The Plasma Diafiltration Therapy of Hepatic Failure
Study of High - Flux Plasma Diafiltration Based on Plasma - Saved Mode in the Treatment of Patients With Hepatic Failure
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
At present, there is no comparative study between the simple plasma exchange and plasma diafiltration (PDF), and no further exploration of optimal plasma dose in PDF treatment. Therefore, this prospective randomized cohort study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of the tree groups(simple plasma exchange group, conventional PDF treatment group, less plasma PDF treatment group)by collecting SOFA score, 3-month survival rate, MELD score, and the times of artificial liver treatment , blood cell variables, cytokines(e.g. TNFα ), pre- and post-treatment plasma ammonia levels. Thus, it is to provide a safer and more effective artificial liver treatment with less plasma dose.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedJune 18, 2018
June 1, 2018
2 years
February 18, 2018
June 6, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD score)
MRLD=R=3.8ln\[TBIL(mg/dl)\]+11.2ln(INR)+9.6ln \[Cr(mg/dl)\]+6.4(etiology:Bile or alcoholic 0,others 1)。
month 3
Secondary Outcomes (6)
cytokine
Month 3
blood platelet count
Month 3
the number of artificial liver treatment
Month3
the concentration of plasma ammonia
Month 3
sequential organ failure assessment score(SOFA score)
Month 3
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
simple plasma exchange group
EXPERIMENTALThe mode is CVVH in CRRT machine, the treatment duration is 2h-3h, the application plasma volume is 40ml/Kg, the replacement fluid flow rate is 1000ml/h, the blood flow rate is 100-140 ml/min, and the ultrafiltration volume is 0ml/h.
conventional PDF treatment group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe mode of conventional PDF treatment group is CVVHDF in CRRT machine, and the duration of treatment is 3 hours. the application plasma volume 1500 ml . The replacement fluid flow rate is 500 ml/h, the dialysate flow rate is 3000 ml/h, the blood flow rate is 100-140 ml/min, and the ultrafiltration volume is 0 ml/h.
less plasma PDF treatment group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe mode of conventional PDF treatment group is also CVVHDF in CRRT machine, and the duration of treatment is 3h. All patients are required to apply plasma 1000ml. Use plasma substitutes: 300ml NS+200ml 5% albumin. The replacement fluid flow rate is 500 ml/h, the dialysate flow rate is 3000 ml/h, the blood flow rate is 100-140 ml/min, and the ultrafiltration volume is 0 ml/h.
Interventions
conventional PDF treatment group
less plasma Plasma diafiltration treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- hepatic failure on Medium period
- Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) \<30 and \>20
- age \> 18 years and \<70years
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Active bleeding or disseminated intravascular coagulation
- allergic to blood products or drugs such as plasma, heparin and protamine
- hemodynamic instability
- cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidental infarction instability Period
- extravascular hemolysis
- severe sepsis
- Tumor on ultrasonography, CT or MRI examination
- Pregnant or lactating women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fuzhou General Hospital, Xiamen Univ
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350025, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2018
First Posted
June 18, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2018
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
June 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share