NCT03560128

Brief Summary

The study aims to compare the results between colonoscopies with two different attachments on the distal end of the colonoscope.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
634

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 12, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 6, 2018

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 18, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 18, 2018

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 8, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 8, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

June 6, 2018

Results QC Date

September 20, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 20, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Colonoscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Adenomas Detected Per Colonoscopy (APC).

    Comparison of the number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy between the Endocuff Vision Colonoscopy and the AmplifEYE colonoscopy.

    During colonoscopy procedure

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Detection Rates (Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) and Polyp Detection Rate (PDR))

    During colonoscopy procedure

  • Complications Encountered During Procedure

    During Colonoscopy procedure

  • Passage of Device Through Sigmoid Colon

    during insertion portion of colonoscopy

  • Polyps Per Colonoscopy (PPC)

    During colonoscopy procedure

  • Time Comparison for Each Method

    During colonoscopy procedure

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Endocuff Vision Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision device attached to the distal end of the scope.

Device: Endocuff Vision device

AmplifEYE Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Colonoscopy with AmplifEYE device attached to the distal end of the scope.

Device: AmplifEYE device

Interventions

Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the Endocuff Vision device will have this device placed on the colonoscope used during their procedure.

Endocuff Vision Arm

Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the AmplifEYE device will have this device placed on the colonoscope used during their procedure.

AmplifEYE Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age or older
  • Undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or diagnostic purposes
  • Able to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Prior resection of the colon
  • Referred for resection of a polyp identified by another physician
  • Referred for a previous incomplete colonoscopy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Rex DK, Repici A, Gross SA, Hassan C, Ponugoti PL, Garcia JR, Broadley HM, Thygesen JC, Sullivan AW, Tippins WW, Main SA, Eckert GJ, Vemulapalli KC. High-definition colonoscopy versus Endocuff versus EndoRings versus full-spectrum endoscopy for adenoma detection at colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug;88(2):335-344.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.043. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

    PMID: 29530353BACKGROUND
  • Rex DK, Sagi SV, Kessler WR, Rogers NA, Fischer M, Bohm ME, Dewitt JM, Lahr RE, Searight MP, Sullivan AW, McWhinney CD, Garcia JR, Broadley HM, Vemulapalli KC. A comparison of 2 distal attachment mucosal exposure devices: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Nov;90(5):835-840.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.06.046. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Coordinator
Organization
Indiana University

Study Officials

  • Douglas K Rex, MD

    Indiana University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2018

First Posted

June 18, 2018

Study Start

April 12, 2018

Primary Completion

December 18, 2018

Study Completion

December 18, 2018

Last Updated

October 8, 2019

Results First Posted

October 8, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

De-identified data can be shared in the future upon request.

Locations