Pain Reduction Using Two Cold Irrigating Protocols in Teeth With Vital Pulps.
EP18
Pain Reduction After One-visit Root Canal Treatment Using Two Cold Irrigating Protocols in Teeth With Vital Pulps.
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical research was to relate the incidence of post-endodontic pain after one-visit root canal treatment using two cold protocols of irrigation. Methodology: All 240 patients had upper or lower molar, premolar or anterior teeth selected for conventional root canal treatment for prosthetic reasons detected with only vital pulps (symptomatic or asymptomatic condition). Of the sample of 240 teeth, were selected to different manner to irrigate. Reciproc instruments were used with a micro motor (VDW, Munich Germany). Final irrigation with cold (6oC, 2.5 oC and room temperature 17% EDTA and saline solution served as a lubricants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 7, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 8, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2018
CompletedJune 15, 2018
June 1, 2018
1 day
May 10, 2018
June 14, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the post-endodontic pain after one-visit after the root canal treatment with reciprocating NiTi system.
Pain was evaluated after 24, 48 and 72 hrs after instrumentation with reciproc NiTi instruments, the 80 canals were flushed with cold irrigants (6 and 2.5 oC). According to the VAS table provided to the participants
24 hours to 72 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the Use of intracanal cryotherapy on post-endodontic pain after single-visit RC.
24 hours to 72 hours
Study Arms (3)
Group A. Cold Protocol with 6 oC
EXPERIMENTALUse of 20 mL cold (6 oC) sterile saline solution. After the clinical procedure cryotherapy was applied. 5 mL cold (6 oC) 17% EDTA followed with 20 mL cold (6 oC) sterile saline solution dispensed to the WL using a cold (6 oC) metallic micro-cannula included in the Endo Vac System for five minutes.
Group B. Cold Protocol with 2.5 oC
EXPERIMENTALUse of 20 mL cold (2.5 oC) sterile saline solution After the procedure cryotherapy was applied. 5 mL cold (2.5 oC) 17% EDTA followed with 20 mL cold (2.5 oC) sterile saline solution dispensed to the WL using a cold (2.5 oC) metallic micro-cannula included in the Endo Vac System for five minutes.
CG. Room temperature Protocol
EXPERIMENTALUse of 20 mL (at room temperature) sterile saline solution The group will receive irrigant at room temperature. 5mL of 17% EDTA and 20 mL of sterile saline usingmetallic micro-cannula included in the Endo Vac System for five minutes.
Interventions
Patients assigned to this group receive a final irrigation with 5 mL cold (6 oC) 17% EDTA followed with 20 mL cold (6 oC) sterile saline solution dispensed to the WL using a cold (6 oC) metallic micro-cannula included in the Endo Vac System (Kerr Endo) for 5 minutes.
Patients assigned to this group receive a final irrigation with 5 mL cold (2.5 oC) 17% EDTA followed with 20 mL cold (2.5 oC) sterile saline solution dispensed to the WL using a cold (2.5 oC) metallic micro-cannula included in the Endo Vac System for five minutes.
Patients assigned to this control group were treated identically to the experimental groups, except that receive a final flush with 5 mL (room temperature) 17% EDTA followed with twenty mL (room temperature) sterile saline solution delivered to the WL using a metallic micro-cannula included in the Endo Vac System for five minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- absence of radiographic sign of apical pathosis and a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis (IP) and vital pulp established by affirmative response to hot and cold examinations.
- Thermal pulp examination was achieved by the corresponding author, and radiographic analysis was established by 3 certified endodontists.
- Clinical requirements were established on the next conditions: 1) The purposes and necessities of the research were spontaneously accepted. 2) Clinical Management was pointed to patients in physical and mental well- being. 3) All teeth had vital pulps and absence of apical periodontitis. 4) Positive thermal stimulation with EndoIce (Hygenic Corp, Akron, OH). 5) Teeth with enough coronal structure for rubber dam isolation. 6) No root canal therapy done before the research. 7) No painkillers or antibiotics used 7 days' prior the clinical events started.
You may not qualify if:
- the necessity for retreatment
- pregnancy
- impossibility to obtain patient's approval
- a history of medication for chronic pain or those compromising the immune response
- patients younger than 18 years and the existence of mishaps or difficulties during RCT (calcified canals, impracticality of achieving Apical patency).
- Root fractures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Jorge Paredes Vieyra
Tijuana, Baja Califronia, 22000, Mexico
Jorge Paredes Vieyra
Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, 22000, Mexico
Jose Clemente
Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, 22000, Mexico
Related Publications (1)
Paredes-Vieyra J, Enriquez FJ. Success rate of single- versus two-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
PMID: 22892729BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Certified endodontist (3) trained in the procedures, devices, and irrigating systems investigated took part in the research. All experts tracked a pre-established procedure for Reciproc instrument systems and cryotherapy.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- DDS, MsC, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2018
First Posted
June 15, 2018
Study Start
March 7, 2018
Primary Completion
March 8, 2018
Study Completion
April 30, 2018
Last Updated
June 15, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share