Impact of Preoperative Bathing on Post Caesarean Section Surgical Site Infection
SSI-MUST
The Impact of Preoperative Bathing With Chloroxylenol on the Incidence of Post Caesarean Section Surgical Site Infection at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Surgical site infection (SSI) is the commonest hospital-acquired infection globally, and prevalence is much higher in the low-income countries. Caesarean delivery carries a 5-20 fold risk for developing postpartum sepsis. SSIs cause significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalization and mortality. Simple and inexpensive interventions like preoperative bathing need to be studied, to assess their impact on surgical site infection rates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 7, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2018
CompletedJune 4, 2018
May 1, 2018
3 months
May 20, 2018
May 31, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgical site infection
Clinical diagnosis was made based on the CDC- 2013 definition of SSI
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Bathing
EXPERIMENTALIntervention was Preoperative bathing with antiseptic. Given warm water and a tablet soap containing chloroxylenol antiseptic. Asked to bathe under supervision for standardization. Given a clean theatre gown to put on. Taken through the routine pre-operative preparation procedures which involved; Putting an intravenous cannula; administering prophylactic antibiotics. Administering intravenous normal saline 1 liter. taking off a blood sample (3mls) for blood grouping and cross matching. Putting urethral catheter for drainage of urine, Getting an informed consent from the client for the procedure to be done. Informing the theatre team.
No bathing
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention done for participants in this arm. They go through the routine ward procedure as below. Putting an intravenous cannula; administering prophylactic antibiotics. Administering intravenous normal saline 1 liter. taking off a blood sample (3mls) for blood grouping and cross matching. Putting urethral catheter for drainage of urine, Getting an informed consent from the client for the procedure to be done. Informing the theatre team.
Interventions
Preoperative bathing with antiseptic was done as follows; Given warm water and a tablet soap containing chloroxylenol antiseptic. Asked to bathe under supervision for standardization. Given a clean theatre gown to put on. Taken through the routine pre-operative preparation procedures which involved; Putting an intravenous cannula; administering prophylactic antibiotics. Administering intravenous normal saline 1 liter. taking off a blood sample (3mls) for blood grouping and cross matching. Putting urethral catheter for drainage of urine, Getting an informed consent from the client for the procedure to be done. Informing the theatre team.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All mother scheduled for delivery by emergency C/S at MRRH during the study period.
You may not qualify if:
- Women who declined to consent.
- Women with obvious evidence of infection, like fever, foul-smelling liquor, or those already on antibiotics for reasons other than preoperative prophylaxis.
- Women in whom delivery was indicated to occur within less than 30 minutes, like in fetal distress, obstructed labor, pulsatile cord prolapse, or ruptured uterus.
- Women who could not communicate and give information for the study and those who do not have a working telephone contact.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mbarara University of Science and Technology
Mbarara, Uganda
Related Publications (2)
Lukabwe H, Kajabwangu R, Mugisha D, Mayengo H, Munyanderu B, Baluku A, Manyang A, Lapat JJ, Banya F, Kayondo M, Mayanja R, Muhumuza J, Bajunirwe F, Ngonzi J. Effectiveness of preoperative bath using chloroxylenol antiseptic soap on the incidence of post emergency cesarean section surgical site infection at Mbarara Regional Referral hospital, Uganda: a randomized controlled trial. Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Feb 2;41:92. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.92.23687. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35465375DERIVEDHadiati DR, Hakimi M, Nurdiati DS, Masuzawa Y, da Silva Lopes K, Ota E. Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6(6):CD007462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007462.pub5.
PMID: 32580252DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Henry Lukabwe, MD
Mbarara University of Science and Technology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Mothers scheduled to deliver by emergency Caesarean section were randomly assigned to either bathing or routine care arms in a ratio of 1:1. We did simple randomization to either bathing or routine care arm without any blocks. We generated patient group assignments using the computer algorithm (computer-generated list of random numbers). The research assistant who enrolled mothers into the study assigned the study arm by checking from the list of random numbers. The research assistant and the PI, who were on the outcomes assessment arm was not allowed to ask the study participant concerning the allocation arm. Single blinding of PI and one of the research assistants assessing outcomes was done to minimize bias.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2018
First Posted
June 4, 2018
Study Start
December 7, 2017
Primary Completion
February 21, 2018
Study Completion
March 21, 2018
Last Updated
June 4, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05