NCT03548116

Brief Summary

This is a seven-cohort, double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled feasibility trial to determine whether organ-specific biological effects are achievable through selective ultrasound of the spleen utilizing low-energy insonification.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
137

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 23, 2018

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 11, 2018

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2018

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 13, 2020

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 14, 2021

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

May 11, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 13, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Healthy VolunteerUltrasoundInsonificationSpleen

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Anti-inflammatory Response

    The primary outcome to determine whether diagnostic-level ultrasound to the spleen has a biological effect is measured as a statistically significant change in the level of biomarkers associated with the inflammatory response following delivery of ultrasound.

    The primary outcome will be assessed before ultrasound and at 1-hour, 2-hours, and 24-hours after receiving ultrasound.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Transient Tissue Displacement

    The secondary outcome will be assessed approximately every 15 seconds during the approximately 10-minute ultrasound.

Study Arms (7)

Group 1

SHAM COMPARATOR

Individuals will receive sham non-imaging mode ultrasound (control group) delivered to just the spleen's hilum (area of spleen that allows passage of blood vessels, lymphatic vessels, and nerves).

Device: Sham Ultrasound

Group 2

EXPERIMENTAL

Individuals will receive half-powered non-imaging mode ultrasound delivered to just the spleen's hilum (area of spleen that allows passage of blood vessels, lymphatic vessels, and nerves).

Device: Ultrasound

Group 3

EXPERIMENTAL

Individuals will receive full-powered non-imaging mode ultrasound delivered to just the spleen's hilum (area of spleen that allows passage of blood vessels, lymphatic vessels, and nerves).

Device: Ultrasound

Group 4

SHAM COMPARATOR

Individuals will receive sham non-imaging mode ultrasound (control group) delivered to the lower, middle, and upper spleen based on the spleen's size.

Device: Sham Ultrasound

Group 5

EXPERIMENTAL

Individuals will receive half-powered non-imaging mode ultrasound delivered to the lower, middle, and upper spleen based on the spleen's size.

Device: Ultrasound

Group 6

EXPERIMENTAL

Individuals will receive full-powered non-imaging mode ultrasound delivered to the lower, middle, and upper spleen based on the spleen's size.

Device: Ultrasound

Group 7

SHAM COMPARATOR

Individuals will receive sham non-imaging mode ultrasound with a disconnected probe (control group) delivered to just the spleen's hilum (area of spleen that allows passage of blood vessels, lymphatic vessels, and nerves).

Device: Sham Ultrasound

Interventions

A specially designed ultrasound will be placed against the abdomen of an individual in order to administer low levels of insonification to the spleen.

Group 2Group 3Group 5Group 6

A specially designed ultrasound will be placed against the abdomen of an individual in order to administer sham insonification to the spleen.

Group 1Group 4Group 7

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals between 18 and 45 years of age
  • Individuals without physical disabilities or conditions/diseases that may make them incapable of undergoing the study procedures or otherwise places them at a greater risk of harm
  • Individuals without significant past medical or surgical histories that would render them at a greater risk of harm
  • Individuals that are considered English Proficient due to the study requirements to follow verbal commands during the ultrasound session
  • Individuals that are considered active as assessed by type of activity (i.e., walking, running, etc.) and number of hours a week performing the various activities
  • Individuals able to attend all study visits at approximately the same time of day (i.e., 8 - 12 pm)
  • Individuals that are able to comprehend the study goals and procedures, and are able to provide informed consent for participation

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals participating in another research study that may affect the conduct or results of this study
  • Individuals considered substantially overweight or obese via body mass index (≥ 29)
  • Individuals having or exhibiting any of the following:
  • surgery in the past 90 days
  • previous surgery of the spleen or splenectomy, esophagus, lungs, stomach, duodenum, or liver
  • recent traumatic injury, including intracerebral hemorrhage and visceral injury
  • end stage renal disease and/or uremia
  • active malignancy
  • previous leukemia and/or lymphoma
  • human immunodeficiency virus infection or AIDS
  • rheumatoid arthritis or other immune-mediated diseases (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease)
  • arrhythmias, including but not limited to, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, clinically significant bradycardia, ventricular arrhythmias, and A-V block
  • implanted pacemaker or cardioverter/defibrillator (AICD)
  • a history of stable or unstable angina, myocardial infarction, angioplasty or coronary arterial by-pass grafting surgery
  • history of stroke or TIA
  • +31 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Northwell Health's The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research

Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Koopman FA, Chavan SS, Miljko S, Grazio S, Sokolovic S, Schuurman PR, Mehta AD, Levine YA, Faltys M, Zitnik R, Tracey KJ, Tak PP. Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cytokine production and attenuates disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 19;113(29):8284-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605635113. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

    PMID: 27382171BACKGROUND
  • Zeng W, Pirzgalska RM, Pereira MM, Kubasova N, Barateiro A, Seixas E, Lu YH, Kozlova A, Voss H, Martins GG, Friedman JM, Domingos AI. Sympathetic neuro-adipose connections mediate leptin-driven lipolysis. Cell. 2015 Sep 24;163(1):84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.055.

    PMID: 26406372BACKGROUND
  • Parker JL, Cameron T. Technology for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. Prog Neurol Surg. 2015;29:1-19. doi: 10.1159/000434651. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

    PMID: 26394391BACKGROUND
  • Birk DM, Yin D, Slavin KV. Regulation of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Technology. Prog Neurol Surg. 2015;29:225-37. doi: 10.1159/000434674. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

    PMID: 26394389BACKGROUND
  • Tracey KJ. Physiology and immunology of the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway. J Clin Invest. 2007 Feb;117(2):289-96. doi: 10.1172/JCI30555.

    PMID: 17273548BACKGROUND
  • Martelli D, McKinley MJ, McAllen RM. The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway: a critical review. Auton Neurosci. 2014 May;182:65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2013.12.007. Epub 2013 Dec 24.

    PMID: 24411268BACKGROUND
  • Juan EJ, Gonzalez R, Albors G, Ward MP, Irazoqui P. Vagus Nerve Modulation Using Focused Pulsed Ultrasound: Potential Applications and Preliminary Observations in a Rat. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 2014 Mar 1;24(1):67-71. doi: 10.1002/ima.22080.

    PMID: 25165410BACKGROUND
  • Goggins E, Inoue H, Okusa MD. Neuroimmune Control of Inflammation in Acute Kidney Injury and Multiorgan Dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Dec 1;36(12):2473-2484. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000813. Epub 2025 Jul 7.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Ultrasonography

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Study Officials

  • John Pellerito, MD

    Northwell Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The study participants will be blinded to their group assignment for the entire duration of the study. The study investigators will also be blinded to participant assignments on this study, except for the investigators performing the ultrasound procedure, co-investigators randomizing the participants, and co-investigators involved in the study's monitoring.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: After a screened individual is deemed eligible for continued participation, a study investigator will enter the participant's information into a randomization portal in order to receive the group assignment.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Vice Chairman of Education, Department of Radiology; Director, Peripheral Vascular Laboratory and the Body Imaging Fellowship Program

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2018

First Posted

June 7, 2018

Study Start

April 23, 2018

Primary Completion

March 13, 2020

Study Completion

November 1, 2022

Last Updated

December 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Currently, there are no plans to make individual participant data available.

Locations