Restricted Fluid Therapy in Colorectal Surgery
Perioperative Fluid Treatment in Colorectal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
172
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This is a protocol for a trial carried out from 1999 to 2002. At that time, surgical patients received a large volume of intravenous saline during operations on the colon or the rectum, often so much fluid that their bodyweight increased by 4-6 kilograms. We hypothesized; that a restricted fluid regimen could prevent the development of cardiopulmonary complications and improve wound healing including the healing of an anastomosis of the gut. We designed a clinical randomized assessor blinded multi-center trial comparing a restricted fluid regimen to a standard fluid regimen, the difference being the volume of saline administered to the patients. Patients undergoing surgery on the colon or the rectum were included after informed oral and written consent. The restricted regimen aimed at zero-fluid balance with allowance for a body weight increase of 1 kg. The standard regimen was a bit "dryer" than the actual standard; our patients in the standard group received saline causing a body weight increase of only 3-4 kg. The fluid therapy started at midnight the day of operation, went on through the operation and continued on the wards until discharge. The patients were encouraged to eat and drink as much and as soon as possible after the operation. The primary outcome was the number of patients who died or suffered a complication measured within 30 days of surgery. We looked at all complications, but especially heart and lung complications and complications related to the healing of wounds and anastomosis. The patients was examined in the outpatient clinic after 30 days, and in addition, blinded assessors were reviewing the medical files for registration of postoperative complications. The results are published in The Annals of Surgery 2003; 238(5)641-48. The restricted regimen nearly halved the number of patients with complications, and heart and lung complications were almost eliminated. Other investigators confirmed the results, and a more restricted approach to fluid therapy to surgical patients has been implemented worldwide.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Nov 1999
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 1999
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2001
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2018
CompletedOctober 5, 2018
October 1, 2018
1.8 years
May 11, 2018
October 3, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative complications and mortality
The complications was defined by protocol.
After 30 days of follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Cardiopulmonary complications
After 30 days of follow-up
Complications related to tissue healing
After 30 days of follow-up
Other Outcomes (1)
Hospital stay
after 30 days of follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Restricted group
EXPERIMENTALOral fluid to 2 h before surgery. Intra-operatively: Glucose 5% (500 ml - volume drunk during fast); HAES 6% for blood loss volume to volume; IV-medicine in saline 0.9% for anesthesia and antibiotics. Blood products after current rules. Postoperatively: 1000 ml glucose containing fluid in the recovery room. Free oral intake of fluid and food as well as enteral feeding by tube 500 ml. In the wards: Enteral feeding by tube 1000 ml postoperative day 1-3. Free fluid and food by mouth. If less than 1500 ml fluid pr. mouth supplement with VI-fluid. Pathological fluid loss (high output stoma, aspirate, vomit etc.) - replace with IV-fluid. Goal: zero fluid balance with up to 1-kilogram body weight increase. Urine \< 0.5 ml/kg/h: supplement with fluid. MAP \< 60 and hypovolemia: treat with fluid.
Standard group
ACTIVE COMPARATOROral fluid to 2 h before surgery. Intra-operatively: Saline 500 ml for fasting; 500 ml HAES 6% for the epidural, Saline for the third space: 7 ml/kg/h first hour, 5 ml/kg/h 2.-3. Hour, 3 ml/kg/h subsequent hours. 1000-1500 ml Saline replaced lost blood up to 500 ml, additional HAES 6% for additional blood loss; IV-medicine in saline. Postoperatively: 1000-2000 ml isotonic fluid in the recovery room. Free oral fluid and food as well as enteral feeding by tube 500 ml. In the wards: Enteral feeding by tube 1000 ml postoperative day 1-3. Free fluid and food by mouth. Supplemental iv-fluid according to department rules. Pathological fluid loss (high output stoma, aspirate, vomit etc.) - replace with IV-fluid. Urine \< 0.5 ml/kg/h: supplement with fluid. MAP \< 60 and hypovolemia: treat with fluid.
Interventions
To reduce the volume of saline administered during surgery of the colon and the rectum
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for planned surgery on the colon or the rectum
- ASA group 1-3
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to give informed consent (mental disorders, dementia, language problems)
- Patients with:
- Diabetes mellitus
- Renal insufficiency
- Disseminated cancers or secondary cancers
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Diseases hindering epidural analgesia
- Alcohol consumption more than 35 drinks pr. Week
- Pregnant and lactating woman.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Holbaek Sygehuslead
- Bispebjerg Hospitalcollaborator
- University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagencollaborator
- Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagencollaborator
- Herlev Hospitalcollaborator
- Hillerod Hospital, Denmarkcollaborator
- Vejle Hospitalcollaborator
- Aalborg University Hospitalcollaborator
- Zealand University Hospitalcollaborator
Related Publications (10)
Lowell JA, Schifferdecker C, Driscoll DF, Benotti PN, Bistrian BR. Postoperative fluid overload: not a benign problem. Crit Care Med. 1990 Jul;18(7):728-33. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199007000-00010.
PMID: 2364713BACKGROUNDBeier-Holgersen R, Boesby S. Influence of postoperative enteral nutrition on postsurgical infections. Gut. 1996 Dec;39(6):833-5. doi: 10.1136/gut.39.6.833.
PMID: 9038665BACKGROUNDNielsen OM, Engell HC. Increased glomerular filtration rate in patients after reconstructive surgery on the abdominal aorta. Br J Surg. 1986 Jan;73(1):34-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730113.
PMID: 3947870BACKGROUNDRasmussen LA, Rosenberg J, Crawford ME, Kehlet H. [Perioperative fluid therapy. A quality control study]. Ugeskr Laeger. 1996 Sep 16;158(38):5286-90. Danish.
PMID: 8966776BACKGROUNDVamvakas EC, Carven JH, Hibberd PL. Blood transfusion and infection after colorectal cancer surgery. Transfusion. 1996 Nov-Dec;36(11-12):1000-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36111297091746.x.
PMID: 8937412BACKGROUNDCosnett JE. The origins of intravenous fluid therapy. Lancet. 1989 Apr 8;1(8641):768-71. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92583-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 2564573BACKGROUNDVermeulen LC Jr, Ratko TA, Erstad BL, Brecher ME, Matuszewski KA. A paradigm for consensus. The University Hospital Consortium guidelines for the use of albumin, nonprotein colloid, and crystalloid solutions. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Feb 27;155(4):373-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.155.4.373.
PMID: 7848020BACKGROUNDWeinstein PD, Doerfler ME. Systemic complications of fluid resuscitation. Crit Care Clin. 1992 Apr;8(2):439-48.
PMID: 1568149BACKGROUNDBrandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortso E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen PE, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F; Danish Study Group on Perioperative Fluid Therapy. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003 Nov;238(5):641-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23.
PMID: 14578723RESULTBrandstrup B, Beier-Holgersen R, Iversen LH, Starup CB, Wentzel LN, Lindorff-Larsen K, Petersen TC, Tonnesen H. The Influence of Perioperative Fluid Therapy on N-terminal-pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide and the Association With Heart and Lung Complications in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: Secondary Results of a Clinical Randomized Assessor-blinded Multicenter Trial. Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):941-949. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003724.
PMID: 31850996DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Birgitte Brandstrup, PhD
Holbaek Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Surgeon, Clinical Associate Professor, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2018
First Posted
May 25, 2018
Study Start
November 1, 1999
Primary Completion
August 31, 2001
Study Completion
August 31, 2001
Last Updated
October 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10