NCT03554057

Brief Summary

This study aims to reduce patient risk and costs to the healthcare system by improving the diagnostic yield of invasive coronary angiography through existing triage processes to improve risk stratification using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) as a first step in low risk patients. All low-risk patients referred for invasive coronary angiography will be potentially eligible for CCTA instead of invasive angiography as a first-line diagnostic test. All CCTAs will be read by both a level 3-trained cardiologist and a radiologist. The results of the CCTA, coupled with evidence-based management recommendations will be sent to the referring physician and an invasive angiogram will be arranged by the HIU triage, only when clearly indicated

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
186

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 30, 2018

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 12, 2018

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 9, 2018

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 16, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

May 30, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 14, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Angiogram, Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic yield of invasive angiography

    Diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of invasive angiograms that identify significant disease (≥70% stenosis) on a major coronary vessel (\>2 mm) or \> 50% stenosis in the left main)

    Three years

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Quantitative assessment of angiograms avoided

    Three years

  • Deviation from management recommendations following CCTA

    Three years

  • Protocol deviation as a surrogate for acceptability of the novel triage program

    Three years

  • Costing of new strategy

    Three years

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Group

All low-risk patients referred for invasive coronary angiography through the Hamilton General Hospital's Heart Investigation Unit Triage will be potentially eligible to receive the intervention over a 12-month period. The intervention will include risk stratification with CCTA at HHS and NHS as an alternative to upfront invasive angiography.

Diagnostic Test: Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography

Control Group

Intervention sites will act as their own controls: outcomes of all eligible patients in the 24-months prior to the implementation of the intervention will be assessed from a routinely collected health administrative database. Eligible patients not undergoing CCTA (patient or physician refusal, or CCTA not available) will be captured and included in the control group as part of a sensitivity analysis during the intervention period

Interventions

All low-risk patients referred for invasive coronary angiography will be potentially eligible to receive the intervention over a 12-month period. The intervention will include risk stratification using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) at HHS and NHS as an alternative to upfront invasive angiography. All CCTAs will be read by both a level 3-trained cardiologist and a radiologist. The results of the CCTA, coupled with evidence-based management recommendations will be sent to the referring physician and an invasive angiogram will be arranged only when indicated as per these management recommendations

Intervention Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All eligible low-risk patients referred for invasive angiography will be recruited from the two interventional sites (approximately 240) via centralized triage process. Patients treated before the intervention implementation will be the control group (approximately 480).

You may qualify if:

  • Non urgent outpatient referral
  • Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I or II
  • Indication for invasive angiogram includes: Rule out Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and Cardiomyopathy

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \<18 years old, Men \>65 years old or women \>75 years old
  • Patient refusal to provide verbal consent for CCTA at time of triage contact or unable to provide informed consent
  • Referring physician refusal for their eligible patients to be approached for the CarDIA study
  • Any prior CCTA
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Creatinine \> 150 mmol/L
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • High risk Exercise Stress Test or Functional Imaging
  • Known severe valvular disease being considered for valve surgery
  • Any known CAD
  • Prior Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
  • Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hamilton General Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2, Canada

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Roth GA, Forouzanfar MH, Moran AE, Barber R, Nguyen G, Feigin VL, Naghavi M, Mensah GA, Murray CJ. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1333-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406656.

    PMID: 25830423BACKGROUND
  • Sheth T, Amlani S, Ellins ML, Mehta S, Velianou J, Cappelli G, Yang S, Natarajan M. Computed tomographic coronary angiographic assessment of high-risk coronary anatomy in patients with suspected coronary artery disease and intermediate pretest probability. Am Heart J. 2008 May;155(5):918-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.035. Epub 2008 Feb 19.

    PMID: 18440342BACKGROUND
  • Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV, Brindis RG, Douglas PS. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 11;362(10):886-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907272.

    PMID: 20220183BACKGROUND
  • Ouellette ML, Beller GA, Loffler AI, Workman VK, Bourque JM. Appropriate Referrals of Angiography Despite High Prevalence of Normal Coronary Arteries or Nonobstructive CAD. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 30;69(21):2673-2675. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.565. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28545644BACKGROUND
  • Dewey M, Rief M, Martus P, Kendziora B, Feger S, Dreger H, Priem S, Knebel F, Bohm M, Schlattmann P, Hamm B, Schonenberger E, Laule M, Zimmermann E. Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with atypical angina or chest pain clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5441.

    PMID: 27777234BACKGROUND
  • Zhang F, Wagner AK, Ross-Degnan D. Simulation-based power calculation for designing interrupted time series analyses of health policy interventions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1252-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.02.007.

    PMID: 21640554BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Jon-David Schwalm, MD,FRCPC,Msc

    Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Tej Sheth, Bsc,FRCPC,MD

    Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2018

First Posted

June 12, 2018

Study Start

July 9, 2018

Primary Completion

February 28, 2020

Study Completion

March 1, 2022

Last Updated

March 16, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations