Evaluation of Immunobiogram® as a Tool in Adjustment of Immunosuppressant Therapy for Renal Transplant
TRANSBIO
Evaluation of the Clinical Consistency and Analytical Robustness of Immunobiogram® as an In Vitro Diagnostics Biotechnological Tool to Help Decision-making in Adjustment of Immunosuppressant Therapy for Renal Transplant
1 other identifier
observational
164
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The trial is an observational, multi-center study to determine if a new blood test (Immunobiogram®) done after renal transplant can help predict how well the immune system is working and responding to a new kidney. These blood tests could, in the future, potentially guide how doctors manage patient's anti-rejection medication.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 28, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2019
CompletedDecember 29, 2023
December 1, 2023
11 months
May 28, 2018
December 26, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the robustness of Immunobiogram® (IMBG) as an in vitro Diagnostic Bioassay to study the sensitivity/resistance patterns of Immunosuppressant drugs in Renal Transplantation
Robustness of Immunobiogram® (IMBG) as an In Vitro Diagnostic Bioassay to study the sensitivity/resistance patterns of Immunosuppressant drugs in Renal Transplantation, evaluated as follows: * Immunobiogram® offers personal sensitivity/resistance patterns of Immunosuppressive Medications (IM), with a range of responses for each IM drug considering all patients included * Immunobiogram® shows intrasubject consistency in terms of similarity with a maximum +/- 20% of variation in the inhibitory dose/distance 50 (ID50), in the three IMBG performed on inclusion; and additionally, similar consistency must be observed in the last three IMBG performed one month after inclusion
Baseline and 30 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Evaluate intrasubject and inter-time consistency of Immunobiogram®
Baseline and 30 days
Evaluate the correlation of Immunobiogram® sensitivity/resistance patterns with clinical evolution
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
ARM 1-Bad vs Good Clinical Evolution
This arm is intended to evaluate the correlation of Immunobiogram® sensitivity/resistance patterns with clinical prognosis as it may be judged at this moment considering clinical outcomes and immune-biomarker evolution in the past 12 to 18 months. Thus, it may confirm the BH-Pilot study findings. Renal transplant patients of two types will be included: * Patients who, over previous months, have had a bad clinical evolution, in which rejection mechanisms were involved * Patients with a good and stable clinical evolution IMBG sensitivity/resistance profiles will be compared amongst the two groups to evaluate the differences.
ARM 2-Stable Renal Transplant Patients
This arm is intended to evaluate robustness of Immunobiogram® as an IVD test. Thus, it will be performed intrasubject comparisons and inter-time evaluation of two sets of Immunobiogram® separated by 30+/- 10 days, each including three IMBG determinations (IMBGx3 - IMBGx3, the two sets separated by 30+/- 10 days). The intended evaluation will be to analyse the similarities between all IMBG tests performed, both between the same set and also between the two sets planned.
Interventions
NA-Observational only
Eligibility Criteria
Male and female subjects \<25 to \< 70 years in age who have had a renal transplant performed at least one year before inclusion in the study
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 25 years and \< 70 years.
- Male and Female.
- ARM 1:
- Bad clinical evolution: patients with renal dysfunction and positive biopsy to rejection OR significant increase in strength of DSA expressed as Luminex MFI. Specifically, the following two criteria must comply:
- Renal function progressive deterioration, with significant creatinine increase of at least 15% for 18 months and/or proteinuria over \> 500 mg/day or ratio protein/creatinine\> 500 mg/g DE NOVO or increase in 50%.
- Biopsy in the last 12 months that shows positive signs attributable to any kind of immunological response compatible with any type of rejection AND/OR at least 50% increase in strength of DSA expressed as Luminex MFI in comparison with previous determination and always at titers more than 3000UI.
- Good clinical evolution: patients without rejection episodes, negative DSA, stable renal function and no changes in treatment in the past 12 months. ALL the following criteria must apply
- Stable renal function in the past 12 months
- NO DSA titers
- No history of previous rejection episodes
- Stable immunosuppressive medication (No change in prednisone or MPA dose and tacrolimus dose with changes \<20% of the dose) in the past 12 months
- ARM 2:
- Stable renal function
- No DSA titers
- No history of previous rejection episodes
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Rejection of informed consent
- Active systemic infections that needed antimicrobial treatment in the past two months
- Active immune-based diseases with acute outbreaks in the past 12 months, despite immunosuppressive treatment
- Severe ischemia-reperfusion injury of current renal transplant with delayed graft function objectively evident at more than 20 days after transplant AND/OR kidney transplanted from a deceased, very elderly donor (\>80 years)
- Double transplant (renal + another organ)
- HIV, HBV, HCV infection or other severe infectious diseases that prevent blood samples from being processed in a conventional laboratory
- Chronic Allograft Injury (CAI) unlikely related to immune processes, by the Investigator´s judgement
- Recurrent primary kidney disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julio Pascual, MD, PhD
Parc du Salut Mar
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2018
First Posted
June 20, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 30, 2019
Study Completion
May 31, 2019
Last Updated
December 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share