Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Postoperative Pain for Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is a newly described and effective interfascial plane block for thoracic and abdominal surgery. It was first described by Forero et al. in 2016, effectiveness being reported in four cases. The paravertebral block has been successfully used in various surgical patient groups for purposes of anesthesia or postoperative pain management such as thoracotomy, breast surgery and abdominal surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic effects of erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block in patients undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Dec 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2018
CompletedMay 10, 2019
May 1, 2019
9 months
May 16, 2018
May 9, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative opioid consumption
First 24 hours total fentanyl consumption with patient controlled analgesia
First 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Visual analog pain score
postoperative 0-24 hours
Block performing time
First hour
Study Arms (2)
ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block
ACTIVE COMPARATORultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine
ultrasound guided paravertebral block
ACTIVE COMPARATORultrasound guided paravertebral block with 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine
Interventions
Single shot 20 ml 0.25 bupivacaine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologist's physiologic state I-III patients
- Undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic surgery
You may not qualify if:
- chronic pain
- bleeding disorders
- renal or hepatic insufficiency
- patients on chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications
- emergency cases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ataturk University
Erzurum, 25100, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2018
First Posted
May 29, 2018
Study Start
December 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 30, 2018
Last Updated
May 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share