positive for pregnancy on the day of the study
- Smoker Subjects who have refrained will be screened for COHb levels \>3% as assessed with a Masimo Radical 7 (Rainbow)
- Subjects with known respiratory conditions such as: (self-reported)
- uncontrolled / severe asthma,
- flu,
- pneumonia / bronchitis,
- shortness of breath / respiratory distress,
- respiratory or lung surgery,
- emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung disease
- Subjects with known heart or cardiovascular conditions such as: (self-reported, except for blood pressure and ECG review)
- hypertension: systolic \>140mmHg, Diastolic \>90mmHg on 3 consecutive readings (reviewed during health screen).
- have had cardiovascular surgery
- Chest pain (angina)
- +31 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medline Industrieslead
- Clinimark, LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Clinimark Desaturation Laboratory, Site ID# 001
Louisville, Colorado, 80027, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kara Cassady
- Organization
- Medline Industries, Inc
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arthur Cabrera, MD
Avista Adventist Hospital, Staff Anesthesiologist
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2018
First Posted
June 21, 2018
Study Start
May 9, 2018
Primary Completion
May 10, 2018
Study Completion
May 10, 2018
Last Updated
June 18, 2019
Results First Posted
June 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06