NCT03548922

Brief Summary

Pectus carinatum (PC) is a deformity of the anterior chest wall which is a common pediatric condition, characterized by an idiopathic overgrowth of the costal cartilages resulting in protrusion of the sternum. Knowing factors influencing pressure of correction may lead successful treatment outcomes. In a study by Lee and colleagues investigating the effectiveness of the orthosis, it was found that patients with advanced Tanner stage of pubertal development had a longer time for correction of deformity. Martinez-Ferro et al proposed that pectus carinatum may return mildly, in approximately 10% of cured patients, particularly if they have been treated before pubertal growth spurts or in case they have cured very rapidly. To the best of our knowledge factors influencing pressure of correction and treatment outcomes after compressive bracing have not been investigated before. Our aim is to investigate impact of Risser stage on pressure of correction in PC.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2018

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2018

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2018

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 3, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

May 20, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 1, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

RisserTannerpressure of correction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Risser (a measure showing the growth left in the spine)

    stage 0: no ossification center at the level of iliac crest apophysis stage 1: apophysis under 25% of the iliac crest stage 2: apophysis over 25-50% of the iliac crest stage 3: apophysis over 50-75% of the iliac crest stage 4: apophysis over \>75% of the iliac crest stage 5: complete ossification and fusion of the iliac crest apophysis

    Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Tanner (a scale of physical pubertal development in children, adolescents and adults)

    Day 0

  • pressure of correction (an indirect parameter of the chest wall's flexibility. It is defined as the pressure applied to the patient, in the most protruding area of the chest, needed to accomplish a proper shape of the thorax)

    Day 0

  • Pectus carinatum protrusion (distance from the point of maximum protrusion to the estimated normal level of chest wall)

    Day 0

Study Arms (1)

Pectus carinatum

Demographic data (age, sex), pressure of correction, Tanner stage, Risser stage, Haller index, pectus carinatum protrusion measurements of patients with pectus carinatum will be recorded and association of them with pressure of correction will be investigated.

Other: Tanner stageOther: Risser stageOther: Pressure of correctionOther: Pectus carinatum protrusion

Interventions

a scale of pubertal development in children, adolescents

Pectus carinatum

a measure showing the growth left in the spine

Pectus carinatum

an indirect parameter of the chest wall's flexibility. It is defined as the pressure applied to the patient, in the most protruding area of the chest, needed to accomplish a proper shape of the thorax.

Pectus carinatum

distance from the point of maximum protrusion to the estimated normal level of chest wall

Pectus carinatum

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 22 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients with pectus carinatum who never experienced brace before

You may qualify if:

  • Chondro-gladiolar pectus carinatum (PC)
  • Patients with PC between the ages of 8-24 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who previously used compression brace
  • Chondro-manubrial PC
  • Severe scoliosis (Cobb angle\>20 degrees)
  • Systemic chronic disease
  • Complex anomaly, PC as a part of syndrome
  • he history of surgical correction of scoliosis or pectus deformity.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Marmara University School of Medicine Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Istanbul, 34899, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

  • Fokin AA, Steuerwald NM, Ahrens WA, Allen KE. Anatomical, histologic, and genetic characteristics of congenital chest wall deformities. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Spring;21(1):44-57. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.03.001.

    PMID: 19632563BACKGROUND
  • Martinez-Ferro M, Bellia Munzon G, Fraire C, Abdenur C, Chinni E, Strappa B, Ardigo L. Non-surgical treatment of pectus carinatum with the FMF(R) Dynamic Compressor System. J Vis Surg. 2016 Mar 17;2:57. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2016.02.20. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 29078485BACKGROUND
  • Kravarusic D, Dicken BJ, Dewar R, Harder J, Poncet P, Schneider M, Sigalet DL. The Calgary protocol for bracing of pectus carinatum: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 May;41(5):923-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.01.058.

    PMID: 16677884BACKGROUND
  • de Beer SA, Gritter M, de Jong JR, van Heurn ELW. The Dynamic Compression Brace for Pectus Carinatum: Intermediate Results in 286 Patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jun;103(6):1742-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

    PMID: 28274516BACKGROUND
  • Lee RT, Moorman S, Schneider M, Sigalet DL. Bracing is an effective therapy for pectus carinatum: interim results. J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Jan;48(1):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.10.037.

    PMID: 23331813BACKGROUND
  • Kang DY, Jung J, Chung S, Cho J, Lee S. Factors affecting patient compliance with compressive brace therapy for pectus carinatum. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Dec;19(6):900-3. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu280. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

    PMID: 25164133BACKGROUND
  • http://www0.sun.ac.za/ortho/webct-ortho/age/risser.html -].

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pectus Carinatum

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone Diseases, DevelopmentalBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesCartilage DiseasesMusculoskeletal AbnormalitiesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Mustafa Yuksel, Prof

    Marmara University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Gulseren Akyuz, Prof

    Marmara University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Esra Giray, MD

    Marmara University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Onur Ermenak, Asist Prof

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2018

First Posted

June 7, 2018

Study Start

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion

December 1, 2019

Study Completion

December 1, 2019

Last Updated

July 3, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations