NCT03538652

Brief Summary

Background: Many smartphone apps intend to help people with addictions. But not enough is known about how they should work. Researchers want to study an app that gives people the advice they need, just when they need it. This is a Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention (JITAI). To create a good JITAI, researchers need to know what approaches work best at different moments. Objective: To develop ways to treat addiction with a smartphone app. Eligibility: Adults ages 18-75 who use heroin or other opioids Design: Participants will be screened in another protocol. Participants will visit a Baltimore clinic 3 days a week to give urine and breath samples. Some participants will get their treatment at this clinic. Participants will answer questions about their personality and stress. Participants will randomly be assigned to the JITAI group or a comparison group. Participants will have a training session on using the smartphone app. JITAI participants will also watch a video about the written messages they will see in the app. Weeks 3-10: Participants will carry a smartphone. Four times a day, it will beep and ask questions. These will be about the participants' activities and mood. The JITAI group will see a short message after. The message is meant to be helpful. For the first 16 evenings, JITAI participants will get more information on the phone. Answers to the app's questions will be transferred automatically from the smartphone to secure computers at the NIH. During the last week, participants can choose the kind of messages they see. Week 11: participants will return the smartphone and answer questions. Weeks 12-16, participants who are getting their medicine from the research clinic will be encouraged to transfer to other clinics. Otherwise, they will have their dose slowly reduced to zero.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
9

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 25, 2018

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 29, 2018

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 19, 2020

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 13, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 13, 2020

Completed
5.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 9, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 9, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

23 days

First QC Date

May 25, 2018

Results QC Date

August 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 21, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)MindfulnessOpiatesEcological Monetary Assessment (EMA)Microrandomized Trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Change in Opioid Craving Rating

    Change in opioid craving within 20 minutes from receiving app messages. Participants designates four one-hour time bands within their typical waking hours, covering morning through late evening. During each of those time bands, the app will push a pair of assessments, given 20 minutes apart. Pre and post assessment ratings will be done using rating scale on the app from 0 to 100 ("0 = not at all" to "100- as much as possible"). Higher number indicates more opioid craving. Participants will complete ratings four times daily for 11 weeks. Analysis will be done in multilevel models.

    Within 20 minutes from receiving app message

  • Change in Mood Rating

    Change in mood within 20 minutes from receiving app message. Rating will be done using rating scale on the app from 0 to 100 ("0 = not at all" to "100 = as much as possible"). Higher number indicates more negative mood. Participants will complete ratings four times daily for 11 weeks. Analysis will be done in multilevel models.

    Within 20 minutes from receiving app message

  • Change in Self-efficacy

    Change in self-efficacy within 20 minutes from receiving app message. Rating will be done using rating scale on the app from 0 to 100 ("0 = not at all" to "100 = as much as possible"). Higher number indicates more positive self-efficacy. Participants will complete ratings four times daily for 11 weeks. Analysis will be done in multilevel models.

    Within 20 minutes from receiving app message

  • Strategy-situation Fit of Cognitive-behavioral Therapy (CBT)

    The analysis will be a test of whether cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) messages are most effective in controllable situations and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) messages are most effective in noncontrollable situations. A situation will be categorized as noncontrollable when a participant gives a response of less than 50/100 on either of these two "pre" items: (1) "I could easily be somewhere else right now if I wanted," (2) "I could easily get out of what I'm doing right now." Otherwise, will categorize the situation as controllable. Analysis will be done in multilevel models.

    Within 20 minutes from receiving app message

  • Strategy-situation Fit of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

    The analysis will be a test of whether cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) messages are most effective in controllable situations and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) messages are most effective in noncontrollable situations. A situation will be categorized as noncontrollable when a participant gives a response of less than 50/100 on either of these two "pre" items: (1) "I could easily be somewhere else right now if I wanted," (2) "I could easily get out of what I'm doing right now." Otherwise, will categorize the situation as controllable. Analysis will be done in multilevel models.

    Within 20 minutes from receiving app message

  • Change in Coping Self-efficacy

    Participants coping self-efficacy will be assessed using the Drug-Taking Confidence Questionnaire (DTCQ-8), an 8-item measure of coping self-efficacy in the context of resisting lapses to drug misuse and administered by clinician. Each item is scored from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates more confidence. Assessment will be administered at weeks 2 and 11. Data will be analyzed via analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with score from week 2 as the covariate to assess change (change = week 11 minus week 2).

    week 2 versus week 11

  • Change in Coping-style Flexibility

    Coping-style flexibility was assessed using the Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE) questionnaire, a 60-item self-report scale assessing both general coping styles and coping behaviors in specific situations. Each item is rated 1 = I usually don't do this at all, to 4 = I usually do this a lot, with total score of 60 to 240. Higher score indicates improved coping. Assessment will be administered at weeks 2 and 11. Data will be analyzed via analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with score from week 2 as the covariate to assess change (change = week 11 minus week 2).

    week 2 versus week 11

  • Change in Flexibility Index Test (FIT)

    The Flexibility Index Test (FIT-60), a standard measure of traits associated with mindfulness, such as "I observe my feelings without losing myself in them" and "It is OK if I remember something unpleasant," and (reverse scored) "I believe that some of my thoughts are abnormal or bad and that I shouldn't think like that." Each item is rated 0 (completely disagree) to 6 (completely agree) for total score of 0 to 360. Higher score indicates better psychological flexibility. Assessment will be administered at weeks 2 and 11. Data will be analyzed via analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with score from week 2 as the covariate to assess change (change = week 11 minus week 2).

    week 2 versus week 11

Study Arms (3)

Phase 1, Arm 1: Formative Interviews

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Outpatient adults who are in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) participate in a formative-interview phase (one hour) to drive intervention formation for the trial participants groups.

Other: Formative Interviews (not an intervention)

Phase 2, Arm 1: Just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) group

EXPERIMENTAL

Outpatient adults who are in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) will receive electronic messages on their smartphone via an app and education on some basic principles of CBT and ACT. Participants will designate four one-hour time bands within their typical waking hours, covering morning through late evening. During each of those time bands, the app will push a pair of assessments, given 20 minutes apart.

Behavioral: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)Behavioral: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)

Phase 2, Arm 2: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) group (control group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Outpatient adults who are in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) will receive electronic messages on their smartphone via an app. Participants will designate four one-hour time bands within their typical waking hours, covering morning through late evening. During each of those time bands, the app will push a pair of assessments, given 20 minutes apart.

Other: No intervention

Interventions

One hour formative-interview session

Phase 1, Arm 1: Formative Interviews

In CBT, negative emotional states are viewed as problems to be solved, and the client learns skills to solve them.

Phase 2, Arm 1: Just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) group

In ACT, negative emotional states are viewed as a necessary and potentially valuable component of a full life. When they occur, the goal is not to solve them, but to experience them in an observant, curious, nonjudgmental way-a practice referred to as mindfulness.

Phase 2, Arm 1: Just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) group

Control group with no intervention administered

Phase 2, Arm 2: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) group (control group)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Phase 1: Formative interviews.
  • The enrollment ceiling is 35 outpatients (to collect evaluable data from 30) who meet these criteria: (1) Age 18-75; (2) physical dependence on opioids (by self-report); (3) interest in receiving the types of treatment about which we will be conducting interviews.
  • Phase 2: Clinical trial with microrandomization.
  • The enrollment ceiling is 150 outpatients (to collect evaluable data from 85, of whom 50 will be randomized to JITAI, and 35 to EMA control). Treatment may be provided by us in the form of office-based buprenorphine treatment (OBOT) or may be provided elsewhere (Treatment Elsewhere, TE).
  • Participants must meet these criteria:
  • OBOT participants: (1) Age 18-75; (2) physical dependence on opioids (by positive urine and/or frank opioid withdrawal); (3) interest in receiving the types of treatment we are testing.
  • Treatment Elsewhere (TE) participants: (1) Age 18-75; (2) receiving methadone or buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence from a qualified provider in the community; (3) interest in receiving the types of treatment we are testing.

You may not qualify if:

  • Phase 1: Formative interviews. (1) cognitive impairment severe enough to preclude informed consent or valid interview responses.
  • Phase 2: Clinical trial with microrandomization.
  • OBOT participants:
  • (1) History of any DSM-V psychotic disorder; history of bipolar disorder; current Major Depressive Disorder;
  • (2) unresolved symptoms of PTSD that, in the investigators view, would make it risky for the participant to undertake mindfulness exercises (e.g., observing all one's current negative thoughts and emotions) in an unsupervised setting;
  • (3) current dependence on alcohol or sedative-hypnotic, e.g. benzodiazepine (by DSM-V criteria);
  • (4) cognitive impairment severe enough to preclude informed consent or valid self-report;
  • (5) Any condition that interferes with urine collection;
  • (6) medical illness (e.g., cirrhosis, nephritic syndrome, thyroid disease, ischemic heart disease, epilepsy, adrenal insufficiency, etc.) or medications that, in the view of the investigators, would compromise participation in research.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Baltimore, Maryland, 21224, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Behavior, Addictive

Interventions

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAcceptance and Commitment Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Compulsive BehaviorImpulsive BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Limitations and Caveats

Study was closed before any data were collected for the primary outcomes.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. David Epstein
Organization
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Study Officials

  • David H Epstein, Ph.D.

    National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NIH
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2018

First Posted

May 29, 2018

Study Start

February 19, 2020

Primary Completion

March 13, 2020

Study Completion

March 13, 2020

Last Updated

September 9, 2025

Results First Posted

September 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Some health information collected may be placed into one or more scientific databases after it has been stripped of identifiers such as name, address or account number, so that it may be used for future research on any topic and shared broadly for research purposes. A researcher who wants to study the information must apply to the database and be approved.

Access Criteria
We will share some protocol data with our scientific research partners inside or outside the NIH. Research partners outside the NIH sign an agreement with the NIH to share data. This agreement indicates the type of data that can be shared and what can be done with those data.

Locations