CCTA to Optimize the Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography
CarDIA
Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize the Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography in Lower Risk Patients
1 other identifier
observational
186
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to reduce patient risk and costs to the healthcare system by improving the diagnostic yield of invasive coronary angiography through existing triage processes to improve risk stratification using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) as a first step in low risk patients. All low-risk patients referred for invasive coronary angiography will be potentially eligible for CCTA instead of invasive angiography as a first-line diagnostic test. All CCTAs will be read by both a level 3-trained cardiologist and a radiologist. The results of the CCTA, coupled with evidence-based management recommendations will be sent to the referring physician and an invasive angiogram will be arranged by the HIU triage, only when clearly indicated
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2018
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 16, 2022
March 1, 2022
1.6 years
May 30, 2018
March 14, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic yield of invasive angiography
Diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of invasive angiograms that identify significant disease (≥70% stenosis) on a major coronary vessel (\>2 mm) or \> 50% stenosis in the left main)
Three years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Quantitative assessment of angiograms avoided
Three years
Deviation from management recommendations following CCTA
Three years
Protocol deviation as a surrogate for acceptability of the novel triage program
Three years
Costing of new strategy
Three years
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
All low-risk patients referred for invasive coronary angiography through the Hamilton General Hospital's Heart Investigation Unit Triage will be potentially eligible to receive the intervention over a 12-month period. The intervention will include risk stratification with CCTA at HHS and NHS as an alternative to upfront invasive angiography.
Control Group
Intervention sites will act as their own controls: outcomes of all eligible patients in the 24-months prior to the implementation of the intervention will be assessed from a routinely collected health administrative database. Eligible patients not undergoing CCTA (patient or physician refusal, or CCTA not available) will be captured and included in the control group as part of a sensitivity analysis during the intervention period
Interventions
All low-risk patients referred for invasive coronary angiography will be potentially eligible to receive the intervention over a 12-month period. The intervention will include risk stratification using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) at HHS and NHS as an alternative to upfront invasive angiography. All CCTAs will be read by both a level 3-trained cardiologist and a radiologist. The results of the CCTA, coupled with evidence-based management recommendations will be sent to the referring physician and an invasive angiogram will be arranged only when indicated as per these management recommendations
Eligibility Criteria
All eligible low-risk patients referred for invasive angiography will be recruited from the two interventional sites (approximately 240) via centralized triage process. Patients treated before the intervention implementation will be the control group (approximately 480).
You may qualify if:
- Non urgent outpatient referral
- Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I or II
- Indication for invasive angiogram includes: Rule out Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and Cardiomyopathy
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years old, Men \>65 years old or women \>75 years old
- Patient refusal to provide verbal consent for CCTA at time of triage contact or unable to provide informed consent
- Referring physician refusal for their eligible patients to be approached for the CarDIA study
- Any prior CCTA
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Creatinine \> 150 mmol/L
- Diabetes mellitus
- High risk Exercise Stress Test or Functional Imaging
- Known severe valvular disease being considered for valve surgery
- Any known CAD
- Prior Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
- Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2, Canada
Related Publications (6)
Roth GA, Forouzanfar MH, Moran AE, Barber R, Nguyen G, Feigin VL, Naghavi M, Mensah GA, Murray CJ. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1333-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406656.
PMID: 25830423BACKGROUNDSheth T, Amlani S, Ellins ML, Mehta S, Velianou J, Cappelli G, Yang S, Natarajan M. Computed tomographic coronary angiographic assessment of high-risk coronary anatomy in patients with suspected coronary artery disease and intermediate pretest probability. Am Heart J. 2008 May;155(5):918-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.035. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
PMID: 18440342BACKGROUNDPatel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV, Brindis RG, Douglas PS. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 11;362(10):886-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907272.
PMID: 20220183BACKGROUNDOuellette ML, Beller GA, Loffler AI, Workman VK, Bourque JM. Appropriate Referrals of Angiography Despite High Prevalence of Normal Coronary Arteries or Nonobstructive CAD. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 30;69(21):2673-2675. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.565. No abstract available.
PMID: 28545644BACKGROUNDDewey M, Rief M, Martus P, Kendziora B, Feger S, Dreger H, Priem S, Knebel F, Bohm M, Schlattmann P, Hamm B, Schonenberger E, Laule M, Zimmermann E. Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with atypical angina or chest pain clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5441.
PMID: 27777234BACKGROUNDZhang F, Wagner AK, Ross-Degnan D. Simulation-based power calculation for designing interrupted time series analyses of health policy interventions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1252-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.02.007.
PMID: 21640554BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jon-David Schwalm, MD,FRCPC,Msc
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tej Sheth, Bsc,FRCPC,MD
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2018
First Posted
June 12, 2018
Study Start
July 9, 2018
Primary Completion
February 28, 2020
Study Completion
March 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share