Introducing Palliative Care (PC) Within the Treatment of End Stage Liver Disease (ESLD)
PAL-LIVER
1 other identifier
interventional
1,494
1 country
19
Brief Summary
This is a comparative effectiveness study of two pragmatic models aiming to introduce palliative care for end stage liver disease patients. The 2 comparators are: Model 1: Consultative Palliative Care (i.e. direct access to Palliative Care provider), Model 2: Trained Hepatologist- led PC intervention (i.e. a hepatologist will receive formal training to deliver Palliative Care services) Primary Outcome: The change in quality of life from baseline to 3 months post enrollment as assessed by FACT-Hep (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Hepatobiliary). Primary Hypothesis: Compared to consultative PC, the trained hepatologist-led PC for ESLD patients will show superior primary outcome. In the event of nonsignificant superiority, the trained hepatologist-led PC led will show non-inferiority (NI) by ruling out a 4-point reduction (NI margin) in mean of the primary outcome as compared to the consultative PC. Power: The study has 83.2% power to detect minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 9 points in mean of the primary outcome between the two randomized arms. We have 79.2% power for the noninferiority hypothesis, under assumption that the trained hepatologist-led PC arm performs better than the consultative PC arm by half of the above MCID. Setting: 19 Clinical Centers across US are recruited to participate in this study. Qualitative nested study will interview patients, caregivers and providers to assess their experiences with participating in the palliative care trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 17, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 27, 2025
CompletedDecember 2, 2025
November 1, 2025
6.4 years
May 17, 2018
July 29, 2025
November 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of Life (QOL)
FACT-Hep (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Hepatobiliary) will be used to assess QOL. This is a 45 item self-reported instrument. FACT-Hep total score is the primary outcome. The scores range from 0 to 180. Higher scores reflect better QOL. This measure is for patients only.
Mean change in FACT-Hep total score from baseline to 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Patient's Symptom Burden
Change in ESAS total score from baseline to 3 months
Patient's Depression Severity
Change in PHQ-9 scores from baseline to 3 months
Patient Satisfaction
Change in FAMCARE-P scores from baseline to 3 months.
Distress
Change in Distress from baseline to 3 months
Goal Concordant Care Questionnaire/ GCC (Patients)
Change in GCC scales from baseline to 3 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Model 1: Consultative Palliative Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORDirect access to Palliative Care provider, who will offer palliative care to patients and caregivers, as guided by a standard PC (palliative care) checklist.
Model 2: Trained Hepatologist- led PC
ACTIVE COMPARATORA hepatologist will receive formal training to deliver Palliative Care (PC) services, and will offer palliative care to patients and caregivers following the same PC checklist as in Model 1
Interventions
The intervention will comprise an approach to render palliative care, as taught to hepatologists through an on-line learning platform, and as delivered by PC providers as routine care. The elements of the intervention, which will be guided by a checklist and implemented over the course of interactions with the patient and caregivers at the initial, 1, 2, and 3 month visits, to include: 1. Patient/caregiver understanding of diagnosis, illness and prognosis 2. Symptom assessment and management 3. Psychosocial assessment and management 4. Distress screening and management 5. Discussion of goals of care 6. Advanced directives
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years) with:
- cirrhosis and a decompensation event indicative of ESLD (such as ascites, variceal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy) within the prior 6 months, or
- hepatocellular cancer (HCC) except Barcelona Stage D, or multifocal HCC (as defined by standard guidelines and confirmed by treating hepatologist).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (19)
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
Banner Health- University Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States
UCSF Fresno
Fresno, California, 93701, United States
Loma Linda Unversity Health
Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States
VA West Haven
West Haven, Connecticut, 06516, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
Miami VA Medical Center
Miami, Florida, 33125, United States
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
VA Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, 02130, United States
University of Michigan Medical Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Kansas City VA Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64128, United States
VA New York Harbor
Brooklyn, New York, 11209, United States
VA Bronx
The Bronx, New York, 10468, United States
UNC Liver Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Durham V.A. Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Albert Einstein Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (5)
Verma M, Tapper EB, Singal AG, Navarro V. Nonhospice Palliative Care Within the Treatment of End-Stage Liver Disease. Hepatology. 2020 Jun;71(6):2149-2159. doi: 10.1002/hep.31226.
PMID: 32167615BACKGROUNDDeNofrio JC, Verma M, Kosinski AS, Navarro V, Taddei TH, Volk ML, Bakitas M, Ramchandran K. Palliative Care Always: Hepatology-Virtual Primary Palliative Care Training for Hepatologists. Hepatol Commun. 2022 Apr;6(4):920-930. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1849. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
PMID: 34719137BACKGROUNDVerma M, Bakitas MA. Creating Effective Models for Delivering Palliative Care in Advanced Liver Disease. Curr Hepatol Rep. 2021;20(2):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s11901-021-00562-0. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
PMID: 33868897BACKGROUNDHoppmann N, Bakitas M, Stockdill M, DeNofrio J, Navarro V, Verma M. Palliative Care for Advanced Liver Disease: Hepatology and Palliative Care Specialists Experiences. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2026 Jan;71(1):157-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.028. Epub 2025 Oct 8.
PMID: 41072740DERIVEDVerma M, Kosinski AS, Volk ML, Taddei T, Ramchandran K, Bakitas M, Green K, Green L, Navarro V. Introducing Palliative Care within the Treatment of End-Stage Liver Disease: The Study Protocol of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):34-43. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0121.
PMID: 31486722DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Manisha Verma, MD, MPH. Director, Research
- Organization
- Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manisha Verma, MD, MPH
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Victor Navarro, MD
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The study investigators were masked to comparative outcomes measures until the study was completed and database was locked.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Research, Department of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 17, 2018
First Posted
May 30, 2018
Study Start
January 30, 2019
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
August 30, 2025
Last Updated
December 2, 2025
Results First Posted
October 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share