NCT03555383

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the hemostatic changes defined as hemostasis reserve capacity (HRC) in the first perioperative 48 hours of bloodless liver transplanted patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
59

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 24, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 13, 2018

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 2, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

April 24, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 1, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

bloodless transplantationhemostasis reserve capacitysurgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change of coagulation factor levels and hemostasis reserve capacity during bloodless liver transplantation from baseline till the second postoperative day

    Based on coagulation factors measurements the allowable blood loss is calculated and defined as hemostasis reserve capacity till compulsory coagulation factor or blood products replacement is needed to avoid coagulopathic bleeding in the perioperative phase of liver transplantation. The changes of the measured coagulation factors and the hemostasis reserve capacity is counted at the different meaning points: baseline-before liver transplantation (T1), after successful liver transplantation at arrival on intensive care unit-ICU (T2) and postoperatively according to the graft function: 12 hours after liver transplantation (T3), 24 hours after liver transplantation (T4), 48 hours after liver transplantation (T5).

    Participants will be followed preoperatively, postoperative 0,12, 24, 48. hours after liver transplantation

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Length of Intensive Care Unit stay

    An expected average of 3 days

  • Length of hospital stay

    An expected average of 2 weeks

Interventions

The minimal functional hemostasis reserve capacity are defined by triggers as hematocrit: 27%, platelets: 30 G/l, Fibrinogen (FI): 1g/l, FII-FV-FVII-FX: 30%, Antithrombin III: 40%, FXIII: 60% levels. The estimate blood volume methodology is used for to determine the amount of allowable blood loss in volume (ml) that does not require replacement based on current and trigger levels. The individualized pyramid of intervention defined as hemostasis reserve capacity are followed at every studied patient. All measurements and calculations are performed before liver transplantation (T1), at arrival on Intensive Care Unit (T2) and 12-24-48 hours after liver transplantation (T3-4-5).

Also known as: Calculation of hemostasis reserve capacity

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients who underwent bloodless liver transplantation in Semmelweis University Department of Transplantation and Surgery

You may qualify if:

  • All bloodless liver transplanted patients in Semmelweis University Department of Transplantation and Surgery will be included in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with:
  • Required Red Blood Cells (RBC), Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) or platelets replacement in the perioperative first 48 hours, pediatric patients (age \< 18 years) and acut liver failure patients.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Semmelweis University

Budapest, Pest County, 1082, Hungary

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Baron DM, Metnitz PG, Fellinger T, Metnitz B, Rhodes A, Kozek-Langenecker SA. Evaluation of clinical practice in perioperative patient blood management. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Nov;117(5):610-616. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew308.

    PMID: 27799175BACKGROUND
  • Bidlingmaier C, Olivieri M, Hutker S, Dietl S, Kurnik K. Perioperative management of hemostasis in children and adolescents. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2017 Sep;67:91-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 16.

    PMID: 28130047BACKGROUND
  • Gibon E, Courpied JP, Hamadouche M. Total joint replacement and blood loss: what is the best equation? Int Orthop. 2013 Apr;37(4):735-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1801-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

    PMID: 23385607BACKGROUND
  • Goel R, Cushing MM, Tobian AA. Pediatric Patient Blood Management Programs: Not Just Transfusing Little Adults. Transfus Med Rev. 2016 Oct;30(4):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 1.

    PMID: 27559005BACKGROUND
  • Gorlinger K. [Coagulation management during liver transplantation]. Hamostaseologie. 2006 Aug;26(3 Suppl 1):S64-76. German.

    PMID: 16953295BACKGROUND
  • Kahvecioglu D, Erdeve O, Alan S, Cakir U, Yildiz D, Atasay B, Arsan S. The impact of evaluating platelet transfusion need by platelet mass index on reducing the unnecessary transfusions in newborns. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Nov;27(17):1787-9. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.879708. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

    PMID: 24397345BACKGROUND
  • Keir AK, Stanworth SJ. Neonatal Plasma Transfusion: An Evidence-Based Review. Transfus Med Rev. 2016 Oct;30(4):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

    PMID: 27473518BACKGROUND
  • Kozek-Langenecker SA, Ahmed AB, Afshari A, Albaladejo P, Aldecoa C, Barauskas G, De Robertis E, Faraoni D, Filipescu DC, Fries D, Haas T, Jacob M, Lance MD, Pitarch JVL, Mallett S, Meier J, Molnar ZL, Rahe-Meyer N, Samama CM, Stensballe J, Van der Linden PJF, Wikkelso AJ, Wouters P, Wyffels P, Zacharowski K. Management of severe perioperative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology: First update 2016. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Jun;34(6):332-395. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000630.

    PMID: 28459785BACKGROUND
  • Lang H, Mouracade P, Gimel P, Bernhard JC, Pignot G, Zini L, Crepel M, Rigaud J, Salomon L, Bellec L, Vaessen C, Roupret M, Jung JL, Mourey E, Martin X, Bigot P, Bruyere F, Berger J, Ansieau JP, Salome F, Hubert J, Pfister C, Trifard F, Gigante M, Baumert H, Mejean A, Patard JJ. National prospective study on the use of local haemostatic agents during partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5b):E56-61. doi: 10.1111/bju.12397. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

    PMID: 24053412BACKGROUND
  • Massicotte L, Denault AY, Thibeault L, Hevesi Z, Nozza A, Roy A. Relationship between conventional coagulation tests and bleeding for 600 consecutive liver transplantations. Transplantation. 2014 Jul 27;98(2):e13-5. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000253. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25022237BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Postoperative HemorrhageHemostatic Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPostoperative ComplicationsVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesHemorrhagic DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Leader

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2018

First Posted

June 13, 2018

Study Start

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion

August 1, 2020

Study Completion

August 31, 2020

Last Updated

September 2, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Locations