BIO REsponse Adapted Combination Therapy Pilot Study
Evaluation of Adjunctive Procedural Assessments to Diagnose Post Drug-coated Balloon Flow-limiting Dissection and Residual Stenosis When Angiography is Inconclusive
1 other identifier
interventional
150
5 countries
14
Brief Summary
Both drug-coated balloon and stents have been used for a number of years to treat subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and are recognized as very good treatment methods. However, due to a higher risk of blood clot formation, requiring a longer anticoagulant treatment, and the challenge of treating re growth of tissue extending through the metal mesh of the stent, the physicians try to reserve stent placement to situation where it's really needed, in case of flow-limiting vessel dissection or acute re-narrowing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of several procedural diagnostic techniques in helping the physicians to better decide whether a stent is needed or not. The study will also estimate the safety and efficacy of Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon associated to Pulsar 18 bare metal stent when and where needed to treat PAD
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 3, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2024
CompletedAugust 29, 2022
August 1, 2022
3.2 years
May 18, 2018
August 24, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
diagnostic accuracy of duplex ultrasound
specificity and sensitivity of duplex ultrasound combined to angiography vs angiography alone
during index procedure
Secondary Outcomes (22)
diagnostic accuracy of intraarterial pressure measurement
during index procedure
diagnostic accuracy of intraarterial pressure measurement with IVUS
during index procedure
Target lesion stenting rate
during index procedure
Number of stents used per target lesion
during index procedure
Average stent length per target lesion
during index procedure
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Duplex Ultrasound (DUS)
EXPERIMENTALStandard angiography and DUS are performed on the same patients (paired data)
IVUS with Intraarterial pressure measurement (IAP)
EXPERIMENTALStandard angiography and Intra-Vascular Ultrasound (IVUS) with Intraarterial pressure measurement (IAP) are performed on the same patients (paired data)
Interventions
Occurrence of a flow-limiting dissection or residual stenosis will be assessed by standard angiography and Duplex Ultrasound
Occurrence of a flow-limiting dissection or residual stenosis will be assessed by standard angiography and Intra-vascular ultrasound associated to Intraarterial pressure measurement if needed
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has provided written informed consent before any study specific test or procedure and is willing and able to comply with the required follow-up visits and procedures
- Subject has a chronic, symptomatic lower limb ischemia defined as Rutherford categories 2 to 4
- Angiographic criteria:
- Single lesion or consecutive single lesions with a healthy segment(s) of ≤ 2cm in-between
- De novo, restenotic or (re)occluded lesion(s) post Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in the native superficial femoral artery (SFA) and or the proximal popliteal artery (PPA)
- Lesion(s) must be located at least 1 cm distal to the profunda femoris artery and at least 3 cm above the knee joint (radiographic joint space)
- Degree of stenosis ≥70% by visual angiographic assessment
- Vessel diameter ≥ 4 and ≤ 7 mm
- Patent inflow artery, free from significant lesion (\>50%) as confirmed by angiography. Treatment of the target lesion is acceptable after successful treatment of inflow iliac and/or common femoral artery lesion. The inflow lesion cannot be treated with a DCB or a Drug Eluting Stent
- Patent infrapopliteal and popliteal artery, i.e., single vessel runoff or better with at least one of the three vessels patent (\<50% stenosis) to the ankle or foot with no planned intervention
You may not qualify if:
- Previously stented target lesion
- Target lesion/ previously treated with drug-coated balloon \<12 months prior to enrollment.
- Use of atherectomy, laser or other debulking devices in the target SFA/PPA vessel during the index procedure.
- Failure to cross the target lesion with the guide wire
- Presence of a complication following pre-dilation of target lesion, which in the opinion of the investigator would not allow the procedure to be performed in accordance with the REACT approach
- Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel.
- Prior on planned major amputation (above the ankle) in the target limb
- Acute ischemia and/or acute thrombosis of the target SFA/PPA vessel prior to enrollment.
- Perforation of the target vessel as evidenced by extravasation of contrast media prior to enrollment
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to contrast media that, in the opinion of the investigator, cannot be adequately pre-medicated
- Known hypersensitivity/allergy to Paclitaxel or other components of the investigational devices and comparator (e.g., nitinol, amorphous silicon carbide, polymer)
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to antiplatelet, anticoagulant, thrombolytic medications that would be administered during the study
- Subject with uncorrected bleeding disorders
- Subject with renal failure
- Life expectancy less than 12 months due to other comorbidities, that in the investigators opinion, could limit subject ability to comply with the study required follow-up visits/procedure and threaten the study scientific integrity
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Biotronik AGlead
Study Sites (15)
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia
Medical University Graz
Graz, Austria
Medizinische Universität Wien
Vienna, Austria
OLV Ziekenhuis
Aalst, Belgium
A.Z. Sint-Blasius
Dendermonde, Belgium
AZ Groeninge
Kortrijk, Belgium
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, France
Hopital Paris Saint Joseph
Paris, France
Karolinen-Hospital, Klinikum Arnsberg
Arnsberg, Germany
Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg • Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, 79189, Germany
SRH Klinikum Karlsbad-Langensteinbach
Biederbach Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
Leipzig, Germany
Universitätsklinikum
Tübingen, Germany
GRN Hospital
Weinheim, Germany
Hospital General de Guadalajara
Guadalajara, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Koen Deloose, MD
Sint Blasius Hospital Dendermonde, Belgium
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrice Bibombe Mwipatayi, MD
Royal Perth Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Lichtenberg, MD
Clinic Arnsberg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2018
First Posted
June 6, 2018
Study Start
November 9, 2018
Primary Completion
January 3, 2022
Study Completion
March 1, 2024
Last Updated
August 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share