Peri-implantitis Treatment: Clinical Results of Conventional Treatment vs. the Addition of Biolase
Treatment of Peri-implantitis: Clinical Comparison Between Conventional Treatment Versus Conventional Plus Biolase Laser Treatment as a Co-adjuvant
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to observe the effects of two commonly utilized treatment modalities to treat peri-implantitis and to compare the results. The first method of treatment is debridement with curettes and ultrasonic scalers and it represents the traditional approach in the treatment of peri-implantitis. The second method of treatment involves the use of the Biolase laser in addition to the traditional approach of debriding with curettes and ultrasonic scalers. No studies exist comparing these two approaches, and this will serve as a pilot study to explore possible differences. The research hypothesis is that the addition of Er;Cr;YSGG laser is likely to be more effective in removing the microbiota from a rough implant surface, and that this will manifest with improved clinical parameters in subjects that receive this method of treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 14, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 9, 2024
CompletedAugust 9, 2024
July 1, 2024
2.6 years
April 30, 2018
June 17, 2022
July 16, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Probing Depth (PD)
Measured in mm with a manual periodontal probe (UNC-15). Recorded at 6 sites per implant (mesio-buccal and lingual, mid-buccal and lingual, disto-buccal and lingual). The average of all sites for all implants (26 implants in the Inactive Arm; 38 implants in the Active Arm) is reported.
Baseline, 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in Radiographic Bone Loss Around the Implant
Baseline, 9 months
Mean Change in Percent of Implants That Presented Bleeding on Probing (BoP)
Baseline, 9 months
Presence of Suppuration on Probing
9 months
Plaque Index (PI): Mean Change in Percent of Implants That Contained Plaque
Baseline, 9 months
Mobility: Mean Change in the Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
Baseline, 9 months
Study Arms (2)
Scaling and use of inactive Er,Cr:YSGG
SHAM COMPARATORScaling and debridement with hand scalers and ultrasonic unit together with the application of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser in an inactive fashion
Scaling and use of active Er,Cr:YSGG
EXPERIMENTALScaling and debridement with hand scalers and ultrasonic unit together with the application of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser in an active fashion
Interventions
Application of Er,Cr:YSGG in peri-implantitis cases as a coadjutant has shown reduction in the pocket depths and bleeding on probing
Scaling and debridement of the implant surface with hand scalers and curettes and an ultrasonic scaling unit (Cavitron -Dentsply Sirona)
Er,Cr:YSGG laser (inactive form - sham procedure) applied to the surface of the implant
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of at least one implant presenting with early to moderate peri-implantitis
- Peri-implantitis defined as an implant restoration with inflamed bleeding gingiva, probing depths around the implant of 5-8mm, bone loss and exposure of threads around the implant (limited to one-third of the threads exposed).
- Medically healthy non-smokers with no previous periodontal treatment other than routine maintenance
- Patients with diabetes were only included if they reported an HbA1C of 7% or less within the past 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- Mobility of the implant
- Peri-implantitis treatment rendered in the last 3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Columbia Universitylead
- Biolase Inccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Columbia University College of Dental Medicine
New York, New York, 10032, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Philip Y. Kang, DDS
- Organization
- Columbia University College of Dental Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philip Kang, DDS
Columbia University College of Dental Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Dental Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2018
First Posted
June 1, 2018
Study Start
January 14, 2019
Primary Completion
August 2, 2021
Study Completion
August 15, 2021
Last Updated
August 9, 2024
Results First Posted
August 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07