A Prospective Comparative Study of Outcomes With Proton and Photon Radiation in Prostate Cancer
COMPPARE
4 other identifiers
interventional
3,000
1 country
53
Brief Summary
This study is a large, prospective, pragmatic, controlled comparison of patient-centric outcomes \[quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and disease control\] between parallel cohorts of men with prostate cancer treated simultaneously at proton therapy facilities and at geographically similar conventional (photon-based) radiation facilities using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Jul 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
53 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
ExpectedMarch 9, 2026
August 1, 2025
7.6 years
May 15, 2018
March 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bowel urgency and bowel frequency Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) item scores
EPIC assesses the disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies and comprises four summary domains (Urinary, Bowel, Sexual and Hormonal). Factor analysis supports dividing the Urinary Domain Summary Score into two distinct Incontinence and Irritative/Obstructive subscales. In addition, each Domain Summary Score has measurable Function Subscale and Bother Subscale components. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are components. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better HRQOL
2-years after the end of radiation therapy
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Grade 2 or higher toxicity for each adverse event assessed by CTCAE
2-years after the end of radiation therapy
Grade 2 or higher toxicity for each adverse event assessed by PRO-CTCAE.
2-years after the end of radiation therapy
Freedom from biochemical progression using PSA results.
3-years after the end of radiation therapy
Study Arms (4)
IMRT (Photon)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAs this trial is pragmatic, all treatment will be standard of care.
Proton Therapy Standard of Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORAs this trial is pragmatic, all treatment will be standard of care.
Standard Proton Therapy
EXPERIMENTAL78.0 Gy (RBE) in 39 fractions. This is Arm 1 of the embedded randomized trial.
Hypofractionated Proton therapy
EXPERIMENTAL60.0 Gy (RBE) in 20 fractions This is Arm 2 of the embedded randomized trial.
Interventions
As this trial is pragmatic, all treatment will be standard of care.
As this trial is pragmatic, all treatment will be standard of care.
60.0 Gy (RBE) in 20 fractions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
- years of age at the time of consent with a life expectancy estimation (LEE) of ≥ 8 years.
- Localized prostate cancer, as confirmed by staging with PSA, biopsy, Gleason score, DRE with or without mpMRI, and clinical stage.
- Very low-risk, low-risk, intermediate-risk, or high-risk disease based on NCCN Prostate Cancer Risk Group Guidelines and Joint AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guidelines.
- If patient has high-risk disease, nuclear medicine bone imaging must be performed to document the absence of overt metastatic disease in bones.
- ECOG/Zubrod Performance Status 0 - 2.
- Candidate for definitive prostate radiotherapy (either IMRT or proton).
- If patient is to be treated with IMRT, all treatment must be planned with IMRT; if patient is to be treated with protons, all treatment must be planned with protons (including pelvic nodes if treated).
You may not qualify if:
- Findings of metastatic disease (nodal or distant, N1 or M1).
- Very high-risk prostate cancer based on NCCN Prostate Cancer Risk Group Guidelines and Joint AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guidelines.
- Prior procedures for treatment of prostate cancer, such as radical or robotic prostatectomy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, cryosurgery, or focal prostatectomy \[note that procedures used for benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms, such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and GreenLight Laser Therapy, are acceptable\].
- Previous prostate cancer treatment with the exception of ADT according to NCCN guidelines.
- History of invasive rectal malignancy or other malignancy in the true pelvis (e.g. bladder, rectum, or reproductive organs), regardless of disease-free interval.
- Active inflammatory bowel disease (i.e., patients requiring medical interventions or who are symptomatic).
- Prior pelvic RT for any reason.
- Documented lack of psychological ability or general health permitting completion of the study requirements and required follow-up.
- Documented diminished capacity to understand the risks and benefits of participation in research and to autonomously provide informed consent.
- In addition, because the embedded randomized controlled trial compares fractionation schemes, patients who are receiving pelvic node irradiation may not be enrolled on the randomized controlled trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (53)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92093, United States
Proton Therapy Treatment Center - Loma Linda University
Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States
Sutter Health
Roseville, California, 95661, United States
California Protons Cancer Therapy Center
San Diego, California, 92121, United States
Department of Radiation Oncology Davis Cancer Pavilion
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute
Jacksonville, Florida, 32206, United States
Ackerman Cancer Center
Jacksonville, Florida, 32223, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
University of Miami School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Miami Cancer Institute
Miami, Florida, 33176, United States
Orlando Health UF Health Center
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Winship Cancer Institute - Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Northwestern Medicine Proton Center
Warrenville, Illinois, 60555, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Lawrence, Kansas, 66045, United States
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40292, United States
Willis-Knighton Medical Center PTC
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, United States
University of Maryland
College Park, Maryland, 20742, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System
Mankato, Minnesota, 56001, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
S Lee Kling Proton Therapy Center - Washington University Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States
Covenant Health
Somerset, New Jersey, 08873, United States
New York Proton Center
New York, New York, 10035, United States
Weill Cornell
New York, New York, 10065, United States
The Duke University Health System
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
UNC- Rex Hospital
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, United States
University of Cincinnati Medical PTC
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
University Hospitals- Seidman Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Stephenson Cancer Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97201, United States
University of Pennsylvania--Penn Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19144, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29407, United States
Covenant Health Proton Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909, United States
Texas Oncology
Austin, Texas, 78731, United States
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Texas Center for Proton Therapy
Irving, Texas, 75063, United States
Texas Oncology - Longview
Longview, Texas, 75601, United States
Texas Oncology - McKinney
McKinney, Texas, 75071, United States
Texas Oncology - Plano West
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
Texas Oncology - Waco
Waco, Texas, 76712, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22904, United States
Inova Schar Cancer Institute
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031, United States
Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute
Hampton, Virginia, 23666, United States
Seattle Care Alliance/University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98133, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, 54703, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare
Sparta, Wisconsin, 54656, United States
Related Publications (26)
NCCN Clinical Practical Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer. Version 2. 2018.
BACKGROUNDAJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
BACKGROUNDSiegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
PMID: 28055103BACKGROUNDU.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Draft Recommendation Statement: Prostate Cancer: Screening. April 2017; https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementDraft/prostate-cancer-screening1. Accessed May 8, 2017.
BACKGROUNDChen RC, Clark JA, Talcott JA. Individualizing quality-of-life outcomes reporting: how localized prostate cancer treatments affect patients with different levels of baseline urinary, bowel, and sexual function. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 20;27(24):3916-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.6486. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
PMID: 19620493BACKGROUNDSanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, Lin X, Greenfield TK, Litwin MS, Saigal CS, Mahadevan A, Klein E, Kibel A, Pisters LL, Kuban D, Kaplan I, Wood D, Ciezki J, Shah N, Wei JT. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074311.
PMID: 18354103BACKGROUNDStokes ME, Ishak J, Proskorovsky I, Black LK, Huang Y. Lifetime economic burden of prostate cancer. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 28;11:349. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-349.
PMID: 22204308BACKGROUNDRiley GF, Potosky AL, Lubitz JD, Kessler LG. Medicare payments from diagnosis to death for elderly cancer patients by stage at diagnosis. Med Care. 1995 Aug;33(8):828-41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199508000-00007.
PMID: 7637404BACKGROUNDJemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
PMID: 21296855BACKGROUNDGray PJ, Lin CC, Cooperberg MR, Jemal A, Efstathiou JA. Temporal Trends and the Impact of Race, Insurance, and Socioeconomic Status in the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):729-737. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.047. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
PMID: 27597241BACKGROUNDMiller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, Stein KD, Alteri R, Jemal A. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):271-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
PMID: 27253694BACKGROUNDChamie K, Williams SB, Hu JC. Population-Based Assessment of Determining Treatments for Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):60-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.192.
PMID: 26182305BACKGROUNDHamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Neal DE; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
PMID: 27626136BACKGROUNDZietman A. Proton beam and prostate cancer: An evolving debate. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2013 Jul 3;18(6):338-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2013.06.001.
PMID: 24416575BACKGROUNDWisenbaugh ES, Andrews PE, Ferrigni RG, Schild SE, Keole SR, Wong WW, Vora SA. Proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer 101: basics, controversies, and facts. Rev Urol. 2014;16(2):67-75.
PMID: 25009446BACKGROUNDVargas C, Fryer A, Mahajan C, Indelicato D, Horne D, Chellini A, McKenzie C, Lawlor P, Henderson R, Li Z, Lin L, Olivier K, Keole S. Dose-volume comparison of proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 1;70(3):744-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2335. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
PMID: 17904306BACKGROUNDTrofimov A, Nguyen PL, Coen JJ, Doppke KP, Schneider RJ, Adams JA, Bortfeld TR, Zietman AL, Delaney TF, Shipley WU. Radiotherapy treatment of early-stage prostate cancer with IMRT and protons: a treatment planning comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Oct 1;69(2):444-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.018. Epub 2007 May 21.
PMID: 17513063BACKGROUNDFriedland W, Schmitt E, Kundrat P, Dingfelder M, Baiocco G, Barbieri S, Ottolenghi A. Comprehensive track-structure based evaluation of DNA damage by light ions from radiotherapy-relevant energies down to stopping. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7:45161. doi: 10.1038/srep45161.
PMID: 28345622BACKGROUNDWinter M, Dokic I, Schlegel J, Warnken U, Debus J, Abdollahi A, Schnolzer M. Deciphering the Acute Cellular Phosphoproteome Response to Irradiation with X-rays, Protons and Carbon Ions. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2017 May;16(5):855-872. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M116.066597. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
PMID: 28302921BACKGROUNDGrosse N, Fontana AO, Hug EB, Lomax A, Coray A, Augsburger M, Paganetti H, Sartori AA, Pruschy M. Deficiency in homologous recombination renders Mammalian cells more sensitive to proton versus photon irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jan 1;88(1):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.041. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
PMID: 24239385BACKGROUNDTommasino F, Durante M. Proton radiobiology. Cancers (Basel). 2015 Feb 12;7(1):353-81. doi: 10.3390/cancers7010353.
PMID: 25686476BACKGROUNDBryant C, Smith TL, Henderson RH, Hoppe BS, Mendenhall WM, Nichols RC, Morris CG, Williams CR, Su Z, Li Z, Lee D, Mendenhall NP. Five-Year Biochemical Results, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Quality of Life After Delivery of Dose-Escalated Image Guided Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):422-434. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.038. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
PMID: 27084658BACKGROUNDMendenhall NP, Hoppe BS, Nichols RC, Mendenhall WM, Morris CG, Li Z, Su Z, Williams CR, Costa J, Henderson RH. Five-year outcomes from 3 prospective trials of image-guided proton therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 1;88(3):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.007.
PMID: 24521677BACKGROUNDWaddle MR, Sio TT, Van Houten HK, Foote RL, Keole SR, Schild SE, Laack N, Daniels TB, Crown W, Shah ND, Miller RC. Photon and Proton Radiation Therapy Utilization in a Population of More Than 100 Million Commercially Insured Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Dec 1;99(5):1078-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.042. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
PMID: 28939229BACKGROUNDResnick MJ, Koyama T, Fan KH, Albertsen PC, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Hoffman RM, Potosky AL, Stanford JL, Stroup AM, Van Horn RL, Penson DF. Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):436-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209978.
PMID: 23363497BACKGROUNDLiu Y, Patel SA, Jani AB, Gillespie TW, Patel PR, Godette KD, Hershatter BW, Shelton JW, McDonald MW. Overall Survival After Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer With Proton Beam Therapy, External-Beam Photon Therapy, or Brachytherapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Jun;19(3):255-266.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
PMID: 32972877DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nancy P. Mendenhall, MD
University of Florida
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2018
First Posted
June 19, 2018
Study Start
July 5, 2018
Primary Completion
February 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share