Study Stopped
Study stopped due to technical reasons
Online Contingent Attention Training (OCAT)
Innovative Attention Training to Achieve Stable Remission in Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a smartphone-delivered attention control training as a preventive intervention for remitted depressed patients. Additionally, the investigators aim to increase the effect of this CBM-intervention by adding a psychoeducation module (CBT-intervention). To test this aim, participants will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) an experimental training condition with prior psychoeducation, (2) an experimental training condition without prior psychoeducation, or (3) a placebo training condition serving as an active control condition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started May 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedNovember 10, 2022
November 1, 2022
3.6 years
May 15, 2018
November 7, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in depression, anxiety, and stress
Measured by the 21-item version of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21)
Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months)
Change in rumination
Measured by the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS). This 22-item questionnaire provides a total rumination score (range: 22 - 88), as well as Brooding and Reflection subscale scores (range: 5 - 20). Brooding is characterized by a passive style of moody pondering and is the most maladaptive form of depressive rumination. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change in attentional bias
Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period)
Change in reappraisal
Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period)
Change in negative emotions (after reappraisal)
Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period)
Change in (mal-)adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies
Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months)
Change in maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies: State rumination
Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
User engagement
Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period)
Study Arms (3)
Attention Training
EXPERIMENTALOCAT-only: An attention training, consisting of 10 sessions of ±12 minutes each (during an intervention period of two weeks), will be administered. The training task is a positively directed Scrambled Sentences Test (SST) with mouse-gaze contingent feedback.
Active placebo training
ACTIVE COMPARATOROCAT-sham: An active placebo training, consisting of 10 sessions of ±12 minutes each (during an intervention period of two weeks), will be administered. The training task is an undirected Scrambled Sentences Test (SST) with mouse-gaze contingent feedback.
PSE and Attention Training
EXPERIMENTALOCAT-combo: An online PSE session prior to an attention training, consisting of 10 sessions of ±12 minutes each (during an intervention period of two weeks), will be administered. Content of the PSE will focus on how adaptive functions of automatic and controlled processes may become maladaptive when used inappropriately or excessively. The training task is a positively directed Scrambled Sentences Test (SST) with mouse-gaze contingent feedback.
Interventions
online-contingent Attention Training without prior psychoeducation
Placebo version of Online contingent Attention Training without prior psychoeducation
Online contingent Attention Training with prior psychoeducation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- History of ≥ 1 depressive episodes (major or bipolar)
- Currently in stable full or partial remission (≥ 3 months)
- Being in possession of a recent computer (needed to install the training software)
You may not qualify if:
- Major depressive disorder (current or less than 3 months in remission)
- Bipolar disorder (current or less than 3 months in remission)
- Psychotic disorder (current and/or previous)
- Neurological impairments (current and/or previous)
- Excessive substance abuse (current and/or previous)
- Ongoing psychotherapeutic treatment (maintenance treatment is allowed, but with a frequency of less than once every three weeks)
- Use of antidepressant medication is allowed if kept at a constant level
- Not being in possession of a recent computer (needed to install the training software)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Ghentlead
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium
Related Publications (2)
Sanchez A, Everaert J, Koster EH. Attention training through gaze-contingent feedback: Effects on reappraisal and negative emotions. Emotion. 2016 Oct;16(7):1074-85. doi: 10.1037/emo0000198. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
PMID: 27322115BACKGROUNDVanderhasselt MA, De Raedt R, De Paepe A, Aarts K, Otte G, Van Dorpe J, Pourtois G. Abnormal proactive and reactive cognitive control during conflict processing in major depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014 Feb;123(1):68-80. doi: 10.1037/a0035816.
PMID: 24661161BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ernst Koster
University Ghent
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2018
First Posted
June 7, 2018
Study Start
May 7, 2018
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
November 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share